H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Pam Shriver vs Jo Durie H2H: 9-2

Pam Shriver holds a 9–2 lead over Jo Durie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 11 main-draw meetings, Pam Shriver leads 5–0 on grass and 2–1 on carpet. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1991 San Diego round of 32 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
9 – 2
11 main-draw meetings
Jo Durie
GBR Age 66 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pam Shriver #33 6-3 6-4 Jo Durie #132 Match data Aug 1, 1991* R32 San Diego Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Pam Shriver #6 6-1 6-2 Jo Durie #28 Match data Jan 21, 1987* R16 Australian Open Grand Slam Grass
Pam Shriver 7-6 3-6 7-5 Jo Durie Match data Nov 19, 1983* SF Brisbane International WTA 500 Grass
Jo Durie 7-5 6-4 Pam Shriver Match data Oct 22, 1983* SF Brighton WTA 250 Carpet
Jo Durie 6-2 (ret.) Pam Shriver Match data May 29, 1983* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Pam Shriver 6-4 6-3 Jo Durie Match data Mar 12, 1983* QF Dallas WTA 250 Carpet
Pam Shriver 6-4 6-4 Jo Durie Match data Feb 24, 1983* R32 Oakland WTA 250 Carpet
Pam Shriver 6-1 6-4 Jo Durie Match data Aug 26, 1982* R32 Mahwah WTA 250 Hard
Pam Shriver 6-3 6-2 Jo Durie Match data Dec 9, 1981* R16 Australian Open Grand Slam Grass
Pam Shriver 6-3 6-4 Jo Durie Match data Jul 1, 1981* R16 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Pam Shriver 6-3 6-1 Jo Durie Match data Jun 12, 1980* R16 Chichester WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,304 626 278 69.2% 0 0 0 5 19 24
Jo Durie #302 #5 31 2,101 311 263 54.2% 0 0 0 1 8 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Shriver Jo Durie
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 0
15 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,838 0 1 1976 5–6 45.5% — 1,503 0 0
16 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,813 0 1 1977 11–7 61.1% — 1,602 0 0
17 1980 47–21 69.1% #9 2,054 0 2 1978 15–9 62.5% — 1,619 0 1
18 1981 58–25 69.9% #7 2,137 0 4 1979 15–8 65.2% — 1,713 0 3
19 1982 47–19 71.2% #6 2,098 0 5 1980 21–14 60.0% — 1,733 0 4
20 1983 52–15 77.6% #4 2,162 0 8 1981 30–14 68.2% — 1,859 0 7
21 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10 1982 25–20 55.6% — 1,841 0 7
22 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,118 0 14 1983 47–18 72.3% #6 2,094 0 9
23 1986 47–15 75.8% #6 2,196 0 16 1984 16–15 51.6% #24 1,890 0 9
24 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,255 0 20 1985 17–19 47.2% #26 1,800 0 9
25 1988 60–15 80.0% #5 2,197 0 24 1986 24–17 58.5% #24 1,841 0 9
26 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,960 0 24 1987 10–17 37.0% #73 1,741 0 9
27 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,915 0 24 1988 19–19 50.0% #60 1,702 0 9
28 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,823 0 24 1989 8–13 38.1% #117 1,621 0 9
29 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,857 0 24 1990 13–13 50.0% #64 1,673 0 9
30 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24 1991 15–18 45.5% #62 1,708 0 9
31 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24 1992 13–16 44.8% #59 1,688 0 9
32 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24 1993 4–12 25.0% #192 1,563 0 9
33 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24 1994 1–4 20.0% #348 1,555 0 9
34 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24 1995 1–3 25.0% #292 1,548 0 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pam Shriver Jo Durie
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
15 1978 6 1 7 85.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
16 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 1977 — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
17 1980 22 7 29 75.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 9 7 16 56.3% 1978 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
18 1981 15 5 20 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 19 3 22 86.4% 18 15 33 54.5% 1979 — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1982 11 4 15 73.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 18 9 27 66.7% 1980 — — — — 13 6 19 68.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 4 4 0.0%
20 1983 17 3 20 85.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 13 3 16 81.3% 20 8 28 71.4% 1981 4 2 6 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0%
21 1984 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 15 4 19 78.9% 19 6 25 76.0% 1982 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 6 8 14 42.9%
22 1985 14 3 17 82.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 19 4 23 82.6% 19 4 23 82.6% 1983 12 3 15 80.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 16 4 20 80.0% 10 8 18 55.6%
23 1986 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 10 1 11 90.9% 23 9 32 71.9% 1984 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1%
24 1987 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — 30 5 35 85.7% 17 5 22 77.3% 1985 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 1988 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 24 4 28 85.7% 16 3 19 84.2% 1986 10 6 16 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 7 6 13 53.8%
26 1989 12 7 19 63.2% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1987 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
27 1990 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 1988 9 9 18 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 1991 11 11 22 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1989 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1992 11 9 20 55.0% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 1990 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 7 4 11 63.6% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 1993 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1991 7 9 16 43.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
31 1994 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 1992 3 7 10 30.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0%
32 1995 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 1993 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0%
33 1996 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
34 1997 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
Career — 196 100 296 66.2% 18 12 30 60.0% 205 61 266 77.1% 204 104 308 66.2% — 73 75 148 49.3% 57 45 102 55.9% 103 72 175 58.9% 50 65 115 43.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pam Shriver Jo Durie
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1499 100.0 — — — — — — — 40.0% +0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.55
15 1978 1839 153.8 — — — — +104 — -258 69.2% +1.66 4–3 (57%) 7–3 (70%) 108.7 +0.06 1976 1503 107.8 — — — — +73 — +94 54.2% +0.71 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — +3.14
16 1979 1813 147.5 — — — — +7 — -37 57.1% +0.36 0–8 (0%) 4–2 (67%) 93.1 -0.83 1977 1602 121.5 — — — — — -35 +40 56.1% +0.71 4–1 (80%) 0–1 — +2.47
17 1980 2055 163.4 — — — — -49 -406 -67 68.7% +1.41 11–9 (55%) 8–7 (53%) 104.9 -7.03 1978 1619 121.0 — — — — +18 — -9 57.4% +0.50 5–1 (83%) 1–2 (33%) 104.3 +2.99
18 1981 2138 166.4 — — — — -89 -332 -9 71.3% +1.67 4–10 (29%) 10–6 (63%) 96.8 -6.74 1979 1714 129.5 — — — — — -76 -94 58.5% +0.36 6–1 (86%) 6–2 (75%) 110.0 +0.87
19 1982 2099 161.9 — — — — -1 -284 +23 69.7% +1.63 7–7 (50%) 7–5 (58%) 102.0 -2.82 1980 1734 122.7 — — — — -184 -10 -56 61.7% +0.60 5–8 (38%) 4–1 (80%) 99.6 +0.68
20 1983 2163 167.8 — — — — +33 -321 +16 73.1% +1.83 11–6 (65%) 7–5 (58%) 101.0 -4.79 1981 1859 136.3 — — — — -159 -77 -116 60.8% +0.60 12–2 (86%) 4–1 (80%) 113.5 -0.98
21 1984 2061 163.5 — — — — +77 — +84 75.8% +1.98 4–8 (33%) 7–2 (78%) 94.6 -0.74 1982 1841 141.1 — — — — -59 -75 -37 55.1% +0.21 8–9 (47%) 2–4 (33%) 97.4 -2.62
22 1985 2119 161.1 — — — — +48 -302 +85 75.7% +1.82 10–4 (71%) 13–7 (65%) 101.9 +0.23 1983 2095 159.8 — — — — -75 -184 -99 69.3% +1.31 7–5 (58%) 3–2 (60%) 104.6 -5.64
23 1986 2196 175.2 — — — — +23 — +26 75.9% +2.04 2–7 (22%) 7–4 (64%) 95.5 -4.63 1984 1891 136.3 — — — — +11 -59 +84 49.3% +0.53 7–4 (64%) 1–5 (17%) 95.2 +0.18
24 1987 2256 167.4 — — — — -1 — +39 78.5% +2.08 8–4 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 -3.44 1985 1800 133.3 — — — — +15 -48 +123 48.8% +0.06 7–7 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 96.7 -1.37
25 1988 2197 167.5 — — — — +37 — +105 76.5% +1.85 11–5 (69%) 8–6 (57%) 98.7 -3.71 1986 1842 140.0 — — — — +2 -79 +45 55.7% +0.21 11–6 (65%) 8–3 (73%) 105.1 -3.56
26 1989 1961 141.0 — — — — +38 — +226 60.0% +0.72 8–6 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 92.2 +0.34 1987 1741 134.1 — — — — +30 -30 +108 41.0% -0.69 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 96.3 -2.72
27 1990 1915 136.1 — — — — +25 — — 58.6% +0.83 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.41 1988 1703 127.8 — — — — -1 -16 +119 49.4% -0.10 6–5 (55%) 8–4 (67%) 101.9 -0.26
28 1991 1823 146.6 — — — — -5 — +351 56.0% +0.62 1–5 (17%) 2–8 (20%) 88.5 -2.30 1989 1622 126.0 — — — — -8 — +201 41.3% -0.67 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 98.1 +0.38
29 1992 1857 156.5 — — — — +5 — +328 56.4% +0.71 5–3 (63%) 4–5 (44%) 101.5 -2.50 1990 1674 130.7 — — — — -60 — +193 51.7% +0.48 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 93.4 +0.04
30 1993 1820 148.3 — — — — +6 — +300 52.5% +0.05 4–7 (36%) 3–2 (60%) 95.2 -1.73 1991 1709 132.3 — — — — +4 -111 +94 45.5% -0.12 6–7 (46%) 1–2 (33%) 100.5 +1.02
31 1994 1700 125.8 — — — — +6 — +296 48.5% -0.04 5–7 (42%) 3–3 (50%) 95.7 +0.51 1992 1689 130.7 — — — — -48 -50 +162 50.0% -0.09 3–7 (30%) 4–1 (80%) 99.1 +0.39
32 1995 1649 116.2 — — — — -2 — +277 38.1% -0.64 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 +0.26 1993 1563 107.8 — — — — -11 — — 35.9% -0.74 3–6 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 92.1 +1.33
33 1996 1611 115.9 — — — — -22 — +337 39.3% -0.79 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.33 1994 1555 106.0 — — — — — — +191 33.3% -1.42 0–2 — — -0.60
34 1997 1636 111.8 — — — — -20 — — 57.1% +0.86 1–0 0–2 — -0.20 1995 1548 107.6 — — — — — — +141 40.0% -0.60 0–2 1–0 — -0.20
Career — 2304 166.5 — — — — +10 -331 +78 67.8% +1.37 103–105 (50%) 102–76 (57%) 97.2 -4.47 — 2101 141.6 — — — — -26 -67 +43 53.6% +0.27 97–90 (52%) 53–46 (54%) 102.6 -0.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.