H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Pam Shriver vs Ann Henricksson H2H: 6-1

Pam Shriver holds a 6–1 lead over Ann Henricksson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Pam Shriver leads 3–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1993 Tokyo Japan Open round of 16 6-1 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
6 – 1
7 main-draw meetings
Ann Henricksson
USA Age 66

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pam Shriver #30 6-1 (ret.) Ann Henricksson #221 Match data Apr 9, 1993* R16 Tokyo Japan Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Pam Shriver #20 6-2 6-2 Ann Henricksson #55 Match data Feb 15, 1990* R32 Chicago Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet
Pam Shriver #10 6-3 6-2 Ann Henricksson #59 Match data Jul 20, 1989* R32 Newport WTA 250 Grass
Ann Henricksson #61 7-6 7-5 Pam Shriver #8 Match data Jun 16, 1989* R16 Birmingham WTA 250 Grass
Pam Shriver #5 6-1 6-2 Ann Henricksson #50 Match data Oct 18, 1986* QF Porsche Tennis Grand Prix WTA 250 Carpet
Pam Shriver #6 6-3 6-7 6-4 Ann Henricksson Match data May 18, 1985* QF Melbourne WTA 250 Carpet
Pam Shriver 6-1 6-3 Ann Henricksson Match data Oct 13, 1983* R32 Tampa WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,304 626 278 69.2% 0 0 0 5 19 24
Ann Henricksson #892 #36 21 1,755 147 210 41.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Shriver Ann Henricksson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,838 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,813 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1980 47–21 69.1% #9 2,054 0 2 — — — — — — —
18 1981 58–25 69.9% #7 2,137 0 4 — — — — — — —
19 1982 47–19 71.2% #6 2,098 0 5 — — — — — — —
20 1983 52–15 77.6% #4 2,162 0 8 1980 3–5 37.5% — 1,498 0 0
21 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10 1981 1–4 20.0% — 1,478 0 0
22 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,118 0 14 1982 5–6 45.5% — 1,522 0 0
23 1986 47–15 75.8% #6 2,196 0 16 1983 9–19 32.1% — 1,540 0 0
24 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,255 0 20 1984 13–16 44.8% #40 1,658 0 0
25 1988 60–15 80.0% #5 2,197 0 24 1985 18–22 45.0% #36 1,697 0 0
26 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,960 0 24 1986 20–21 48.8% #49 1,691 0 0
27 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,915 0 24 1987 17–23 42.5% #60 1,652 0 0
28 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,823 0 24 1988 15–19 44.1% #71 1,647 0 0
29 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,857 0 24 1989 18–21 46.2% #53 1,676 0 0
30 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24 1990 11–19 36.7% #114 1,628 0 0
31 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24 1991 8–13 38.1% #142 1,596 0 0
32 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24 1992 0–6 0.0% #272 1,525 0 0
33 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24 1993 5–9 35.7% #141 1,542 0 0
34 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24 1994 4–7 36.4% #215 1,530 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pam Shriver Ann Henricksson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1978 6 1 7 85.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1980 22 7 29 75.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 9 7 16 56.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1981 15 5 20 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 19 3 22 86.4% 18 15 33 54.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1982 11 4 15 73.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 18 9 27 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1983 17 3 20 85.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 13 3 16 81.3% 20 8 28 71.4% 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1984 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 15 4 19 78.9% 19 6 25 76.0% 1981 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1985 14 3 17 82.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 19 4 23 82.6% 19 4 23 82.6% 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1986 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 10 1 11 90.9% 23 9 32 71.9% 1983 3 7 10 30.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1987 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — 30 5 35 85.7% 17 5 22 77.3% 1984 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1988 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 24 4 28 85.7% 16 3 19 84.2% 1985 4 8 12 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 7 10 30.0%
26 1989 12 7 19 63.2% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1986 6 5 11 54.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 9 10 19 47.4%
27 1990 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 1987 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 7 10 30.0%
28 1991 11 11 22 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1988 3 11 14 21.4% — — — — 8 5 13 61.5% 4 3 7 57.1%
29 1992 11 9 20 55.0% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 1989 11 13 24 45.8% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
30 1993 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1990 5 10 15 33.3% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7%
31 1994 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 1991 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
32 1995 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 1992 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 1996 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
34 1997 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
Career — 196 100 296 66.2% 18 12 30 60.0% 205 61 266 77.1% 204 104 308 66.2% — 54 94 148 36.5% 9 20 29 31.0% 57 49 106 53.8% 27 47 74 36.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pam Shriver Ann Henricksson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1978 1839 153.8 — — — — +104 — -258 69.2% +1.66 4–3 (57%) 7–3 (70%) 108.7 +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1979 1813 147.5 — — — — +7 — -37 57.1% +0.36 0–8 (0%) 4–2 (67%) 93.1 -0.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1980 2055 163.4 — — — — -49 -406 -67 68.7% +1.41 11–9 (55%) 8–7 (53%) 104.9 -7.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1981 2138 166.4 — — — — -89 -332 -9 71.3% +1.67 4–10 (29%) 10–6 (63%) 96.8 -6.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1982 2099 161.9 — — — — -1 -284 +23 69.7% +1.63 7–7 (50%) 7–5 (58%) 102.0 -2.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1983 2163 167.8 — — — — +33 -321 +16 73.1% +1.83 11–6 (65%) 7–5 (58%) 101.0 -4.79 1980 1499 103.6 — — — — — +3 +85 41.2% -1.35 0–1 — — +0.35
21 1984 2061 163.5 — — — — +77 — +84 75.8% +1.98 4–8 (33%) 7–2 (78%) 94.6 -0.74 1981 1479 107.0 — — — — — +41 — 27.3% -1.46 0–1 1–1 — +0.34
22 1985 2119 161.1 — — — — +48 -302 +85 75.7% +1.82 10–4 (71%) 13–7 (65%) 101.9 +0.23 1982 1523 114.8 — — — — +33 0 — 38.1% -0.95 1–0 — — -0.02
23 1986 2196 175.2 — — — — +23 — +26 75.9% +2.04 2–7 (22%) 7–4 (64%) 95.5 -4.63 1983 1541 115.5 — — — — 0 -4 +70 33.8% -0.85 5–4 (56%) 1–3 (25%) 101.4 +1.02
24 1987 2256 167.4 — — — — -1 — +39 78.5% +2.08 8–4 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 -3.44 1984 1659 129.1 — — — — -145 -134 +106 46.9% -0.42 2–4 (33%) 5–1 (83%) 102.6 +0.30
25 1988 2197 167.5 — — — — +37 — +105 76.5% +1.85 11–5 (69%) 8–6 (57%) 98.7 -3.71 1985 1698 131.9 — — — — -127 — +89 47.9% -0.26 6–10 (38%) 8–6 (57%) 101.0 +1.52
26 1989 1961 141.0 — — — — +38 — +226 60.0% +0.72 8–6 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 92.2 +0.34 1986 1692 127.5 — — — — -41 -178 +86 48.3% -0.36 7–4 (64%) 7–4 (64%) 106.1 +1.06
27 1990 1915 136.1 — — — — +25 — — 58.6% +0.83 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.41 1987 1652 125.5 — — — — -15 -155 +68 41.5% -0.29 9–5 (64%) 2–9 (18%) 100.7 -0.53
28 1991 1823 146.6 — — — — -5 — +351 56.0% +0.62 1–5 (17%) 2–8 (20%) 88.5 -2.30 1988 1647 128.7 — — — — -58 — +101 45.5% -0.05 6–5 (55%) 2–5 (29%) 99.8 +0.89
29 1992 1857 156.5 — — — — +5 — +328 56.4% +0.71 5–3 (63%) 4–5 (44%) 101.5 -2.50 1989 1676 133.3 — — — — -49 — +86 45.6% -0.20 7–5 (58%) 3–7 (30%) 99.5 +0.99
30 1993 1820 148.3 — — — — +6 — +300 52.5% +0.05 4–7 (36%) 3–2 (60%) 95.2 -1.73 1990 1628 118.2 — — — — -73 — +176 37.1% -1.06 6–4 (60%) 4–6 (40%) 103.2 -1.10
31 1994 1700 125.8 — — — — +6 — +296 48.5% -0.04 5–7 (42%) 3–3 (50%) 95.7 +0.51 1991 1597 121.1 — — — — -38 — +179 39.6% -0.50 3–3 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 98.7 +0.17
32 1995 1649 116.2 — — — — -2 — +277 38.1% -0.64 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 +0.26 1992 1525 101.7 — — — — -19 — — 20.0% -2.33 0–3 (0%) — — -0.35
33 1996 1611 115.9 — — — — -22 — +337 39.3% -0.79 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.33 1993 1542 121.7 — — — — -1 — — 45.5% -0.18 2–5 (29%) 0–2 — -0.12
34 1997 1636 111.8 — — — — -20 — — 57.1% +0.86 1–0 0–2 — -0.20 1994 1531 101.5 — — — — -10 — — 30.4% -1.52 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +0.07
Career — 2304 166.5 — — — — +10 -331 +78 67.8% +1.37 103–105 (50%) 102–76 (57%) 97.2 -4.47 — 1756 130.0 — — — — -50 -58 +100 42.3% -0.52 56–55 (50%) 36–50 (42%) 101.3 +1.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.