H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Pam Shriver vs Etsuko Inoue H2H: 6-0

Pam Shriver holds a 6–0 lead over Etsuko Inoue in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Pam Shriver leads 4–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1989 Key Biscayne first round 5-7 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
6 – 0
6 main draw meetings
Etsuko Inoue
JPN Age 61 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 21, 1989* Key Biscayne WTA 250 R128 Hard Pam Shriver #6 5-7 7-5 6-3 Etsuko Inoue #68 Match data
Jan 13, 1989* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Hard Pam Shriver #5 6-2 6-3 Etsuko Inoue #50 Match data
Jun 13, 1987* Birmingham WTA 250 SF Grass Pam Shriver #6 6-2 6-4 Etsuko Inoue #40 Match data
Aug 7, 1986* Montreal WTA 1000 R32 Hard Pam Shriver #6 6-0 6-2 Etsuko Inoue #72 Match data
Jun 14, 1986* Birmingham WTA 250 QF Grass Pam Shriver #6 6-1 6-4 Etsuko Inoue #106 Match data
Aug 17, 1984* Mahwah WTA 250 R16 Hard Pam Shriver #4 7-6 6-1 Etsuko Inoue #61 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,302 624 277 69.3% 0 0 0 4 20 24
Etsuko Inoue #310 #26 27 1,803 120 132 47.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Shriver Etsuko Inoue
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,849 0 1 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,487 0 0
16 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,798 0 1 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0
17 1980 47–21 69.1% — 2,027 0 2 1982 3–2 60.0% — 1,523 0 0
18 1981 58–25 69.9% — 2,122 0 4 1983 17–15 53.1% — 1,642 0 1
19 1982 47–19 71.2% — 2,087 0 5 1984 19–19 50.0% #68 1,700 0 2
20 1983 52–15 77.6% — 2,161 0 8 1985 13–21 38.2% #70 1,633 0 2
21 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10 1986 9–14 39.1% #80 1,636 0 2
22 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,117 0 14 1987 20–15 57.1% #30 1,765 0 2
23 1986 47–15 75.8% #5 2,194 0 16 1988 11–13 45.8% #52 1,729 0 2
24 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,254 0 20 1989 15–18 45.5% #68 1,678 0 2
25 1988 58–14 80.6% #5 2,188 0 24 1990 13–13 50.0% #70 1,665 0 2
26 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,955 0 24 — — — — — — —
27 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,911 0 24 — — — — — — —
28 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,822 0 24 — — — — — — —
29 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,858 0 24 — — — — — — —
30 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24 — — — — — — —
31 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24 — — — — — — —
32 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24 — — — — — — —
33 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24 — — — — — — —
34 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24 — — — — — — —