H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Pam Shriver vs Barbara Paulus H2H: 0-1

Barbara Paulus holds a 1–0 lead over Pam Shriver in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Barbara Paulus leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbara Paulus won the 1996 Auckland fourth round 6-2 3-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Barbara Paulus
AUT Age 55 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 5, 1996* Auckland WTA 250 R16 Hard Barbara Paulus #28 6-2 3-6 6-3 Pam Shriver #123 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,302 624 277 69.3% 0 0 0 4 20 24
Barbara Paulus #347 #10 1,696 1,956 229 138 62.4% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Shriver Barbara Paulus
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,849 0 1 1986 4–3 57.1% #165 1,528 0 0
16 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,798 0 1 1987 11–10 52.4% #70 1,594 0 0
17 1980 47–21 69.1% — 2,027 0 2 1988 19–10 65.5% #27 1,730 0 1
18 1981 58–25 69.9% — 2,122 0 4 1989 30–16 65.2% #24 1,831 0 1
19 1982 47–19 71.2% — 2,087 0 5 1990 32–14 69.6% #15 1,894 0 2
20 1983 52–15 77.6% — 2,161 0 8 1991 17–13 56.7% #25 1,868 0 2
21 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10 1992 3–7 30.0% #209 1,734 0 2
22 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,117 0 14 — — — — — — —
23 1986 47–15 75.8% #5 2,194 0 16 1994 5–7 41.7% #108 1,668 0 2
24 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,254 0 20 1995 21–7 75.0% #23 1,802 0 4
25 1988 58–14 80.6% #5 2,188 0 24 1996 38–16 70.4% #13 1,876 0 5
26 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,955 0 24 1997 32–16 66.7% #24 1,860 0 6
27 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,911 0 24 1998 17–19 47.2% #45 1,745 0 6
28 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,822 0 24 — — — — — — —
29 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,858 0 24 — — — — — — —
30 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24 — — — — — — —
31 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24 — — — — — — —
32 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24 — — — — — — —
33 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24 — — — — — — —
34 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24 — — — — — — —