H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Pam Shriver vs Mareen Louie Harper H2H: 7-0

Pam Shriver holds a 7–0 lead over Mareen Louie Harper in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Pam Shriver leads 4–0 on hard courts and 3–0 on carpet. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1992 Indian Wells second round 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
7 – 0
7 main draw meetings
Mareen Louie Harper
Age 65

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 26, 1992* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Pam Shriver #35 6-4 6-1 Mareen Louie Harper Match data
Feb 13, 1992* Chicago WTA 250 R32 Carpet Pam Shriver #38 6-2 6-2 Mareen Louie Harper Match data
Apr 30, 1988* Tokyo Pan Pacific WTA 250 QF Carpet Pam Shriver #4 6-1 7-5 Mareen Louie Harper Match data
Nov 6, 1987* Worcester WTA 250 R16 Carpet Pam Shriver #5 6-4 6-2 Mareen Louie Harper Match data
Jul 27, 1985* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 R16 Hard Pam Shriver #4 7-6 6-1 Mareen Louie Harper Match data
Sep 3, 1984* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Pam Shriver #4 6-3 7-5 Mareen Louie Harper Match data
Aug 16, 1984* Mahwah WTA 250 R32 Hard Pam Shriver #4 6-2 6-2 Mareen Louie Harper Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,302 624 277 69.3% 0 0 0 4 20 24
Mareen Louie Harper — — — 1,911 177 239 42.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Shriver Mareen Louie Harper
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1974 2–1 66.7% — 1,523 0 0
15 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,849 0 1 1976 1–2 33.3% — 1,521 0 0
16 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,798 0 1 1977 0–2 0.0% — 1,519 0 0
17 1980 47–21 69.1% — 2,027 0 2 1978 7–12 36.8% — 1,588 0 0
18 1981 58–25 69.9% — 2,122 0 4 1979 4–13 23.5% — 1,567 0 0
19 1982 47–19 71.2% — 2,087 0 5 1980 22–23 48.9% — 1,715 0 0
20 1983 52–15 77.6% — 2,161 0 8 1981 16–20 44.4% — 1,743 0 0
21 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10 1982 9–18 33.3% — 1,654 0 0
22 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,117 0 14 1983 7–10 41.2% — 1,670 0 0
23 1986 47–15 75.8% #5 2,194 0 16 1984 18–17 51.4% — 1,733 0 1
24 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,254 0 20 1985 29–18 61.7% — 1,777 0 2
25 1988 58–14 80.6% #5 2,188 0 24 1986 12–17 41.4% — 1,680 0 2
26 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,955 0 24 1987 9–16 36.0% — 1,625 0 2
27 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,911 0 24 1988 12–17 41.4% — 1,614 0 2
28 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,822 0 24 1989 6–14 30.0% — 1,577 0 2
29 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,858 0 24 1990 10–15 40.0% — 1,591 0 2
30 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24 1991 12–16 42.9% — 1,615 0 2
31 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24 1992 1–7 12.5% — 1,546 0 2
32 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24 — — — — — — —
33 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24 1994 0–1 0.0% — 1,537 0 2
34 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24 — — — — — — —