H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Pam Shriver vs Larisa Savchenko H2H: 6-1

Pam Shriver holds a 6–1 lead over Larisa Savchenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Pam Shriver leads 4–0 on grass and 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1991 Eastbourne Open round of 64 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
6 – 1
7 main-draw meetings
Larisa Savchenko
URS Age 60 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pam Shriver #64 6-2 6-4 Larisa Savchenko #72 Match data Jun 19, 1991* R64 Eastbourne Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Larisa Savchenko #36 6-2 6-3 Pam Shriver #9 Match data Aug 30, 1989* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Pam Shriver #4 6-7 6-2 6-4 Larisa Savchenko #20 Match data Apr 30, 1988* SF Tokyo Pan Pacific WTA 250 Carpet
Pam Shriver #6 4-6 6-2 6-2 Larisa Savchenko #24 Match data Jun 14, 1987* F Birmingham WTA 250 Grass
Pam Shriver #5 6-1 6-1 Larisa Savchenko #26 Match data Oct 3, 1986* R16 New Orleans WTA 250 Carpet
Pam Shriver #6 6-2 6-1 Larisa Savchenko #53 Match data Jun 14, 1986* SF Birmingham WTA 250 Grass
Pam Shriver #4 6-2 6-4 Larisa Savchenko #77 Match data Nov 16, 1985* QF Brisbane International WTA 500 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,304 626 278 69.2% 0 0 0 5 19 24
Larisa Savchenko #305 #13 454 1,926 240 241 49.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Shriver Larisa Savchenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,838 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,813 0 1 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,498 0 0
17 1980 47–21 69.1% #9 2,054 0 2 1984 2–4 33.3% #138 1,506 0 0
18 1981 58–25 69.9% #7 2,137 0 4 1985 15–17 46.9% #55 1,673 0 0
19 1982 47–19 71.2% #6 2,098 0 5 1986 19–16 54.3% #36 1,752 0 0
20 1983 52–15 77.6% #4 2,162 0 8 1987 23–14 62.2% #24 1,793 0 0
21 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10 1988 28–17 62.2% #16 1,869 0 0
22 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,118 0 14 1989 24–16 60.0% #20 1,861 0 0
23 1986 47–15 75.8% #6 2,196 0 16 1990 13–18 41.9% #91 1,706 0 0
24 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,255 0 20 1991 19–16 54.3% #48 1,699 0 1
25 1988 60–15 80.0% #5 2,197 0 24 1992 18–19 48.6% #58 1,720 0 1
26 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,960 0 24 1993 20–17 54.1% #33 1,752 0 2
27 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,915 0 24 1994 19–20 48.7% #41 1,809 0 2
28 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,823 0 24 1995 11–20 35.5% #99 1,650 0 2
29 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,857 0 24 1996 11–14 44.0% #61 1,668 0 2
30 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24 1997 8–14 36.4% #87 1,620 0 2
31 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24 1998 8–10 44.4% #73 1,652 0 2
32 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24 1999 2–8 20.0% #210 1,585 0 2
33 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24 — — — — — — —
34 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pam Shriver Larisa Savchenko
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1978 6 1 7 85.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 1983 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1980 22 7 29 75.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 9 7 16 56.3% 1984 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
18 1981 15 5 20 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 19 3 22 86.4% 18 15 33 54.5% 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 1 4 75.0%
19 1982 11 4 15 73.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 18 9 27 66.7% 1986 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 3 6 9 33.3%
20 1983 17 3 20 85.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 13 3 16 81.3% 20 8 28 71.4% 1987 9 5 14 64.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
21 1984 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 15 4 19 78.9% 19 6 25 76.0% 1988 17 10 27 63.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
22 1985 14 3 17 82.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 19 4 23 82.6% 19 4 23 82.6% 1989 10 6 16 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
23 1986 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 10 1 11 90.9% 23 9 32 71.9% 1990 3 9 12 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0%
24 1987 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — 30 5 35 85.7% 17 5 22 77.3% 1991 11 10 21 52.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 1 6 83.3%
25 1988 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 24 4 28 85.7% 16 3 19 84.2% 1992 9 8 17 52.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 4 6 33.3%
26 1989 12 7 19 63.2% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1993 8 6 14 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 5 11 54.5%
27 1990 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 1994 6 8 14 42.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0%
28 1991 11 11 22 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1995 3 8 11 27.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
29 1992 11 9 20 55.0% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
30 1993 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1997 3 5 8 37.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 1994 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 1998 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 1995 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 1999 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 1996 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1997 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 196 100 296 66.2% 18 12 30 60.0% 205 61 266 77.1% 204 104 308 66.2% — 97 102 199 48.7% 27 47 74 36.5% 70 46 116 60.3% 46 46 92 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pam Shriver Larisa Savchenko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1978 1839 153.8 — — — — +104 — -258 69.2% +1.66 4–3 (57%) 7–3 (70%) 108.7 +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1979 1813 147.5 — — — — +7 — -37 57.1% +0.36 0–8 (0%) 4–2 (67%) 93.1 -0.83 1983 1498 109.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.18
17 1980 2055 163.4 — — — — -49 -406 -67 68.7% +1.41 11–9 (55%) 8–7 (53%) 104.9 -7.03 1984 1507 116.6 — — — — — +100 +55 40.0% -0.87 1–2 (33%) — — +0.25
18 1981 2138 166.4 — — — — -89 -332 -9 71.3% +1.67 4–10 (29%) 10–6 (63%) 96.8 -6.74 1985 1674 126.0 — — — — -46 -159 -3 44.2% -0.31 9–6 (60%) 3–5 (38%) 104.0 -0.37
19 1982 2099 161.9 — — — — -1 -284 +23 69.7% +1.63 7–7 (50%) 7–5 (58%) 102.0 -2.82 1986 1752 135.5 — — — — -106 -188 +58 51.2% -0.16 8–4 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 103.9 -1.29
20 1983 2163 167.8 — — — — +33 -321 +16 73.1% +1.83 11–6 (65%) 7–5 (58%) 101.0 -4.79 1987 1793 136.6 — — — — -74 -246 +115 60.8% +0.61 5–2 (71%) 2–5 (29%) 102.1 +1.13
21 1984 2061 163.5 — — — — +77 — +84 75.8% +1.98 4–8 (33%) 7–2 (78%) 94.6 -0.74 1988 1870 156.5 — — — — -44 — +85 56.9% +0.37 13–8 (62%) 11–6 (65%) 107.7 -2.81
22 1985 2119 161.1 — — — — +48 -302 +85 75.7% +1.82 10–4 (71%) 13–7 (65%) 101.9 +0.23 1989 1862 145.0 — — — — +27 -238 +26 60.2% +0.39 5–10 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 94.3 -0.82
23 1986 2196 175.2 — — — — +23 — +26 75.9% +2.04 2–7 (22%) 7–4 (64%) 95.5 -4.63 1990 1707 132.7 — — — — -4 -54 +235 43.7% -0.39 8–5 (62%) 2–5 (29%) 97.9 -0.20
24 1987 2256 167.4 — — — — -1 — +39 78.5% +2.08 8–4 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 -3.44 1991 1699 122.6 — — — — +18 -58 +204 53.7% +0.02 6–6 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 99.3 +1.48
25 1988 2197 167.5 — — — — +37 — +105 76.5% +1.85 11–5 (69%) 8–6 (57%) 98.7 -3.71 1992 1721 141.5 — — — — +9 -77 +179 49.4% -0.16 4–5 (44%) 5–6 (45%) 96.8 -1.79
26 1989 1961 141.0 — — — — +38 — +226 60.0% +0.72 8–6 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 92.2 +0.34 1993 1753 140.6 — — — — +6 -113 +158 52.3% -0.05 7–5 (58%) 3–6 (33%) 98.9 -0.11
27 1990 1915 136.1 — — — — +25 — — 58.6% +0.83 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.41 1994 1809 144.2 — — — — -28 -170 +83 48.4% -0.13 7–6 (54%) 6–4 (60%) 102.0 -3.68
28 1991 1823 146.6 — — — — -5 — +351 56.0% +0.62 1–5 (17%) 2–8 (20%) 88.5 -2.30 1995 1650 126.3 — — — — +4 -8 +193 39.1% -0.65 6–5 (55%) 2–3 (40%) 99.9 +0.43
29 1992 1857 156.5 — — — — +5 — +328 56.4% +0.71 5–3 (63%) 4–5 (44%) 101.5 -2.50 1996 1668 126.6 — — — — -51 -53 +258 44.1% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 0–2 — -1.58
30 1993 1820 148.3 — — — — +6 — +300 52.5% +0.05 4–7 (36%) 3–2 (60%) 95.2 -1.73 1997 1621 121.0 — — — — +6 -24 +203 38.0% -0.46 5–3 (63%) 0–6 (0%) 97.6 +0.42
31 1994 1700 125.8 — — — — +6 — +296 48.5% -0.04 5–7 (42%) 3–3 (50%) 95.7 +0.51 1998 1653 111.5 — — — — -22 -84 +168 48.8% -0.10 5–4 (56%) 2–1 (67%) 102.7 +0.09
32 1995 1649 116.2 — — — — -2 — +277 38.1% -0.64 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 +0.26 1999 1586 92.7 — — — — -28 -65 +209 28.0% -2.28 2–3 (40%) — — +0.24
33 1996 1611 115.9 — — — — -22 — +337 39.3% -0.79 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1997 1636 111.8 — — — — -20 — — 57.1% +0.86 1–0 0–2 — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2304 166.5 — — — — +10 -331 +78 67.8% +1.37 103–105 (50%) 102–76 (57%) 97.2 -4.47 — 1927 142.7 — — — — -21 -97 +127 49.6% -0.13 96–79 (55%) 46–56 (45%) 98.2 -1.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.