H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Pam Shriver vs Katerina Maleeva H2H: 5-3

Pam Shriver holds a 5–3 lead over Katerina Maleeva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Pam Shriver leads 2–1 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Katerina Maleeva won the 1993 Chicago quarterfinal 4-6 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
5 – 3
8 main draw meetings
Katerina Maleeva
BUL Age 57 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 13, 1993* Chicago WTA 250 QF Carpet Katerina Maleeva #14 4-6 6-4 6-3 Pam Shriver #24 Match data
Aug 19, 1991 Washington WTA 250 R16 Hard Katerina Maleeva #11 7-6 3-6 6-1 Pam Shriver #30 Match data
Jun 29, 1988* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Pam Shriver #4 6-2 6-2 Katerina Maleeva #15 Match data
Nov 16, 1987 Virginia Slims Championships WTA Finals R16 Carpet Pam Shriver #4 6-1 3-6 6-3 Katerina Maleeva #12 Match data
Oct 25, 1987* Brighton WTA 250 QF Carpet Pam Shriver #5 6-2 6-1 Katerina Maleeva #14 Match data
Nov 7, 1986* Worcester WTA 250 R16 Hard Pam Shriver #6 6-1 7-5 Katerina Maleeva #28 Match data
Apr 26, 1985* Orlando WTA 250 R16 Clay Katerina Maleeva #33 7-6 3-6 6-4 Pam Shriver #8 Match data
Apr 12, 1985* Hilton Head WTA 250 R16 Clay Pam Shriver #8 7-5 6-3 Katerina Maleeva #55 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,302 624 277 69.3% 0 0 0 4 20 24
Katerina Maleeva #456 #6 116 2,070 324 185 63.7% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Shriver Katerina Maleeva
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,849 0 1 1984 2–2 50.0% #93 1,528 0 0
16 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,798 0 1 1985 30–20 60.0% #28 1,813 0 2
17 1980 47–21 69.1% — 2,027 0 2 1986 24–20 54.5% #29 1,838 0 2
18 1981 58–25 69.9% — 2,122 0 4 1987 35–15 70.0% #13 1,948 0 4
19 1982 47–19 71.2% — 2,087 0 5 1988 35–16 68.6% #11 1,992 0 5
20 1983 52–15 77.6% — 2,161 0 8 1989 32–11 74.4% #15 1,940 0 8
21 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10 1990 47–16 74.6% #6 2,039 0 9
22 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,117 0 14 1991 35–16 68.6% #11 1,967 0 10
23 1986 47–15 75.8% #5 2,194 0 16 1992 30–18 62.5% #16 1,906 0 10
24 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,254 0 20 1993 28–17 62.2% #22 1,898 0 10
25 1988 58–14 80.6% #5 2,188 0 24 1994 20–16 55.6% #36 1,866 0 11
26 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,955 0 24 1995 1–11 8.3% #302 1,679 0 11
27 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,911 0 24 1996 5–7 41.7% #231 1,686 0 11
28 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,822 0 24 — — — — — — —
29 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,858 0 24 — — — — — — —
30 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24 — — — — — — —
31 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24 — — — — — — —
32 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24 — — — — — — —
33 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24 — — — — — — —
34 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24 — — — — — — —