H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Pam Shriver vs Lisa Bonder Kreiss H2H: 4-0
Pam Shriver holds a 4–0 lead over Lisa Bonder Kreiss in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Pam Shriver leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1987 Dallas fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 1987* | Dallas | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Pam Shriver | 6-3 6-3 | Lisa Bonder Kreiss | Match data |
| Aug 15, 1986* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Pam Shriver | 6-3 6-3 | Lisa Bonder Kreiss | Match data |
| Sep 7, 1983* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Pam Shriver | 6-2 6-2 | Lisa Bonder Kreiss | Match data |
| Apr 8, 1982* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Pam Shriver | 6-4 6-2 | Lisa Bonder Kreiss | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pam Shriver | #234 | #3 | 163 | 2,302 | 624 | 277 | 69.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 20 | 24 |
| Lisa Bonder Kreiss | — | — | — | 1,928 | 148 | 131 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Pam Shriver | Lisa Bonder Kreiss | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1978 | 23–8 | 74.2% | — | 1,849 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 9–6 | 60.0% | — | 1,603 | 0 | 1 |
| 1979 | 16–16 | 50.0% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 28–15 | 65.1% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 3 |
| 1980 | 47–21 | 69.1% | — | 2,027 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,885 | 0 | 5 |
| 1981 | 58–25 | 69.9% | — | 2,122 | 0 | 4 | 1984 | 31–19 | 62.0% | — | 1,865 | 0 | 5 |
| 1982 | 47–19 | 71.2% | — | 2,087 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 17–22 | 43.6% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 5 |
| 1983 | 52–15 | 77.6% | — | 2,161 | 0 | 8 | 1986 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 5 |
| 1984 | 44–13 | 77.2% | #4 | 2,060 | 0 | 10 | 1987 | 12–14 | 46.2% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 5 |
| 1985 | 54–13 | 80.6% | #4 | 2,117 | 0 | 14 | 1988 | 6–14 | 30.0% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 5 |
| 1986 | 47–15 | 75.8% | #5 | 2,194 | 0 | 16 | 1989 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 5 |
| 1987 | 60–13 | 82.2% | #4 | 2,254 | 0 | 20 | 1990 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 5 |
| 1988 | 58–14 | 80.6% | #5 | 2,188 | 0 | 24 | 1991 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 5 |
| 1989 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #18 | 1,955 | 0 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #66 | 1,911 | 0 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #37 | 1,822 | 0 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #30 | 1,858 | 0 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #38 | 1,819 | 0 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #63 | 1,699 | 0 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #110 | 1,649 | 0 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #189 | 1,611 | 0 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #234 | 1,635 | 0 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |