H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Pam Shriver vs Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel H2H: 3-1

Pam Shriver holds a 3–1 lead over Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Pam Shriver leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1986 Chicago quarterfinal 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel
Age 59 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 15, 1986* Chicago WTA 250 QF Carpet Pam Shriver #6 6-3 6-4 Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Match data
Oct 15, 1983* Tampa WTA 250 SF Hard Pam Shriver 6-3 6-3 Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Match data
Jun 27, 1982* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Pam Shriver 6-4 6-1 Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Match data
Jan 15, 1982* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R16 Carpet Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel 7-6 6-4 Pam Shriver Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,302 624 277 69.3% 0 0 0 4 20 24
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel — — — 2,082 277 213 56.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Shriver Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1980 4–5 44.4% — 1,505 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1981 27–14 65.9% — 1,806 0 2
15 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,849 0 1 1982 30–19 61.2% — 1,871 0 2
16 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,798 0 1 1983 29–17 63.0% — 1,844 0 2
17 1980 47–21 69.1% — 2,027 0 2 1984 27–19 58.7% — 1,850 0 2
18 1981 58–25 69.9% — 2,122 0 4 1985 41–16 71.9% — 1,975 0 3
19 1982 47–19 71.2% — 2,087 0 5 1986 34–16 68.0% — 1,974 0 4
20 1983 52–15 77.6% — 2,161 0 8 1987 15–8 65.2% — 1,903 0 4
21 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10 1988 5–8 38.5% — 1,812 0 4
22 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,117 0 14 1989 16–15 51.6% — 1,789 0 4
23 1986 47–15 75.8% #5 2,194 0 16 1990 15–18 45.5% — 1,698 0 4
24 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,254 0 20 1991 7–15 31.8% — 1,590 0 4
25 1988 58–14 80.6% #5 2,188 0 24 1992 10–15 40.0% — 1,586 0 4
26 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,955 0 24 1993 12–13 48.0% — 1,629 0 4
27 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,911 0 24 1994 1–5 16.7% — 1,586 0 4
28 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,822 0 24 1995 1–2 33.3% — 1,608 0 4
29 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,858 0 24 1996 3–8 27.3% — 1,555 0 4
30 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24 — — — — — — —
31 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24 — — — — — — —
32 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24 — — — — — — —
33 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24 — — — — — — —
34 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24 — — — — — — —