H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Pam Shriver vs Carling Bassett Seguso H2H: 2-0

Pam Shriver holds a 2–0 lead over Carling Bassett Seguso in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pam Shriver leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1986 Virginia Slims Championships 1 fourth round 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Carling Bassett Seguso
Age 58 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 17, 1986 Virginia Slims Championships 1 WTA Finals R16 Carpet Pam Shriver #6 6-3 6-0 Carling Bassett Seguso Match data
Dec 10, 1983* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Grass Pam Shriver 6-0 6-1 Carling Bassett Seguso Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,302 624 277 69.3% 0 0 0 4 20 24
Carling Bassett Seguso — — — 2,009 149 101 59.6% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Shriver Carling Bassett Seguso
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1982 2–3 40.0% — 1,521 0 0
15 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,849 0 1 1983 35–21 62.5% — 1,828 0 1
16 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,798 0 1 1984 37–20 64.9% — 1,939 0 1
17 1980 47–21 69.1% — 2,027 0 2 1985 30–17 63.8% — 1,881 0 1
18 1981 58–25 69.9% — 2,122 0 4 1986 18–12 60.0% — 1,847 0 1
19 1982 47–19 71.2% — 2,087 0 5 1987 16–12 57.1% — 1,831 0 2
20 1983 52–15 77.6% — 2,161 0 8 1988 4–6 40.0% — 1,783 0 2
21 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10 1989 3–4 42.9% — 1,765 0 2
22 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,117 0 14 1990 3–3 50.0% — 1,768 0 2
23 1986 47–15 75.8% #5 2,194 0 16 — — — — — — —
24 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,254 0 20 1992 1–3 25.0% — 1,735 0 2
25 1988 58–14 80.6% #5 2,188 0 24 — — — — — — —
26 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,955 0 24 — — — — — — —
27 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,911 0 24 — — — — — — —
28 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,822 0 24 — — — — — — —
29 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,858 0 24 — — — — — — —
30 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24 — — — — — — —
31 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24 — — — — — — —
32 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24 — — — — — — —
33 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24 — — — — — — —
34 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24 — — — — — — —