H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Pam Shriver vs Kathy Horvath H2H: 1-0

Pam Shriver holds a 1–0 lead over Kathy Horvath in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pam Shriver leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1981 Charleston Open round of 32 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Kathy Horvath
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pam Shriver 6-3 6-3 Kathy Horvath Match data Apr 9, 1981* R32 Charleston Open WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pam Shriver — #3 163 2,304 626 278 69.2% 0 0 0 6 18 24
Kathy Horvath — #10 24 1,976 187 155 54.7% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Shriver Kathy Horvath
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1979 0–2 0.0% — 1,496 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1980 6–7 46.2% — 1,565 0 0
15 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,838 0 1 1981 34–23 59.6% — 1,860 0 2
16 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,814 0 1 1982 15–17 46.9% — 1,776 0 2
17 1980 47–21 69.1% #9 2,057 0 2 1983 39–18 68.4% — 1,931 0 4
18 1981 58–25 69.9% #7 2,140 0 4 1984 25–19 56.8% #29 1,800 0 4
19 1982 47–19 71.2% #6 2,100 0 5 1985 23–16 59.0% — 1,776 0 6
20 1983 52–15 77.6% #4 2,164 0 8 1986 16–15 51.6% #47 1,740 0 6
21 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,061 0 10 1987 18–15 54.5% #37 1,714 0 7
22 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,119 0 14 1988 9–15 37.5% #85 1,603 0 7
23 1986 47–15 75.8% #6 2,196 0 16 1989 2–8 20.0% #224 1,529 0 7
24 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,256 0 20 — — — — — — —
25 1988 60–15 80.0% #5 2,197 0 24 — — — — — — —
26 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,960 0 24 — — — — — — —
27 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,915 0 24 — — — — — — —
28 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,823 0 24 — — — — — — —
29 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,857 0 24 — — — — — — —
30 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24 — — — — — — —
31 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,700 0 24 — — — — — — —
32 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24 — — — — — — —
33 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24 — — — — — — —
34 1997 2–1 66.7% — 1,635 0 24 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pam Shriver Kathy Horvath
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
15 1978 6 1 7 85.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 1981 7 4 11 63.6% 15 8 23 65.2% — — — — 12 11 23 52.2%
16 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 1982 0 2 2 0.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 7 9 22.2%
17 1980 22 7 29 75.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 9 7 16 56.3% 1983 9 4 13 69.2% 21 11 32 65.6% — — — — 9 3 12 75.0%
18 1981 15 5 20 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 19 3 22 86.4% 18 15 33 54.5% 1984 0 5 5 0.0% 21 9 30 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
19 1982 11 4 15 73.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 18 9 27 66.7% 1985 6 5 11 54.5% 17 7 24 70.8% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0%
20 1983 17 3 20 85.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 13 3 16 81.3% 20 8 28 71.4% 1986 8 7 15 53.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
21 1984 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 15 4 19 78.9% 19 6 25 76.0% 1987 6 6 12 50.0% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1985 14 3 17 82.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 19 4 23 82.6% 19 4 23 82.6% 1988 2 5 7 28.6% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 1986 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 10 1 11 90.9% 23 9 32 71.9% 1989 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 1987 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — 30 5 35 85.7% 17 5 22 77.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1988 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 24 4 28 85.7% 16 3 19 84.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1989 12 7 19 63.2% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1990 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1991 11 11 22 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1992 11 9 20 55.0% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1993 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1994 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1995 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1996 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1997 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 196 100 296 66.2% 18 12 30 60.0% 205 61 266 77.1% 204 104 308 66.2% — 45 50 95 47.4% 111 67 178 62.4% 3 6 9 33.3% 28 32 60 46.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pam Shriver Kathy Horvath
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1497 113.4 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 0–1 — -0.25
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1565 110.9 — — — — +47 -65 — 43.3% -0.37 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 101.9 -0.11
15 1978 1839 153.8 — — — — +102 — -258 69.2% +1.66 4–3 (57%) 7–3 (70%) 108.7 +0.78 1981 1860 146.7 — — — — -39 -79 — 55.9% +0.43 12–7 (63%) 7–5 (58%) 109.3 +0.11
16 1979 1815 147.6 — — — — +5 — -40 57.1% +0.36 0–8 (0%) 4–2 (67%) 93.2 -0.54 1982 1776 143.4 — — — — -40 +61 — 52.9% +0.46 1–7 (13%) 2–3 (40%) 92.6 -3.75
17 1980 2057 163.7 — — — — -46 -407 -68 68.7% +1.41 11–9 (55%) 8–7 (53%) 105.0 -7.43 1983 1931 149.2 — — — — -63 +56 — 63.7% +0.74 9–3 (75%) 11–6 (65%) 109.3 +1.20
18 1981 2140 166.7 — — — — -89 -333 -10 71.3% +1.67 4–10 (29%) 10–6 (63%) 96.8 -6.71 1984 1800 146.8 — — — — -83 +207 — 56.1% +0.43 5–5 (50%) 3–7 (30%) 94.7 +0.22
19 1982 2100 162.2 — — — — -1 -284 +23 69.7% +1.63 7–7 (50%) 7–5 (58%) 102.0 -2.30 1985 1776 138.1 — — — — -111 +221 — 55.8% +0.24 6–2 (75%) 5–2 (71%) 104.1 -0.66
20 1983 2164 167.9 — — — — +34 -322 +15 73.1% +1.83 11–6 (65%) 7–5 (58%) 101.0 -4.97 1986 1740 130.5 — — — — -74 +185 -139 48.6% -0.18 7–3 (70%) 3–3 (50%) 104.3 -1.03
21 1984 2061 163.7 — — — — +77 — +83 75.8% +1.98 4–8 (33%) 7–2 (78%) 94.6 -0.72 1987 1714 126.0 — — — — -42 +149 — 54.1% +0.18 6–4 (60%) 3–2 (60%) 101.2 +3.31
22 1985 2119 161.3 — — — — +48 -302 +86 75.7% +1.82 10–4 (71%) 13–7 (65%) 101.9 -0.54 1988 1603 116.3 — — — — +8 +113 — 41.5% -0.64 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 94.3 +0.35
23 1986 2197 175.3 — — — — +22 — +26 75.9% +2.04 2–7 (22%) 7–4 (64%) 95.5 -5.27 1989 1530 101.0 — — — — +18 — — 33.3% -1.38 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 95.4 +0.25
24 1987 2256 167.5 — — — — 0 — +38 78.5% +2.08 8–4 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 -3.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1988 2198 167.6 — — — — +37 — +105 76.5% +1.85 11–5 (69%) 8–6 (57%) 98.7 -3.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1989 1961 141.1 — — — — +38 — +227 60.0% +0.72 8–6 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 92.2 +0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1990 1915 136.2 — — — — +25 — — 58.6% +0.83 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1991 1823 146.7 — — — — -5 — +350 56.0% +0.62 1–5 (17%) 2–8 (20%) 88.5 -2.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1992 1857 156.5 — — — — +5 — +328 56.4% +0.71 5–3 (63%) 4–5 (44%) 101.5 -2.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1993 1820 148.3 — — — — +5 — +301 52.5% +0.05 4–7 (36%) 3–2 (60%) 95.2 -1.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1994 1700 125.8 — — — — +6 — +296 48.5% -0.04 5–7 (42%) 3–3 (50%) 95.7 +0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1995 1650 116.2 — — — — -3 — +276 38.1% -0.64 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1996 1611 115.9 — — — — -22 — +337 39.3% -0.79 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1997 1636 111.8 — — — — -19 — — 57.1% +0.86 1–0 0–2 — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2304 166.7 — — — — +10 -332 +78 67.8% +1.37 103–105 (50%) 102–76 (57%) 97.2 -4.55 — 1976 144.1 — — — — -48 +106 -139 53.7% +0.21 50–40 (56%) 39–36 (52%) 103.7 -0.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.