H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Pam Shriver vs Claudia Porwik H2H: 3-0

Pam Shriver holds a 3–0 lead over Claudia Porwik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Pam Shriver leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1989 Los Angeles fourth round 4-6 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Claudia Porwik
GER Age 57

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 11, 1989* Los Angeles WTA 500 R16 Hard Pam Shriver #9 4-6 6-3 6-0 Claudia Porwik #92 Match data
Jan 2, 1988* Brisbane WTA 500 QF Grass Pam Shriver #4 6-2 6-2 Claudia Porwik #104 Match data
Oct 15, 1987* Filderstadt WTA 250 R32 Carpet Pam Shriver #5 6-3 6-2 Claudia Porwik #99 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,302 624 277 69.3% 0 0 0 4 20 24
Claudia Porwik #579 #29 148 1,788 114 146 43.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Shriver Claudia Porwik
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,849 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,798 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1980 47–21 69.1% — 2,027 0 2 1986 6–5 54.5% #96 1,576 0 0
18 1981 58–25 69.9% — 2,122 0 4 1987 13–19 40.6% #104 1,582 0 0
19 1982 47–19 71.2% — 2,087 0 5 1988 11–16 40.7% #68 1,572 0 0
20 1983 52–15 77.6% — 2,161 0 8 1989 19–18 51.4% #75 1,662 0 0
21 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10 1990 18–17 51.4% #29 1,667 0 0
22 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,117 0 14 1991 14–20 41.2% #80 1,645 0 0
23 1986 47–15 75.8% #5 2,194 0 16 1992 12–18 40.0% #98 1,599 0 0
24 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,254 0 20 1993 13–20 39.4% #92 1,599 0 0
25 1988 58–14 80.6% #5 2,188 0 24 1994 0–1 0.0% #256 1,583 0 0
26 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,955 0 24 1995 4–7 36.4% #133 1,550 0 0
27 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,911 0 24 1996 4–5 44.4% #153 1,562 0 0
28 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,822 0 24 — — — — — — —
29 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,858 0 24 — — — — — — —
30 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24 — — — — — — —
31 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24 — — — — — — —
32 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24 — — — — — — —
33 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24 — — — — — — —
34 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24 — — — — — — —