H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Pam Shriver vs Catarina Lindqvist Ryan H2H: 3-4 (incl. walkovers)

Pam Shriver vs Catarina Lindqvist Ryan: 3–3 excluding walkovers; 3–4 including 1 walkover. Across 7 main-draw results including walkovers, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan leads 3–2 on grass, while Pam Shriver leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan won the 1989 Australian Open round of 32 0-6 6-4 8-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H including walkovers
3 – 4
7 main-draw results
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan
SWE Age 63 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan 0-6 6-4 8-6 Pam Shriver #5 Match data Jan 22, 1989* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan (w/o) Pam Shriver #3 Match data Jun 17, 1988* R16 Eastbourne Open WTA 250 Grass
Pam Shriver #4 6-4 6-1 Catarina Lindqvist Ryan Match data Jan 9, 1988* QF Sydney International WTA 500 Grass
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan 6-3 6-1 Pam Shriver #6 Match data Jan 23, 1987* QF Australian Open Grand Slam Grass
Pam Shriver #5 6-4 6-2 Catarina Lindqvist Ryan Match data Jan 10, 1987* QF Sydney International WTA 500 Grass
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan 3-6 6-3 6-2 Pam Shriver #4 Match data Dec 4, 1985* R16 Australian Open Grand Slam Grass
Pam Shriver #4 6-1 7-5 Catarina Lindqvist Ryan Match data Oct 20, 1985* F Porsche Tennis Grand Prix WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,304 626 278 69.2% 0 0 0 5 19 24
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan — — — 1,989 261 192 57.6% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Shriver Catarina Lindqvist Ryan
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,838 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,813 0 1 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,487 0 0
17 1980 47–21 69.1% #9 2,054 0 2 — — — — — — —
18 1981 58–25 69.9% #7 2,137 0 4 1981 2–5 28.6% — 1,487 0 0
19 1982 47–19 71.2% #6 2,098 0 5 1982 5–10 33.3% — 1,475 0 0
20 1983 52–15 77.6% #4 2,162 0 8 1983 4–4 50.0% — 1,523 0 0
21 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10 1984 28–16 63.6% — 1,789 0 2
22 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,118 0 14 1985 44–18 71.0% — 1,974 0 3
23 1986 47–15 75.8% #6 2,196 0 16 1986 28–22 56.0% — 1,881 0 3
24 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,255 0 20 1987 34–20 63.0% — 1,872 0 3
25 1988 60–15 80.0% #5 2,197 0 24 1988 29–23 55.8% — 1,795 0 3
26 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,960 0 24 1989 29–19 60.4% — 1,783 0 3
27 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,915 0 24 1990 19–16 54.3% — 1,726 0 4
28 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,823 0 24 1991 25–22 53.2% — 1,715 0 5
29 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,857 0 24 1992 14–16 46.7% — 1,637 0 5
30 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24 — — — — — — —
31 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24 — — — — — — —
32 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24 — — — — — — —
33 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24 — — — — — — —
34 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pam Shriver Catarina Lindqvist Ryan
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1978 6 1 7 85.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1980 22 7 29 75.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 9 7 16 56.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1981 15 5 20 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 19 3 22 86.4% 18 15 33 54.5% 1981 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1982 11 4 15 73.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 18 9 27 66.7% 1982 0 4 4 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — —
20 1983 17 3 20 85.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 13 3 16 81.3% 20 8 28 71.4% 1983 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1984 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 15 4 19 78.9% 19 6 25 76.0% 1984 18 4 22 81.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 1985 14 3 17 82.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 19 4 23 82.6% 19 4 23 82.6% 1985 17 5 22 77.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 14 5 19 73.7%
23 1986 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 10 1 11 90.9% 23 9 32 71.9% 1986 9 6 15 60.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 9 9 18 50.0%
24 1987 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — 30 5 35 85.7% 17 5 22 77.3% 1987 11 6 17 64.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 12 5 17 70.6% 6 5 11 54.5%
25 1988 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 24 4 28 85.7% 16 3 19 84.2% 1988 18 13 31 58.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 4 7 42.9%
26 1989 12 7 19 63.2% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1989 17 11 28 60.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
27 1990 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 1990 9 7 16 56.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
28 1991 11 11 22 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1991 10 13 23 43.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 9 4 13 69.2%
29 1992 11 9 20 55.0% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 1992 9 9 18 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
30 1993 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1994 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1995 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1996 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1997 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 196 100 296 66.2% 18 12 30 60.0% 205 61 266 77.1% 204 104 308 66.2% — 121 80 201 60.2% 38 41 79 48.1% 42 28 70 60.0% 55 39 94 58.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pam Shriver Catarina Lindqvist Ryan
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1978 1839 153.8 — — — — +104 — -258 69.2% +1.66 4–3 (57%) 7–3 (70%) 108.7 +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1979 1813 147.5 — — — — +7 — -37 57.1% +0.36 0–8 (0%) 4–2 (67%) 93.1 -0.83 1979 1487 98.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.03
17 1980 2055 163.4 — — — — -49 -406 -67 68.7% +1.41 11–9 (55%) 8–7 (53%) 104.9 -7.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1981 2138 166.4 — — — — -89 -332 -9 71.3% +1.67 4–10 (29%) 10–6 (63%) 96.8 -6.74 1981 1488 105.4 — — — — — — — 37.5% -1.19 0–2 2–0 — +0.21
19 1982 2099 161.9 — — — — -1 -284 +23 69.7% +1.63 7–7 (50%) 7–5 (58%) 102.0 -2.82 1982 1475 107.8 — — — — +48 +48 — 38.2% -1.03 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.48
20 1983 2163 167.8 — — — — +33 -321 +16 73.1% +1.83 11–6 (65%) 7–5 (58%) 101.0 -4.79 1983 1524 102.9 — — — — +40 — — 44.4% +0.06 2–0 0–1 — +0.40
21 1984 2061 163.5 — — — — +77 — +84 75.8% +1.98 4–8 (33%) 7–2 (78%) 94.6 -0.74 1984 1790 134.0 — — — — +46 -198 -179 61.8% +0.63 7–7 (50%) 6–2 (75%) 104.4 +0.87
22 1985 2119 161.1 — — — — +48 -302 +85 75.7% +1.82 10–4 (71%) 13–7 (65%) 101.9 +0.23 1985 1975 162.0 — — — — +82 -345 -300 67.9% +1.41 9–7 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 105.1 -1.46
23 1986 2196 175.2 — — — — +23 — +26 75.9% +2.04 2–7 (22%) 7–4 (64%) 95.5 -4.63 1986 1882 146.6 — — — — +39 -212 -145 53.9% +0.50 11–8 (58%) 3–7 (30%) 100.6 -0.51
24 1987 2256 167.4 — — — — -1 — +39 78.5% +2.08 8–4 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 -3.44 1987 1873 150.2 — — — — +27 -182 +26 60.2% +0.81 7–3 (70%) 8–2 (80%) 108.4 +0.96
25 1988 2197 167.5 — — — — +37 — +105 76.5% +1.85 11–5 (69%) 8–6 (57%) 98.7 -3.71 1988 1796 140.3 — — — — +23 -122 +73 53.3% +0.22 10–10 (50%) 7–6 (54%) 97.1 -0.66
26 1989 1961 141.0 — — — — +38 — +226 60.0% +0.72 8–6 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 92.2 +0.34 1989 1784 144.8 — — — — -16 -119 +141 58.3% +0.58 10–9 (53%) 9–4 (69%) 101.1 -0.14
27 1990 1915 136.1 — — — — +25 — — 58.6% +0.83 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.41 1990 1726 134.9 — — — — +39 -38 +188 55.6% +0.40 4–7 (36%) 3–1 (75%) 95.7 +2.94
28 1991 1823 146.6 — — — — -5 — +351 56.0% +0.62 1–5 (17%) 2–8 (20%) 88.5 -2.30 1991 1715 132.5 — — — — +17 -28 +190 53.5% +0.22 5–6 (45%) 4–3 (57%) 97.5 +3.85
29 1992 1857 156.5 — — — — +5 — +328 56.4% +0.71 5–3 (63%) 4–5 (44%) 101.5 -2.50 1992 1637 122.8 — — — — +57 — +258 44.4% -0.27 3–0 (100%) 4–1 (80%) 105.9 +2.19
30 1993 1820 148.3 — — — — +6 — +300 52.5% +0.05 4–7 (36%) 3–2 (60%) 95.2 -1.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1994 1700 125.8 — — — — +6 — +296 48.5% -0.04 5–7 (42%) 3–3 (50%) 95.7 +0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1995 1649 116.2 — — — — -2 — +277 38.1% -0.64 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1996 1611 115.9 — — — — -22 — +337 39.3% -0.79 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1997 1636 111.8 — — — — -20 — — 57.1% +0.86 1–0 0–2 — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2304 166.5 — — — — +10 -331 +78 67.8% +1.37 103–105 (50%) 102–76 (57%) 97.2 -4.47 — 1990 146.8 — — — — +35 -131 -2 56.2% +0.47 69–62 (53%) 48–30 (62%) 107.5 +2.01

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.