H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Pam Shriver vs Dianne Van Rensburg H2H: 4-1

Pam Shriver holds a 4–1 lead over Dianne Van Rensburg in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Pam Shriver leads 3–0 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Dianne Van Rensburg won the 1990 Boca Raton fourth round 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Dianne Van Rensburg
Age 58

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 9, 1990* Boca Raton WTA 250 R16 Hard Dianne Van Rensburg 7-5 6-1 Pam Shriver #14 Match data
Jun 22, 1988* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Pam Shriver #4 6-2 4-6 8-6 Dianne Van Rensburg Match data
Jun 10, 1988* Birmingham WTA 250 R16 Grass Pam Shriver #3 6-3 7-5 Dianne Van Rensburg Match data
Jun 12, 1987* Birmingham WTA 250 R16 Grass Pam Shriver #6 6-2 6-3 Dianne Van Rensburg Match data
Feb 19, 1987* Boca Raton WTA 250 R32 Hard Pam Shriver #5 6-3 6-2 Dianne Van Rensburg Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,302 624 277 69.3% 0 0 0 4 20 24
Dianne Van Rensburg — — — 1,790 82 92 47.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Shriver Dianne Van Rensburg
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,849 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,798 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1980 47–21 69.1% — 2,027 0 2 — — — — — — —
18 1981 58–25 69.9% — 2,122 0 4 1986 10–8 55.6% — 1,643 0 0
19 1982 47–19 71.2% — 2,087 0 5 1987 11–19 36.7% — 1,597 0 0
20 1983 52–15 77.6% — 2,161 0 8 1988 17–19 47.2% — 1,701 0 0
21 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10 1989 15–20 42.9% — 1,653 0 0
22 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,117 0 14 1990 23–16 59.0% — 1,770 0 1
23 1986 47–15 75.8% #5 2,194 0 16 — — — — — — —
24 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,254 0 20 1992 0–1 0.0% — 1,748 0 1
25 1988 58–14 80.6% #5 2,188 0 24 1993 3–4 42.9% — 1,730 0 1
26 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,955 0 24 1994 3–4 42.9% — 1,696 0 1
27 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,911 0 24 1995 0–1 0.0% — 1,672 0 1
28 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,822 0 24 — — — — — — —
29 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,858 0 24 — — — — — — —
30 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24 — — — — — — —
31 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24 — — — — — — —
32 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24 — — — — — — —
33 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24 — — — — — — —
34 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24 — — — — — — —