H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Pam Shriver vs Liz Smylie H2H: 3-0

Pam Shriver holds a 3–0 lead over Liz Smylie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Pam Shriver leads 3–0 on grass. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1988 Birmingham third round 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Liz Smylie
AUS Age 63 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 9, 1988* Birmingham WTA 250 R32 Grass Pam Shriver #3 7-5 6-3 Liz Smylie #68 Match data
Jun 19, 1987* Eastbourne WTA 250 R16 Grass Pam Shriver #6 6-4 6-1 Liz Smylie #25 Match data
Jun 7, 1982* Beckenham WTA 250 F Grass Pam Shriver 6-3 6-2 Liz Smylie Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,302 624 277 69.3% 0 0 0 4 20 24
Liz Smylie #501 #20 29 1,824 161 188 46.1% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Shriver Liz Smylie
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,849 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,798 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1980 47–21 69.1% — 2,027 0 2 1980 11–4 73.3% — 1,641 0 1
18 1981 58–25 69.9% — 2,122 0 4 1981 2–10 16.7% — 1,528 0 1
19 1982 47–19 71.2% — 2,087 0 5 1982 15–8 65.2% — 1,634 0 3
20 1983 52–15 77.6% — 2,161 0 8 1983 20–14 58.8% — 1,758 0 4
21 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10 1984 13–18 41.9% #36 1,766 0 4
22 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,117 0 14 1985 16–19 45.7% #43 1,730 0 4
23 1986 47–15 75.8% #5 2,194 0 16 1986 6–13 31.6% #114 1,669 0 4
24 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,254 0 20 1987 20–14 58.8% #27 1,747 0 5
25 1988 58–14 80.6% #5 2,188 0 24 1988 4–11 26.7% #153 1,597 0 5
26 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,955 0 24 1989 21–22 48.8% #66 1,679 0 5
27 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,911 0 24 1990 15–16 48.4% #53 1,664 0 5
28 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,822 0 24 1991 9–16 36.0% #116 1,612 0 5
29 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,858 0 24 1992 0–1 0.0% #209 1,599 0 5
30 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24 1993 7–15 31.8% #125 1,550 0 5
31 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24 1994 2–7 22.2% #192 1,515 0 5
32 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24 — — — — — — —
33 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24 — — — — — — —
34 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24 — — — — — — —