H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Pam Shriver vs Heather Ludloff H2H: 2-0

Pam Shriver holds a 2–0 lead over Heather Ludloff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pam Shriver leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1992 Eastbourne third round 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Heather Ludloff
USA Age 65 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 18, 1992* Eastbourne WTA 250 R32 Grass Pam Shriver #31 6-3 6-1 Heather Ludloff #144 Match data
Jul 18, 1985* Newport WTA 250 R32 Grass Pam Shriver #5 6-1 6-2 Heather Ludloff #127 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,302 624 277 69.3% 0 0 0 4 20 24
Heather Ludloff #512 #69 11 1,576 48 106 31.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Shriver Heather Ludloff
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,849 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,798 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1980 47–21 69.1% — 2,027 0 2 1978 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0
18 1981 58–25 69.9% — 2,122 0 4 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0
19 1982 47–19 71.2% — 2,087 0 5 1980 2–5 28.6% — 1,465 0 0
20 1983 52–15 77.6% — 2,161 0 8 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,440 0 0
21 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10 1982 3–4 42.9% — 1,473 0 0
22 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,117 0 14 1983 7–15 31.8% — 1,516 0 0
23 1986 47–15 75.8% #5 2,194 0 16 1984 6–9 40.0% #129 1,546 0 0
24 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,254 0 20 1985 2–12 14.3% #127 1,489 0 0
25 1988 58–14 80.6% #5 2,188 0 24 1986 0–1 0.0% #192 1,475 0 0
26 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,955 0 24 1987 12–16 42.9% #74 1,543 0 0
27 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,911 0 24 1988 6–14 30.0% #123 1,505 0 0
28 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,822 0 24 1989 4–9 30.8% #164 1,468 0 0
29 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,858 0 24 1990 2–6 25.0% #219 1,456 0 0
30 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24 1991 3–5 37.5% #141 1,503 0 0
31 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24 1992 1–6 14.3% #282 1,472 0 0
32 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24 — — — — — — —
33 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24 — — — — — — —
34 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24 — — — — — — —