H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Pam Shriver vs Larisa Savchenko H2H: 6-1

Pam Shriver holds a 6–1 lead over Larisa Savchenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Pam Shriver leads 4–0 on grass and 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1991 Eastbourne second round 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
6 – 1
7 main draw meetings
Larisa Savchenko
URS 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 19, 1991* Eastbourne WTA 250 R64 Grass Pam Shriver #64 6-2 6-4 Larisa Savchenko #72 Match data
Aug 30, 1989* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Larisa Savchenko #36 6-2 6-3 Pam Shriver #9 Match data
Apr 30, 1988* Tokyo Pan Pacific WTA 250 SF Carpet Pam Shriver #4 6-7 6-2 6-4 Larisa Savchenko #20 Match data
Jun 14, 1987* Birmingham WTA 250 F Grass Pam Shriver #6 4-6 6-2 6-2 Larisa Savchenko #24 Match data
Oct 3, 1986* New Orleans WTA 250 R16 Carpet Pam Shriver #5 6-1 6-1 Larisa Savchenko #26 Match data
Jun 14, 1986* Birmingham WTA 250 SF Grass Pam Shriver #6 6-2 6-1 Larisa Savchenko #53 Match data
Nov 16, 1985* Brisbane WTA 500 QF Grass Pam Shriver #4 6-2 6-4 Larisa Savchenko #77 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,302 624 277 69.3% 0 0 0 4 20 24
Larisa Savchenko #305 #13 454 1,926 238 239 49.9% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Pam Shriver Larisa Savchenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,849 0 1 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,497 0 0
1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,798 0 1 1984 2–4 33.3% #138 1,507 0 0
1980 47–21 69.1% — 2,027 0 2 1985 15–17 46.9% #55 1,683 0 0
1981 58–25 69.9% — 2,122 0 4 1986 19–16 54.3% #36 1,755 0 0
1982 47–19 71.2% — 2,087 0 5 1987 23–14 62.2% #24 1,792 0 0
1983 52–15 77.6% — 2,161 0 8 1988 26–16 61.9% #16 1,861 0 0
1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10 1989 24–16 60.0% #20 1,887 0 0
1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,117 0 14 1990 13–18 41.9% #91 1,715 0 0
1986 47–15 75.8% #5 2,194 0 16 1991 19–16 54.3% #48 1,702 0 1
1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,254 0 20 1992 18–18 50.0% #58 1,728 0 1
1988 58–14 80.6% #5 2,188 0 24 1993 20–17 54.1% #33 1,755 0 2
1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,955 0 24 1994 19–20 48.7% #41 1,809 0 2
1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,911 0 24 1995 11–20 35.5% #99 1,651 0 2
1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,822 0 24 1996 11–14 44.0% #61 1,669 0 2
1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,858 0 24 1997 8–14 36.4% #87 1,622 0 2
1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24 1998 8–10 44.4% #73 1,654 0 2
1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24 1999 2–8 20.0% #210 1,586 0 2
1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24 — — — — — — —
1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24 — — — — — — —
1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24 — — — — — — —