H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Pam Shriver vs Lea Antonoplis H2H: 3-1

Pam Shriver holds a 3–1 lead over Lea Antonoplis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Pam Shriver leads 2–1 on grass and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1985 Newport quarterfinal 6-0 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Lea Antonoplis
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 20, 1985* Newport WTA 250 QF Grass Pam Shriver #5 6-0 6-2 Lea Antonoplis #66 Match data
Nov 18, 1982* Brisbane WTA 500 R32 Grass Pam Shriver 6-4 6-3 Lea Antonoplis Match data
Jan 14, 1982* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R32 Carpet Pam Shriver 6-1 6-0 Lea Antonoplis Match data
Jun 22, 1978* Eastbourne WTA 250 R32 Grass Lea Antonoplis 6-2 6-2 Pam Shriver Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,302 624 277 69.3% 0 0 0 4 20 24
Lea Antonoplis #599 #66 6 1,774 126 176 41.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Shriver Lea Antonoplis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1973 8–3 72.7% — 1,579 0 0
15 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,849 0 1 1974 2–5 28.6% — 1,532 0 0
16 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,798 0 1 1975 3–4 42.9% — 1,559 0 0
17 1980 47–21 69.1% — 2,027 0 2 1976 7–6 53.8% — 1,626 0 0
18 1981 58–25 69.9% — 2,122 0 4 1977 6–4 60.0% — 1,665 0 0
19 1982 47–19 71.2% — 2,087 0 5 1978 17–20 45.9% — 1,717 0 0
20 1983 52–15 77.6% — 2,161 0 8 1979 11–13 45.8% — 1,724 0 1
21 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10 1980 14–7 66.7% — 1,735 0 2
22 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,117 0 14 1981 9–11 45.0% — 1,719 0 2
23 1986 47–15 75.8% #5 2,194 0 16 1982 8–18 30.8% — 1,632 0 2
24 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,254 0 20 1983 6–13 31.6% — 1,568 0 2
25 1988 58–14 80.6% #5 2,188 0 24 1984 8–11 42.1% #71 1,583 0 2
26 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,955 0 24 1985 14–21 40.0% #66 1,572 0 2
27 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,911 0 24 1986 2–14 12.5% #176 1,460 0 2
28 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,822 0 24 1987 3–9 25.0% #163 1,413 0 2
29 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,858 0 24 1988 5–9 35.7% #142 1,455 0 2
30 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24 1989 3–7 30.0% #210 1,448 0 2
31 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24 1990 0–1 0.0% #599 1,432 0 2
32 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24 — — — — — — —
33 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24 — — — — — — —
34 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24 — — — — — — —