H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC

Pam Shriver vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 7-0

Pam Shriver holds a 7–0 lead over Lori Mcneil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Pam Shriver leads 3–0 on carpet and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1993 Zurich round of 32 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
7 – 0
7 main-draw meetings
Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pam Shriver #33 7-5 6-4 Lori Mcneil #24 Match data Oct 7, 1993* R32 Zurich Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet
Pam Shriver #27 6-1 7-6 Lori Mcneil #14 Match data Jan 15, 1993* R16 Sydney International Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Pam Shriver #36 6-7 6-2 7-6 Lori Mcneil #21 Match data Mar 28, 1992* QF San Antonio Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Pam Shriver #41 6-4 6-1 Lori Mcneil #21 Match data Feb 1, 1992* R16 Tokyo Pan Pacific Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Pam Shriver #3 6-1 4-6 6-3 Lori Mcneil #10 Match data Jun 11, 1988* SF Birmingham WTA 250 Grass
Pam Shriver #5 7-5 6-3 Lori Mcneil #13 Match data Mar 21, 1987* SF Dallas WTA 250 Carpet
Pam Shriver #6 6-4 6-2 Lori Mcneil #57 Match data Jul 20, 1986* F Newport WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,304 626 278 69.2% 0 0 0 5 19 24
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,024 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 1 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Shriver Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,838 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,813 0 1 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 1980 47–21 69.1% #9 2,054 0 2 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1
18 1981 58–25 69.9% #7 2,137 0 4 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1
19 1982 47–19 71.2% #6 2,098 0 5 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,568 0 1
20 1983 52–15 77.6% #4 2,162 0 8 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,608 0 1
21 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
22 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,118 0 14 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
23 1986 47–15 75.8% #6 2,196 0 16 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,007 0 3
24 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,255 0 20 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,901 0 5
25 1988 60–15 80.0% #5 2,197 0 24 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
26 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,960 0 24 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,695 0 6
27 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,915 0 24 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
28 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,823 0 24 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
29 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,857 0 24 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,727 0 11
33 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,656 0 11
34 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,718 0 11
35 — — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,670 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pam Shriver Lori Mcneil
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1978 6 1 7 85.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1980 22 7 29 75.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 9 7 16 56.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1981 15 5 20 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 19 3 22 86.4% 18 15 33 54.5% 1982 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1982 11 4 15 73.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 18 9 27 66.7% 1983 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1983 17 3 20 85.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 13 3 16 81.3% 20 8 28 71.4% 1984 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1984 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 15 4 19 78.9% 19 6 25 76.0% 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9%
22 1985 14 3 17 82.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 19 4 23 82.6% 19 4 23 82.6% 1986 20 7 27 74.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 6 14 57.1%
23 1986 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 10 1 11 90.9% 23 9 32 71.9% 1987 19 6 25 76.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 6 15 60.0% 19 8 27 70.4%
24 1987 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — 30 5 35 85.7% 17 5 22 77.3% 1988 22 10 32 68.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
25 1988 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 24 4 28 85.7% 16 3 19 84.2% 1989 10 8 18 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
26 1989 12 7 19 63.2% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1990 8 11 19 42.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 1990 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 1991 24 10 34 70.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1%
28 1991 11 11 22 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1992 13 9 22 59.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 11 6 17 64.7%
29 1992 11 9 20 55.0% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 1993 11 8 19 57.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 10 2 12 83.3% 4 4 8 50.0%
30 1993 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1994 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 2 13 84.6% 5 4 9 55.6%
31 1994 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 1995 4 7 11 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
32 1995 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0%
33 1996 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1997 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
34 1997 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 196 100 296 66.2% 18 12 30 60.0% 205 61 266 77.1% 204 104 308 66.2% — 160 110 270 59.3% 39 52 91 42.9% 99 49 148 66.9% 77 60 137 56.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pam Shriver Lori Mcneil
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1978 1839 153.8 — — — — +104 — -258 69.2% +1.66 4–3 (57%) 7–3 (70%) 108.7 +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1979 1813 147.5 — — — — +7 — -37 57.1% +0.36 0–8 (0%) 4–2 (67%) 93.1 -0.83 1980 1485 95.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17
17 1980 2055 163.4 — — — — -49 -406 -67 68.7% +1.41 11–9 (55%) 8–7 (53%) 104.9 -7.03 1981 1521 104.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +4.50 — — — +0.24
18 1981 2138 166.4 — — — — -89 -332 -9 71.3% +1.67 4–10 (29%) 10–6 (63%) 96.8 -6.74 1982 1503 100.0 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–1 — +0.35
19 1982 2099 161.9 — — — — -1 -284 +23 69.7% +1.63 7–7 (50%) 7–5 (58%) 102.0 -2.82 1983 1569 107.1 — — — — +44 — — 53.8% +0.19 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +1.06
20 1983 2163 167.8 — — — — +33 -321 +16 73.1% +1.83 11–6 (65%) 7–5 (58%) 101.0 -4.79 1984 1608 115.2 — — — — +12 -54 +10 38.1% -0.81 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +0.27
21 1984 2061 163.5 — — — — +77 — +84 75.8% +1.98 4–8 (33%) 7–2 (78%) 94.6 -0.74 1985 1587 118.3 — — — — +22 -103 +5 39.2% -0.85 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.4 -0.20
22 1985 2119 161.1 — — — — +48 -302 +85 75.7% +1.82 10–4 (71%) 13–7 (65%) 101.9 +0.23 1986 1884 144.9 — — — — -9 -341 -107 60.5% +0.68 16–10 (62%) 12–9 (57%) 109.2 +1.49
23 1986 2196 175.2 — — — — +23 — +26 75.9% +2.04 2–7 (22%) 7–4 (64%) 95.5 -4.63 1987 2007 158.4 — — — — +54 -355 -205 63.8% +0.91 16–9 (64%) 12–1 (92%) 109.8 -0.78
24 1987 2256 167.4 — — — — -1 — +39 78.5% +2.08 8–4 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 -3.44 1988 1901 142.6 — — — — +37 -185 +39 62.9% +0.76 19–10 (66%) 8–5 (62%) 105.0 +2.06
25 1988 2197 167.5 — — — — +37 — +105 76.5% +1.85 11–5 (69%) 8–6 (57%) 98.7 -3.71 1989 1760 134.7 — — — — +60 -78 +79 52.0% +0.07 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) 96.3 -0.23
26 1989 1961 141.0 — — — — +38 — +226 60.0% +0.72 8–6 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 92.2 +0.34 1990 1695 134.9 — — — — +14 -74 +200 48.2% -0.08 4–9 (31%) 5–6 (45%) 90.4 -0.80
27 1990 1915 136.1 — — — — +25 — — 58.6% +0.83 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.41 1991 1870 151.0 — — — — +12 -241 +42 60.4% +0.77 13–6 (68%) 9–10 (47%) 104.2 -0.74
28 1991 1823 146.6 — — — — -5 — +351 56.0% +0.62 1–5 (17%) 2–8 (20%) 88.5 -2.30 1992 1962 156.8 — — — — -4 -303 +76 63.6% +0.94 8–10 (44%) 10–9 (53%) 96.7 -0.46
29 1992 1857 156.5 — — — — +5 — +328 56.4% +0.71 5–3 (63%) 4–5 (44%) 101.5 -2.50 1993 1899 147.7 — — — — -6 -291 +192 58.1% +0.61 6–7 (46%) 3–9 (25%) 95.3 -0.38
30 1993 1820 148.3 — — — — +6 — +300 52.5% +0.05 4–7 (36%) 3–2 (60%) 95.2 -1.73 1994 1871 145.9 — — — — -58 -207 +244 61.1% +0.69 7–8 (47%) 7–5 (58%) 98.9 -0.52
31 1994 1700 125.8 — — — — +6 — +296 48.5% -0.04 5–7 (42%) 3–3 (50%) 95.7 +0.51 1995 1805 142.2 — — — — -13 -206 +304 53.8% +0.38 5–12 (29%) 4–8 (33%) 91.4 -0.26
32 1995 1649 116.2 — — — — -2 — +277 38.1% -0.64 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 +0.26 1996 1727 130.2 — — — — -12 — +384 36.5% -0.65 5–3 (63%) 2–7 (22%) 96.5 -0.48
33 1996 1611 115.9 — — — — -22 — +337 39.3% -0.79 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.33 1997 1656 120.2 — — — — +31 — — 22.2% -1.61 0–2 0–1 — -1.12
34 1997 1636 111.8 — — — — -20 — — 57.1% +0.86 1–0 0–2 — -0.20 1998 1719 129.4 — — — — +1 -154 +315 51.4% +0.09 5–2 (71%) 0–2 — -0.58
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1671 99.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–1 — +0.18
Career — 2304 166.5 — — — — +10 -331 +78 67.8% +1.37 103–105 (50%) 102–76 (57%) 97.2 -4.47 — 2025 149.2 — — — — +14 -212 +86 56.0% +0.41 117–106 (52%) 81–87 (48%) 98.3 -0.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.