H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Pam Shriver vs Louise Field H2H: 1-0

Pam Shriver holds a 1–0 lead over Louise Field in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pam Shriver leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1989 Moscow round of 32 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Louise Field
AUS Age 59 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pam Shriver #11 6-2 6-2 Louise Field #98 Match data Oct 12, 1989* R32 Moscow WTA 500 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,304 626 278 69.2% 0 0 0 5 19 24
Louise Field #752 #96 12 1,550 58 121 32.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Shriver Louise Field
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,838 0 1 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,487 0 0
16 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,813 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1980 47–21 69.1% #9 2,054 0 2 1984 0–1 0.0% #248 1,485 0 0
18 1981 58–25 69.9% #7 2,137 0 4 1985 4–6 40.0% #106 1,517 0 0
19 1982 47–19 71.2% #6 2,098 0 5 1986 4–10 28.6% #157 1,479 0 0
20 1983 52–15 77.6% #4 2,162 0 8 1987 11–17 39.3% #113 1,453 0 0
21 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10 1988 4–13 23.5% #163 1,412 0 0
22 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,118 0 14 1989 12–20 37.5% #100 1,542 0 0
23 1986 47–15 75.8% #6 2,196 0 16 1990 9–17 34.6% #125 1,522 0 0
24 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,255 0 20 1991 3–14 17.6% #193 1,435 0 0
25 1988 60–15 80.0% #5 2,197 0 24 1992 5–9 35.7% #170 1,449 0 0
26 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,960 0 24 1993 5–10 33.3% #175 1,470 0 0
27 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,915 0 24 1994 1–3 25.0% #197 1,477 0 0
28 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,823 0 24 — — — — — — —
29 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,857 0 24 — — — — — — —
30 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24 — — — — — — —
31 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24 — — — — — — —
32 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24 — — — — — — —
33 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24 — — — — — — —
34 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pam Shriver Louise Field
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1978 6 1 7 85.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1980 22 7 29 75.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 9 7 16 56.3% 1984 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 1981 15 5 20 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 19 3 22 86.4% 18 15 33 54.5% 1985 — — — — — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
19 1982 11 4 15 73.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 18 9 27 66.7% 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1983 17 3 20 85.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 13 3 16 81.3% 20 8 28 71.4% 1987 3 6 9 33.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1984 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 15 4 19 78.9% 19 6 25 76.0% 1988 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
22 1985 14 3 17 82.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 19 4 23 82.6% 19 4 23 82.6% 1989 8 13 21 38.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1986 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 10 1 11 90.9% 23 9 32 71.9% 1990 5 8 13 38.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1987 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — 30 5 35 85.7% 17 5 22 77.3% 1991 3 10 13 23.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 1988 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 24 4 28 85.7% 16 3 19 84.2% 1992 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 1989 12 7 19 63.2% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1993 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1990 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1991 11 11 22 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1992 11 9 20 55.0% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1993 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1994 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1995 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1996 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1997 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 196 100 296 66.2% 18 12 30 60.0% 205 61 266 77.1% 204 104 308 66.2% — 31 61 92 33.7% 7 26 33 21.2% 17 24 41 41.5% 3 7 10 30.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pam Shriver Louise Field
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1978 1839 153.8 — — — — +104 — -258 69.2% +1.66 4–3 (57%) 7–3 (70%) 108.7 +0.06 1982 1488 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.16
16 1979 1813 147.5 — — — — +7 — -37 57.1% +0.36 0–8 (0%) 4–2 (67%) 93.1 -0.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1980 2055 163.4 — — — — -49 -406 -67 68.7% +1.41 11–9 (55%) 8–7 (53%) 104.9 -7.03 1984 1485 99.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.09
18 1981 2138 166.4 — — — — -89 -332 -9 71.3% +1.67 4–10 (29%) 10–6 (63%) 96.8 -6.74 1985 1518 115.3 — — — — — — +108 42.9% -0.86 0–1 — — +0.31
19 1982 2099 161.9 — — — — -1 -284 +23 69.7% +1.63 7–7 (50%) 7–5 (58%) 102.0 -2.82 1986 1480 96.1 — — — — +51 +34 — 26.7% -1.53 2–0 0–2 — +1.62
20 1983 2163 167.8 — — — — +33 -321 +16 73.1% +1.83 11–6 (65%) 7–5 (58%) 101.0 -4.79 1987 1453 103.6 — — — — +25 +36 +129 40.6% -0.91 4–6 (40%) 6–4 (60%) 98.5 +2.84
21 1984 2061 163.5 — — — — +77 — +84 75.8% +1.98 4–8 (33%) 7–2 (78%) 94.6 -0.74 1988 1413 105.2 — — — — +8 +55 +117 30.6% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 97.9 +1.10
22 1985 2119 161.1 — — — — +48 -302 +85 75.7% +1.82 10–4 (71%) 13–7 (65%) 101.9 +0.23 1989 1543 115.0 — — — — -45 -110 +60 38.9% -0.89 4–4 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 102.8 +0.30
23 1986 2196 175.2 — — — — +23 — +26 75.9% +2.04 2–7 (22%) 7–4 (64%) 95.5 -4.63 1990 1523 107.8 — — — — -25 -143 +110 41.9% -0.52 2–8 (20%) 1–1 — +1.49
24 1987 2256 167.4 — — — — -1 — +39 78.5% +2.08 8–4 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 -3.44 1991 1435 97.6 — — — — +9 -98 — 21.6% -1.87 1–4 (20%) 2–6 (25%) 94.3 +0.83
25 1988 2197 167.5 — — — — +37 — +105 76.5% +1.85 11–5 (69%) 8–6 (57%) 98.7 -3.71 1992 1449 98.4 — — — — +48 — — 38.9% -0.83 4–4 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 103.8 +1.27
26 1989 1961 141.0 — — — — +38 — +226 60.0% +0.72 8–6 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 92.2 +0.34 1993 1471 105.2 — — — — +12 — — 34.3% -1.49 3–2 (60%) 0–2 — +0.04
27 1990 1915 136.1 — — — — +25 — — 58.6% +0.83 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.41 1994 1477 88.6 — — — — — — — 22.2% -2.55 1–0 0–1 — -0.23
28 1991 1823 146.6 — — — — -5 — +351 56.0% +0.62 1–5 (17%) 2–8 (20%) 88.5 -2.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1992 1857 156.5 — — — — +5 — +328 56.4% +0.71 5–3 (63%) 4–5 (44%) 101.5 -2.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1993 1820 148.3 — — — — +6 — +300 52.5% +0.05 4–7 (36%) 3–2 (60%) 95.2 -1.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1994 1700 125.8 — — — — +6 — +296 48.5% -0.04 5–7 (42%) 3–3 (50%) 95.7 +0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1995 1649 116.2 — — — — -2 — +277 38.1% -0.64 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1996 1611 115.9 — — — — -22 — +337 39.3% -0.79 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1997 1636 111.8 — — — — -20 — — 57.1% +0.86 1–0 0–2 — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2304 166.5 — — — — +10 -331 +78 67.8% +1.37 103–105 (50%) 102–76 (57%) 97.2 -4.47 — 1551 106.4 — — — — +1 -13 +105 35.6% -1.07 22–33 (40%) 19–24 (44%) 96.1 +5.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.