H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Pam Shriver vs Helena Sukova H2H: 9-3
Pam Shriver holds a 9–3 lead over Helena Sukova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 12 main-draw meetings, Pam Shriver leads 4–1 on carpet and 4–1 on grass. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1994 Tokyo Pan Pacific third round 6-1 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 64
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
9
–
3
12 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 61
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 1994* | Tokyo Pan Pacific | WTA 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Pam Shriver | 6-1 3-6 6-3 | Helena Sukova | Match data |
| Oct 11, 1991* | Zurich | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Helena Sukova | 3-6 7-6 6-4 | Pam Shriver | Match data |
| Jun 20, 1991* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Pam Shriver | 7-5 6-4 | Helena Sukova | Match data |
| May 1, 1988* | Tokyo Pan Pacific | WTA 250 | F | Carpet | Pam Shriver | 7-5 6-1 | Helena Sukova | Match data |
| Feb 22, 1988 | Washington | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Pam Shriver | 6-2 7-5 | Helena Sukova | Match data |
| Jan 10, 1988* | Sydney | WTA 500 | F | Grass | Pam Shriver | 6-2 6-3 | Helena Sukova | Match data |
| Nov 7, 1987* | Worcester | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Pam Shriver | 6-4 6-4 | Helena Sukova | Match data |
| Jul 3, 1987* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | QF | Grass | Pam Shriver | 4-6 7-6 10-8 | Helena Sukova | Match data |
| Aug 10, 1986* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | F | Hard | Helena Sukova | 6-2 7-5 | Pam Shriver | Match data |
| Jan 18, 1986* | Worcester | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Pam Shriver | 6-4 6-3 | Helena Sukova | Match data |
| Nov 16, 1985* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | SF | Grass | Pam Shriver | 7-6 1-6 6-2 | Helena Sukova | Match data |
| Dec 7, 1984* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | QF | Grass | Helena Sukova | 6-2 6-7(5) 6-1 | Pam Shriver | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pam Shriver | #234 | #3 | 163 | 2,302 | 624 | 277 | 69.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 20 | 24 |
| Helena Sukova | #102 | #4 | 735 | 2,217 | 580 | 297 | 66.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pam Shriver | Helena Sukova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1978 | 23–8 | 74.2% | — | 1,849 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1979 | 16–16 | 50.0% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1980 | 47–21 | 69.1% | — | 2,027 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,757 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1981 | 58–25 | 69.9% | — | 2,122 | 0 | 4 | 1983 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,907 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1982 | 47–19 | 71.2% | — | 2,087 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 48–23 | 67.6% | #7 | 2,041 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1983 | 52–15 | 77.6% | — | 2,161 | 0 | 8 | 1985 | 54–21 | 72.0% | #9 | 2,028 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1984 | 44–13 | 77.2% | #4 | 2,060 | 0 | 10 | 1986 | 69–21 | 76.7% | #6 | 2,151 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1985 | 54–13 | 80.6% | #4 | 2,117 | 0 | 14 | 1987 | 58–19 | 75.3% | #7 | 2,129 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1986 | 47–15 | 75.8% | #5 | 2,194 | 0 | 16 | 1988 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #8 | 2,120 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1987 | 60–13 | 82.2% | #4 | 2,254 | 0 | 20 | 1989 | 39–15 | 72.2% | #8 | 2,043 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 1988 | 58–14 | 80.6% | #5 | 2,188 | 0 | 24 | 1990 | 41–17 | 70.7% | #14 | 2,025 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1989 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #18 | 1,955 | 0 | 24 | 1991 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #17 | 1,958 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 1990 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #66 | 1,911 | 0 | 24 | 1992 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 1,976 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 1991 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #37 | 1,822 | 0 | 24 | 1993 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #17 | 1,925 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 1992 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #30 | 1,858 | 0 | 24 | 1994 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,889 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | 1993 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #38 | 1,819 | 0 | 24 | 1995 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | 1994 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #63 | 1,699 | 0 | 24 | 1996 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #35 | 1,792 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | 1995 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #110 | 1,649 | 0 | 24 | 1997 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 9 |
| 33 | 1996 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #189 | 1,611 | 0 | 24 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #102 | 1,637 | 0 | 9 |
| 34 | 1997 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #234 | 1,635 | 0 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |