H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Pam Shriver vs Catherine Tanvier H2H: 1-1

Pam Shriver and Catherine Tanvier are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Catherine Tanvier leads 1–0 on carpet, while Pam Shriver leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Catherine Tanvier won the 1985 Princeton quarterfinal 7-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Catherine Tanvier
FRA Age 61 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 9, 1985* Princeton WTA 250 QF Carpet Catherine Tanvier #28 7-6 6-3 Pam Shriver #9 Match data
Nov 20, 1982* Brisbane WTA 500 QF Grass Pam Shriver 6-4 6-3 Catherine Tanvier Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,302 624 277 69.3% 0 0 0 4 20 24
Catherine Tanvier #752 #20 22 1,877 161 179 47.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Shriver Catherine Tanvier
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,849 0 1 1980 4–2 66.7% — 1,545 0 0
16 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,798 0 1 1981 6–14 30.0% — 1,540 0 0
17 1980 47–21 69.1% — 2,027 0 2 1982 23–19 54.8% — 1,791 0 0
18 1981 58–25 69.9% — 2,122 0 4 1983 17–16 51.5% — 1,824 0 0
19 1982 47–19 71.2% — 2,087 0 5 1984 21–18 53.8% #30 1,777 0 0
20 1983 52–15 77.6% — 2,161 0 8 1985 18–16 52.9% #39 1,775 0 0
21 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10 1986 19–17 52.8% #37 1,825 0 0
22 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,117 0 14 1987 10–19 34.5% #96 1,618 0 0
23 1986 47–15 75.8% #5 2,194 0 16 1988 9–16 36.0% #77 1,602 0 0
24 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,254 0 20 1989 12–12 50.0% #65 1,673 0 0
25 1988 58–14 80.6% #5 2,188 0 24 1990 9–11 45.0% #99 1,658 0 0
26 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,955 0 24 1991 7–10 41.2% #104 1,603 0 0
27 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,911 0 24 1992 6–7 46.2% #105 1,614 0 0
28 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,822 0 24 1993 0–2 0.0% #543 1,578 0 0
29 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,858 0 24 — — — — — — —
30 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24 — — — — — — —
31 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24 — — — — — — —
32 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24 — — — — — — —
33 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24 — — — — — — —
34 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24 — — — — — — —