H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Pam Shriver vs Anne Smith H2H: 5-4

Pam Shriver holds a 5–4 lead over Anne Smith in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Pam Shriver leads 3–2 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1989 Chicago fourth round 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
5 – 4
9 main draw meetings
Anne Smith
Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 10, 1989* Chicago WTA 250 R16 Carpet Pam Shriver #13 6-4 6-2 Anne Smith Match data
Sep 22, 1989* Dallas WTA 250 R16 Carpet Anne Smith 3-6 7-6 6-4 Pam Shriver #9 Match data
Aug 31, 1988* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Pam Shriver #5 6-4 6-3 Anne Smith Match data
Jan 4, 1982 Washington WTA 250 QF Carpet Anne Smith 6-3 6-4 Pam Shriver Match data
Nov 21, 1981* Perth 2 WTA 250 QF Grass Pam Shriver 6-2 7-6 Anne Smith Match data
Sep 9, 1981* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Anne Smith 6-4 1-6 7-5 Pam Shriver Match data
Feb 6, 1981* Detroit WTA 250 R16 Carpet Pam Shriver 1-6 6-1 7-6 Anne Smith Match data
Mar 6, 1978 Dallas WTA 250 BR Carpet Pam Shriver (w/o) Anne Smith Match data
Feb 19, 1978* Salibury WTA 250 F — Anne Smith 4-6 6-3 6-4 Pam Shriver Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,302 624 277 69.3% 0 0 0 4 20 24
Anne Smith — — — 2,050 221 173 56.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Shriver Anne Smith
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,849 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,798 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1980 47–21 69.1% — 2,027 0 2 1977 8–3 72.7% — 1,634 0 1
18 1981 58–25 69.9% — 2,122 0 4 1978 14–7 66.7% — 1,784 0 2
19 1982 47–19 71.2% — 2,087 0 5 1979 28–28 50.0% — 1,847 0 2
20 1983 52–15 77.6% — 2,161 0 8 1980 21–21 50.0% — 1,866 0 2
21 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10 1981 36–25 59.0% — 1,934 0 2
22 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,117 0 14 1982 27–19 58.7% — 1,899 0 2
23 1986 47–15 75.8% #5 2,194 0 16 1983 11–9 55.0% — 1,897 0 2
24 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,254 0 20 1984 1–2 33.3% — 1,873 0 2
25 1988 58–14 80.6% #5 2,188 0 24 1985 10–4 71.4% — 1,899 0 3
26 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,955 0 24 1986 8–13 38.1% — 1,701 0 3
27 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,911 0 24 1987 15–9 62.5% — 1,779 0 3
28 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,822 0 24 1988 8–8 50.0% — 1,773 0 3
29 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,858 0 24 1989 10–6 62.5% — 1,848 0 3
30 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24 1990 16–14 53.3% — 1,827 0 3
31 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24 1991 8–5 61.5% — 1,820 0 3
32 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24 — — — — — — —
33 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24 — — — — — — —
34 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24 — — — — — — —