H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Pam Shriver vs Ann Henricksson H2H: 6-1

Pam Shriver holds a 6–1 lead over Ann Henricksson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Pam Shriver leads 3–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1993 Tokyo Japan Open fourth round 6-1 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
6 – 1
7 main draw meetings
Ann Henricksson
USA Age 66

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 9, 1993* Tokyo Japan Open WTA 250 R16 Hard Pam Shriver #30 6-1 (ret.) Ann Henricksson #221 Match data
Feb 15, 1990* Chicago WTA 1000 R32 Carpet Pam Shriver #20 6-2 6-2 Ann Henricksson #55 Match data
Jul 20, 1989* Newport WTA 250 R32 Grass Pam Shriver #10 6-3 6-2 Ann Henricksson #59 Match data
Jun 16, 1989* Birmingham WTA 250 R16 Grass Ann Henricksson #61 7-6 7-5 Pam Shriver #8 Match data
Oct 18, 1986* Filderstadt WTA 250 QF Carpet Pam Shriver #5 6-1 6-2 Ann Henricksson #50 Match data
May 18, 1985* Melbourne WTA 250 QF Carpet Pam Shriver #6 6-3 6-7 6-4 Ann Henricksson #36 Match data
Oct 13, 1983* Tampa WTA 250 R32 Hard Pam Shriver 6-1 6-3 Ann Henricksson Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,302 624 277 69.3% 0 0 0 4 20 24
Ann Henricksson #892 #36 21 1,756 147 210 41.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Shriver Ann Henricksson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,849 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,798 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1980 47–21 69.1% — 2,027 0 2 — — — — — — —
18 1981 58–25 69.9% — 2,122 0 4 — — — — — — —
19 1982 47–19 71.2% — 2,087 0 5 — — — — — — —
20 1983 52–15 77.6% — 2,161 0 8 1980 3–5 37.5% — 1,498 0 0
21 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10 1981 1–4 20.0% — 1,480 0 0
22 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,117 0 14 1982 5–6 45.5% — 1,535 0 0
23 1986 47–15 75.8% #5 2,194 0 16 1983 9–19 32.1% — 1,546 0 0
24 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,254 0 20 1984 13–16 44.8% #40 1,660 0 0
25 1988 58–14 80.6% #5 2,188 0 24 1985 18–22 45.0% #36 1,699 0 0
26 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,955 0 24 1986 20–21 48.8% #49 1,706 0 0
27 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,911 0 24 1987 17–23 42.5% #60 1,655 0 0
28 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,822 0 24 1988 15–19 44.1% #71 1,649 0 0
29 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,858 0 24 1989 18–21 46.2% #53 1,677 0 0
30 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24 1990 11–19 36.7% #114 1,628 0 0
31 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24 1991 8–13 38.1% #142 1,598 0 0
32 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24 1992 0–6 0.0% #272 1,526 0 0
33 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24 1993 5–9 35.7% #141 1,543 0 0
34 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24 1994 4–7 36.4% #215 1,531 0 0