H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Pam Shriver vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 7-0

Pam Shriver holds a 7–0 lead over Lori Mcneil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Pam Shriver leads 3–0 on carpet and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1993 Zurich third round 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
7 – 0
7 main draw meetings
Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 7, 1993* Zurich WTA 1000 R32 Carpet Pam Shriver #33 7-5 6-4 Lori Mcneil #24 Match data
Jan 15, 1993* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Hard Pam Shriver #27 6-1 7-6 Lori Mcneil #14 Match data
Mar 28, 1992* San Antonio WTA 250 QF Hard Pam Shriver #36 6-7 6-2 7-6 Lori Mcneil #21 Match data
Feb 1, 1992* Tokyo Pan Pacific WTA 250 R16 Carpet Pam Shriver #41 6-4 6-1 Lori Mcneil #21 Match data
Jun 11, 1988* Birmingham WTA 250 SF Grass Pam Shriver #3 6-1 4-6 6-3 Lori Mcneil #10 Match data
Mar 21, 1987* Dallas WTA 250 SF Carpet Pam Shriver #5 7-5 6-3 Lori Mcneil #13 Match data
Jul 20, 1986* Newport WTA 250 F Grass Pam Shriver #6 6-4 6-2 Lori Mcneil #57 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,302 624 277 69.3% 0 0 0 4 20 24
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,032 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Shriver Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,849 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,798 0 1 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 1980 47–21 69.1% — 2,027 0 2 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1
18 1981 58–25 69.9% — 2,122 0 4 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1
19 1982 47–19 71.2% — 2,087 0 5 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,569 0 1
20 1983 52–15 77.6% — 2,161 0 8 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,609 0 1
21 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
22 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,117 0 14 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
23 1986 47–15 75.8% #5 2,194 0 16 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,017 0 3
24 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,254 0 20 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,904 0 5
25 1988 58–14 80.6% #5 2,188 0 24 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
26 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,955 0 24 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,696 0 6
27 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,911 0 24 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
28 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,822 0 24 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
29 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,858 0 24 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,726 0 11
33 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,655 0 11
34 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,717 0 11
35 — — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,669 0 11