H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Pam Shriver vs Laura Garrone H2H: 1-0

Pam Shriver holds a 1–0 lead over Laura Garrone in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pam Shriver leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1988 Brighton round of 16 6-0 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Laura Garrone
ITA Age 58 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pam Shriver #5 6-0 6-0 Laura Garrone #60 Match data Oct 29, 1988* R16 Brighton WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,304 626 278 69.2% 0 0 0 5 19 24
Laura Garrone #262 #32 90 1,726 109 130 45.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Shriver Laura Garrone
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,838 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,813 0 1 1984 0–1 0.0% #234 1,491 0 0
17 1980 47–21 69.1% #9 2,054 0 2 1985 5–5 50.0% #203 1,530 0 0
18 1981 58–25 69.9% #7 2,137 0 4 1986 22–14 61.1% #38 1,678 0 0
19 1982 47–19 71.2% #6 2,098 0 5 1987 15–17 46.9% #86 1,611 0 0
20 1983 52–15 77.6% #4 2,162 0 8 1988 17–17 50.0% #64 1,637 0 0
21 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10 1989 14–17 45.2% #87 1,607 0 0
22 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,118 0 14 1990 14–15 48.3% #65 1,609 0 0
23 1986 47–15 75.8% #6 2,196 0 16 1991 10–14 41.7% #93 1,622 0 0
24 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,255 0 20 1992 5–12 29.4% #156 1,559 0 0
25 1988 60–15 80.0% #5 2,197 0 24 1993 0–3 0.0% #169 1,521 0 0
26 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,960 0 24 1994 2–5 28.6% #167 1,519 0 0
27 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,915 0 24 1995 2–5 28.6% #194 1,492 0 0
28 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,823 0 24 1996 1–3 25.0% #258 1,467 0 0
29 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,857 0 24 1997 2–2 50.0% #224 1,501 0 0
30 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24 — — — — — — —
31 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24 — — — — — — —
32 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24 — — — — — — —
33 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24 — — — — — — —
34 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pam Shriver Laura Garrone
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1978 6 1 7 85.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1980 22 7 29 75.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 9 7 16 56.3% 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1981 15 5 20 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 19 3 22 86.4% 18 15 33 54.5% 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 20 9 29 69.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1982 11 4 15 73.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 18 9 27 66.7% 1987 3 7 10 30.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
20 1983 17 3 20 85.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 13 3 16 81.3% 20 8 28 71.4% 1988 2 4 6 33.3% 14 11 25 56.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1984 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 15 4 19 78.9% 19 6 25 76.0% 1989 2 4 6 33.3% 12 12 24 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1985 14 3 17 82.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 19 4 23 82.6% 19 4 23 82.6% 1990 2 2 4 50.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1986 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 10 1 11 90.9% 23 9 32 71.9% 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 7 10 17 41.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1987 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — 30 5 35 85.7% 17 5 22 77.3% 1992 — — — — 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 1988 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 24 4 28 85.7% 16 3 19 84.2% 1993 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 1989 12 7 19 63.2% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1994 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — —
27 1990 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 1995 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1991 11 11 22 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1996 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
29 1992 11 9 20 55.0% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 1997 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
30 1993 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1994 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1995 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1996 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1997 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 196 100 296 66.2% 18 12 30 60.0% 205 61 266 77.1% 204 104 308 66.2% — 12 22 34 35.3% 88 90 178 49.4% 5 7 12 41.7% 4 11 15 26.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pam Shriver Laura Garrone
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1978 1839 153.8 — — — — +104 — -258 69.2% +1.66 4–3 (57%) 7–3 (70%) 108.7 +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1979 1813 147.5 — — — — +7 — -37 57.1% +0.36 0–8 (0%) 4–2 (67%) 93.1 -0.83 1984 1491 101.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.04
17 1980 2055 163.4 — — — — -49 -406 -67 68.7% +1.41 11–9 (55%) 8–7 (53%) 104.9 -7.03 1985 1530 112.1 — — — — +27 +58 — 50.0% +0.09 1–1 — — +1.29
18 1981 2138 166.4 — — — — -89 -332 -9 71.3% +1.67 4–10 (29%) 10–6 (63%) 96.8 -6.74 1986 1679 134.8 — — — — -125 +127 — 60.2% +0.82 5–6 (45%) 3–4 (43%) 98.8 +2.90
19 1982 2099 161.9 — — — — -1 -284 +23 69.7% +1.63 7–7 (50%) 7–5 (58%) 102.0 -2.82 1987 1612 116.6 — — — — -75 +112 -43 46.7% -0.13 6–7 (46%) 0–3 (0%) 95.4 +4.27
20 1983 2163 167.8 — — — — +33 -321 +16 73.1% +1.83 11–6 (65%) 7–5 (58%) 101.0 -4.79 1988 1638 122.2 — — — — -120 +69 — 49.4% -0.04 9–6 (60%) 3–2 (60%) 103.6 +1.56
21 1984 2061 163.5 — — — — +77 — +84 75.8% +1.98 4–8 (33%) 7–2 (78%) 94.6 -0.74 1989 1608 123.3 — — — — -78 +56 — 44.1% -0.31 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.9 +2.18
22 1985 2119 161.1 — — — — +48 -302 +85 75.7% +1.82 10–4 (71%) 13–7 (65%) 101.9 +0.23 1990 1609 114.2 — — — — -61 +31 — 47.8% +0.03 5–6 (45%) 1–3 (25%) 97.1 +1.49
23 1986 2196 175.2 — — — — +23 — +26 75.9% +2.04 2–7 (22%) 7–4 (64%) 95.5 -4.63 1991 1623 119.5 — — — — -83 -31 +17 42.6% -0.87 3–5 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 100.5 -0.55
24 1987 2256 167.4 — — — — -1 — +39 78.5% +2.08 8–4 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 -3.44 1992 1559 114.1 — — — — -34 +20 — 32.4% -1.19 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 101.6 -0.10
25 1988 2197 167.5 — — — — +37 — +105 76.5% +1.85 11–5 (69%) 8–6 (57%) 98.7 -3.71 1993 1522 103.3 — — — — — +11 — 25.0% -1.37 0–2 — — -0.08
26 1989 1961 141.0 — — — — +38 — +226 60.0% +0.72 8–6 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 92.2 +0.34 1994 1520 113.3 — — — — — +23 — 37.5% -0.75 0–2 0–1 — -0.17
27 1990 1915 136.1 — — — — +25 — — 58.6% +0.83 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.41 1995 1492 97.8 — — — — — +14 — 31.3% -1.50 1–1 — — +0.33
28 1991 1823 146.6 — — — — -5 — +351 56.0% +0.62 1–5 (17%) 2–8 (20%) 88.5 -2.30 1996 1468 98.9 — — — — — +5 — 33.3% -0.56 0–1 0–1 — +0.48
29 1992 1857 156.5 — — — — +5 — +328 56.4% +0.71 5–3 (63%) 4–5 (44%) 101.5 -2.50 1997 1501 112.4 — — — — — +13 — 50.0% +0.50 1–1 0–1 — -0.18
30 1993 1820 148.3 — — — — +6 — +300 52.5% +0.05 4–7 (36%) 3–2 (60%) 95.2 -1.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1994 1700 125.8 — — — — +6 — +296 48.5% -0.04 5–7 (42%) 3–3 (50%) 95.7 +0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1995 1649 116.2 — — — — -2 — +277 38.1% -0.64 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1996 1611 115.9 — — — — -22 — +337 39.3% -0.79 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1997 1636 111.8 — — — — -20 — — 57.1% +0.86 1–0 0–2 — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2304 166.5 — — — — +10 -331 +78 67.8% +1.37 103–105 (50%) 102–76 (57%) 97.2 -4.47 — 1726 125.1 — — — — -79 +56 -17 46.4% -0.19 36–45 (44%) 18–21 (46%) 97.2 +5.60

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.