Home
/
H2H
/
Pam Shriver vs Kathy Jordan
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Pam Shriver vs Kathy Jordan H2H: 8-4
Pam Shriver holds an 8–4 lead over Kathy Jordan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 12 main-draw meetings, Pam Shriver leads 4–3 on carpet and 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1987 Brighton semifinal 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups?
Advanced rivalry search
lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 64
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
8
–
4
12 main-draw meetings
USA
Age 66
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
Player Score Player Match Data Date Round Tournament Category Surface
Pam Shriver
#5
6-1 7-5
Kathy Jordan
#100
Match data
Oct 25, 1987*
SF
Brighton
WTA 250
Carpet
Pam Shriver
#5
6-3 6-3
Kathy Jordan
#90
Match data
Aug 21, 1987*
R16
Canadian Open
WTA 500
Hard
Pam Shriver
#5
6-3 6-0
Kathy Jordan
#59
Match data
Jul 16, 1987*
R32
Newport
WTA 250
Grass
Pam Shriver
#5
6-4 6-4
Kathy Jordan
#15
Match data
Sep 3, 1986*
R16
US Open
Grand Slam
Hard
Kathy Jordan
6-2 6-3
Pam Shriver
#4
Match data
Sep 21, 1985*
QF
Chicago
WTA 250
Carpet
Pam Shriver
#6
6-4 6-4
Kathy Jordan
Match data
May 19, 1985*
F
Melbourne
WTA 250
Carpet
Kathy Jordan
#5
2-6 6-3 6-4
Pam Shriver
#4
Match data
Jul 6, 1984*
QF
Wimbledon
Grand Slam
Grass
Pam Shriver
6-2 6-0
Kathy Jordan
Match data
May 1, 1983*
F
Atlanta
WTA 250
Hard
Pam Shriver
7-6 7-6
Kathy Jordan
Match data
Mar 14, 1981*
QF
Dallas
WTA 250
Carpet
Kathy Jordan
7-5 6-3
Pam Shriver
Match data
Feb 28, 1981*
QF
Seattle
WTA 250
Carpet
Pam Shriver
4-6 6-1 7-5
Kathy Jordan
Match data
Jan 18, 1980*
R16
Kansas City
WTA 250
Carpet
Kathy Jordan
6-1 6-7 6-3
Pam Shriver
Match data
Jan 18, 1979*
R32
Houston
WTA 250
Carpet
*
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category.
Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories.
Mapping details.
Career Comparison
Player
Current
Peak
Pts
Elo
W
L
Win %
GS
1000* including documented historical predecessor categories
Finals
500* including documented historical predecessor categories
250* including documented historical predecessor categories
Titles
Pam Shriver
#234
#3
163
2,304
626
278
69.2%
0
0
0
5
19
24
Kathy Jordan
#520
#5
44
2,093
249
155
61.6%
0
0
0
0
2
2
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
Yr W-L Win % Rank Elo GS Titles
Yr W-L Win % Rank Elo GS Titles
15
1978
23–8
74.2%
—
1,838
0
1
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
16
1979
16–16
50.0%
—
1,813
0
1
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
17
1980
47–21
69.1%
#9
2,054
0
2
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
18
1981
58–25
69.9%
#7
2,137
0
4
1978
4–3
57.1%
—
1,560
0
0
19
1982
47–19
71.2%
#6
2,098
0
5
1979
25–13
65.8%
—
1,893
0
1
20
1983
52–15
77.6%
#4
2,162
0
8
1980
37–21
63.8%
—
2,001
0
1
21
1984
44–13
77.2%
#4
2,060
0
10
1981
28–20
58.3%
—
1,921
0
1
22
1985
54–13
80.6%
#4
2,118
0
14
1982
21–18
53.8%
—
1,884
0
2
23
1986
47–15
75.8%
#6
2,196
0
16
1983
44–22
66.7%
—
2,009
0
2
24
1987
60–13
82.2%
#4
2,255
0
20
1984
23–11
67.6%
#10
2,023
0
2
25
1988
60–15
80.0%
#5
2,197
0
24
1985
28–15
65.1%
#12
1,979
0
2
26
1989
24–14
63.2%
#18
1,960
0
24
1986
25–15
62.5%
#15
1,910
0
2
27
1990
8–5
61.5%
#66
1,915
0
24
1987
12–10
54.5%
#35
1,892
0
2
28
1991
21–18
53.8%
#37
1,823
0
24
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
29
1992
25–18
58.1%
#30
1,857
0
24
1989
0–1
0.0%
—
1,874
0
2
30
1993
14–13
51.9%
#38
1,819
0
24
1990
2–6
25.0%
#207
1,791
0
2
31
1994
13–16
44.8%
#63
1,699
0
24
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
32
1995
7–11
38.9%
#110
1,649
0
24
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
33
1996
4–9
30.8%
#189
1,611
0
24
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
34
1997
2–1
66.7%
#234
1,635
0
24
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year.
Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
Yr
Yr
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
15
1978
6
1
7
85.7%
1
1
2
50.0%
3
3
6
50.0%
10
2
12
83.3%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
16
1979
2
4
6
33.3%
1
1
2
50.0%
11
6
17
64.7%
2
5
7
28.6%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
17
1980
22
7
29
75.9%
3
2
5
60.0%
13
5
18
72.2%
9
7
16
56.3%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
18
1981
15
5
20
75.0%
6
2
8
75.0%
19
3
22
86.4%
18
15
33
54.5%
1978
1
1
2
50.0%
1
1
2
50.0%
2
1
3
66.7%
—
—
—
—
19
1982
11
4
15
73.3%
3
2
5
60.0%
15
4
19
78.9%
18
9
27
66.7%
1979
12
5
17
70.6%
0
1
1
0.0%
4
2
6
66.7%
9
5
14
64.3%
20
1983
17
3
20
85.0%
2
1
3
66.7%
13
3
16
81.3%
20
8
28
71.4%
1980
10
4
14
71.4%
5
3
8
62.5%
3
2
5
60.0%
19
12
31
61.3%
21
1984
10
3
13
76.9%
—
—
—
—
15
4
19
78.9%
19
6
25
76.0%
1981
6
3
9
66.7%
3
3
6
50.0%
8
5
13
61.5%
11
9
20
55.0%
22
1985
14
3
17
82.4%
2
2
4
50.0%
19
4
23
82.6%
19
4
23
82.6%
1982
6
4
10
60.0%
3
2
5
60.0%
3
3
6
50.0%
9
9
18
50.0%
23
1986
14
5
19
73.7%
—
—
—
—
10
1
11
90.9%
23
9
32
71.9%
1983
15
5
20
75.0%
5
3
8
62.5%
14
6
20
70.0%
10
8
18
55.6%
24
1987
13
3
16
81.3%
—
—
—
—
30
5
35
85.7%
17
5
22
77.3%
1984
3
3
6
50.0%
3
3
6
50.0%
10
2
12
83.3%
7
3
10
70.0%
25
1988
20
8
28
71.4%
—
—
—
—
24
4
28
85.7%
16
3
19
84.2%
1985
12
6
18
66.7%
—
—
—
—
5
4
9
55.6%
11
5
16
68.8%
26
1989
12
7
19
63.2%
—
—
—
—
7
3
10
70.0%
5
4
9
55.6%
1986
13
6
19
68.4%
0
2
2
0.0%
6
2
8
75.0%
6
5
11
54.5%
27
1990
3
3
6
50.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
5
2
7
71.4%
1987
6
4
10
60.0%
—
—
—
—
1
3
4
25.0%
5
3
8
62.5%
28
1991
11
11
22
50.0%
—
—
—
—
7
3
10
70.0%
3
4
7
42.9%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
29
1992
11
9
20
55.0%
—
—
—
—
6
3
9
66.7%
8
6
14
57.1%
1989
0
1
1
0.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
30
1993
4
6
10
40.0%
—
—
—
—
3
2
5
60.0%
7
5
12
58.3%
1990
1
4
5
20.0%
—
—
—
—
1
2
3
33.3%
—
—
—
—
31
1994
7
7
14
50.0%
0
1
1
0.0%
4
3
7
57.1%
2
5
7
28.6%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
32
1995
1
4
5
20.0%
—
—
—
—
4
3
7
57.1%
2
4
6
33.3%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
33
1996
1
6
7
14.3%
—
—
—
—
2
2
4
50.0%
1
1
2
50.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
34
1997
2
1
3
66.7%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Career
—
196
100
296
66.2%
18
12
30
60.0%
205
61
266
77.1%
204
104
308
66.2%
—
85
46
131
64.9%
20
18
38
52.6%
57
32
89
64.0%
87
59
146
59.6%
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.