H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Pam Shriver vs Manuela Maleeva Fragniere H2H: 7-2

Pam Shriver holds a 7–2 lead over Manuela Maleeva Fragniere in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Pam Shriver leads 4–2 on carpet and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere won the 1988 Brighton semifinal 7-6 2-1 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
7 – 2
9 main-draw meetings
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere
SUI Age 59 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #6 7-6 2-1 (ret.) Pam Shriver #5 Match data Oct 30, 1988* SF Brighton WTA 250 Carpet
Pam Shriver #5 6-3 6-4 Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #8 Match data Oct 23, 1988* F Zurich WTA 250 Carpet
Pam Shriver #4 7-5 4-6 6-2 Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #8 Match data Feb 13, 1988* SF Dallas WTA 250 Hard
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #8 6-2 3-6 7-5 Pam Shriver #4 Match data Nov 16, 1987 QF WTA Finals WTA Finals Carpet
Pam Shriver #5 6-3 6-3 Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #10 Match data Jan 10, 1987* SF Sydney International WTA 500 Grass
Pam Shriver #6 6-2 7-6 Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #10 Match data Jun 15, 1986* F Birmingham WTA 250 Grass
Pam Shriver #4 6-3 6-4 Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #7 Match data Jan 6, 1986 SF Washington Open WTA 250 Carpet
Pam Shriver #8 6-4 0-6 6-4 Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #5 Match data Mar 18, 1985 R16 WTA Finals WTA Finals Carpet
Pam Shriver #4 6-3 6-2 Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #33 Match data Jan 13, 1984* R16 Oakland WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,304 626 278 69.2% 0 0 0 5 19 24
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #5 #3 148 2,130 464 185 71.5% 0 1 0 3 15 19

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Shriver Manuela Maleeva Fragniere
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,838 0 1 1982 15–10 60.0% — 1,687 0 0
16 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,813 0 1 1983 21–16 56.8% — 1,788 0 0
17 1980 47–21 69.1% #9 2,054 0 2 1984 50–16 75.8% #6 2,100 0 5
18 1981 58–25 69.9% #7 2,137 0 4 1985 46–18 71.9% #7 2,074 0 6
19 1982 47–19 71.2% #6 2,098 0 5 1986 42–21 66.7% #8 1,992 0 6
20 1983 52–15 77.6% #4 2,162 0 8 1987 44–15 74.6% #8 2,113 0 8
21 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10 1988 45–15 75.0% #6 2,101 0 10
22 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,118 0 14 1989 34–13 72.3% #9 2,018 0 12
23 1986 47–15 75.8% #6 2,196 0 16 1990 42–16 72.4% #9 2,068 0 12
24 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,255 0 20 1991 43–14 75.4% #10 2,027 0 15
25 1988 60–15 80.0% #5 2,197 0 24 1992 34–13 72.3% #9 1,998 0 16
26 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,960 0 24 1993 36–16 69.2% #11 2,045 0 18
27 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,915 0 24 1994 12–2 85.7% #5 2,067 0 19
28 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,823 0 24 — — — — — — —
29 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,857 0 24 — — — — — — —
30 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24 — — — — — — —
31 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24 — — — — — — —
32 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24 — — — — — — —
33 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24 — — — — — — —
34 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pam Shriver Manuela Maleeva Fragniere
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1978 6 1 7 85.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 1982 2 2 4 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
16 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 1983 3 2 5 60.0% 16 10 26 61.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1980 22 7 29 75.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 9 7 16 56.3% 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 27 5 32 84.4% 4 1 5 80.0% 14 6 20 70.0%
18 1981 15 5 20 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 19 3 22 86.4% 18 15 33 54.5% 1985 7 4 11 63.6% 16 6 22 72.7% 10 3 13 76.9% 13 5 18 72.2%
19 1982 11 4 15 73.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 18 9 27 66.7% 1986 13 5 18 72.2% 13 6 19 68.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 9 8 17 52.9%
20 1983 17 3 20 85.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 13 3 16 81.3% 20 8 28 71.4% 1987 9 3 12 75.0% 19 5 24 79.2% 6 3 9 66.7% 10 4 14 71.4%
21 1984 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 15 4 19 78.9% 19 6 25 76.0% 1988 23 5 28 82.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 13 5 18 72.2%
22 1985 14 3 17 82.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 19 4 23 82.6% 19 4 23 82.6% 1989 15 5 20 75.0% 11 3 14 78.6% — — — — 8 5 13 61.5%
23 1986 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 10 1 11 90.9% 23 9 32 71.9% 1990 19 6 25 76.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 16 6 22 72.7%
24 1987 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — 30 5 35 85.7% 17 5 22 77.3% 1991 16 7 23 69.6% 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 17 4 21 81.0%
25 1988 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 24 4 28 85.7% 16 3 19 84.2% 1992 13 4 17 76.5% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0%
26 1989 12 7 19 63.2% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1993 16 5 21 76.2% 8 7 15 53.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 11 3 14 78.6%
27 1990 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 1994 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — 8 1 9 88.9%
28 1991 11 11 22 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1992 11 9 20 55.0% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1993 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1994 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1995 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1996 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1997 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 196 100 296 66.2% 18 12 30 60.0% 205 61 266 77.1% 204 104 308 66.2% — 145 53 198 73.2% 156 62 218 71.6% 38 20 58 65.5% 125 50 175 71.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pam Shriver Manuela Maleeva Fragniere
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1978 1839 153.8 — — — — +104 — -258 69.2% +1.66 4–3 (57%) 7–3 (70%) 108.7 +0.06 1982 1687 121.9 — — — — -88 -61 -1 55.2% +0.14 6–2 (75%) 3–3 (50%) 105.4 +1.61
16 1979 1813 147.5 — — — — +7 — -37 57.1% +0.36 0–8 (0%) 4–2 (67%) 93.1 -0.83 1983 1788 136.4 — — — — -118 0 -127 57.1% +0.45 4–6 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 99.8 -0.81
17 1980 2055 163.4 — — — — -49 -406 -67 68.7% +1.41 11–9 (55%) 8–7 (53%) 104.9 -7.03 1984 2100 169.1 — — — — -162 +37 -327 70.4% +1.55 13–7 (65%) 6–2 (75%) 112.5 -2.65
18 1981 2138 166.4 — — — — -89 -332 -9 71.3% +1.67 4–10 (29%) 10–6 (63%) 96.8 -6.74 1985 2075 161.4 — — — — -47 +9 -202 70.6% +1.90 6–4 (60%) 5–4 (56%) 99.5 +0.26
19 1982 2099 161.9 — — — — -1 -284 +23 69.7% +1.63 7–7 (50%) 7–5 (58%) 102.0 -2.82 1986 1992 161.4 — — — — -4 +32 -50 65.7% +1.31 7–12 (37%) 5–6 (45%) 90.2 -2.54
20 1983 2163 167.8 — — — — +33 -321 +16 73.1% +1.83 11–6 (65%) 7–5 (58%) 101.0 -4.79 1987 2114 165.6 — — — — -24 -9 -171 68.6% +1.51 14–8 (64%) 4–5 (44%) 101.3 -3.96
21 1984 2061 163.5 — — — — +77 — +84 75.8% +1.98 4–8 (33%) 7–2 (78%) 94.6 -0.74 1988 2102 162.5 — — — — +47 -50 — 73.1% +1.85 5–7 (42%) 6–4 (60%) 96.3 -1.34
22 1985 2119 161.1 — — — — +48 -302 +85 75.7% +1.82 10–4 (71%) 13–7 (65%) 101.9 +0.23 1989 2019 154.6 — — — — +29 +17 — 69.0% +1.48 5–3 (63%) 3–2 (60%) 98.1 +0.98
23 1986 2196 175.2 — — — — +23 — +26 75.9% +2.04 2–7 (22%) 7–4 (64%) 95.5 -4.63 1990 2068 173.2 — — — — +58 -41 — 68.5% +1.77 9–7 (56%) 3–1 (75%) 103.3 -2.84
24 1987 2256 167.4 — — — — -1 — +39 78.5% +2.08 8–4 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 -3.44 1991 2028 159.1 — — — — +51 +26 — 72.7% +1.77 7–4 (64%) 5–5 (50%) 99.7 +1.33
25 1988 2197 167.5 — — — — +37 — +105 76.5% +1.85 11–5 (69%) 8–6 (57%) 98.7 -3.71 1992 1999 152.0 — — — — +87 +17 -90 67.0% +1.41 10–3 (77%) 2–4 (33%) 101.2 +2.30
26 1989 1961 141.0 — — — — +38 — +226 60.0% +0.72 8–6 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 92.2 +0.34 1993 2046 159.7 — — — — +80 -115 — 65.8% +1.04 8–7 (53%) 4–2 (67%) 99.2 -0.01
27 1990 1915 136.1 — — — — +25 — — 58.6% +0.83 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.41 1994 2067 143.1 — — — — +48 — — 77.4% +2.36 3–0 (100%) 0–2 — +0.52
28 1991 1823 146.6 — — — — -5 — +351 56.0% +0.62 1–5 (17%) 2–8 (20%) 88.5 -2.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1992 1857 156.5 — — — — +5 — +328 56.4% +0.71 5–3 (63%) 4–5 (44%) 101.5 -2.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1993 1820 148.3 — — — — +6 — +300 52.5% +0.05 4–7 (36%) 3–2 (60%) 95.2 -1.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1994 1700 125.8 — — — — +6 — +296 48.5% -0.04 5–7 (42%) 3–3 (50%) 95.7 +0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1995 1649 116.2 — — — — -2 — +277 38.1% -0.64 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1996 1611 115.9 — — — — -22 — +337 39.3% -0.79 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1997 1636 111.8 — — — — -20 — — 57.1% +0.86 1–0 0–2 — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2304 166.5 — — — — +10 -331 +78 67.8% +1.37 103–105 (50%) 102–76 (57%) 97.2 -4.47 — 2131 166.2 — — — — +16 -4 -133 68.1% +1.46 97–70 (58%) 48–41 (54%) 101.4 -1.10

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.