H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC

Pam Shriver vs Marianne Werdel Witmeyer H2H: 3-2

Pam Shriver holds a 3–2 lead over Marianne Werdel Witmeyer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Pam Shriver leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Marianne Werdel Witmeyer leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer won the 1994 Roland Garros round of 128 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main-draw meetings
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer
USA

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer 6-3 6-2 Pam Shriver #46 Match data May 25, 1994* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Pam Shriver #30 6-4 6-4 Marianne Werdel Witmeyer Match data Apr 8, 1993* R32 Tokyo Japan Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Pam Shriver #33 6-2 6-1 Marianne Werdel Witmeyer Match data Aug 13, 1992* R32 Los Angeles Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Pam Shriver #4 6-1 6-2 Marianne Werdel Witmeyer Match data Feb 12, 1988* R16 Dallas WTA 250 Hard
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer 7-6 3-6 7-6 Pam Shriver #5 Match data Mar 23, 1987 R32 Washington Open WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,304 626 278 69.2% 0 0 0 5 19 24
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer — — — 1,850 181 203 47.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Pam Shriver Marianne Werdel Witmeyer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,838 0 1 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0
1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,813 0 1 1984 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
1980 47–21 69.1% #9 2,054 0 2 1985 6–3 66.7% — 1,541 0 1
1981 58–25 69.9% #7 2,137 0 4 1986 13–10 56.5% — 1,683 0 1
1982 47–19 71.2% #6 2,098 0 5 1987 10–17 37.0% — 1,659 0 1
1983 52–15 77.6% #4 2,162 0 8 1988 11–20 35.5% — 1,586 0 1
1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10 1989 13–17 43.3% — 1,592 0 1
1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,118 0 14 1990 18–18 50.0% — 1,745 0 1
1986 47–15 75.8% #6 2,196 0 16 1991 21–19 52.5% — 1,739 0 1
1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,255 0 20 1992 13–17 43.3% — 1,697 0 1
1988 60–15 80.0% #5 2,197 0 24 1993 21–18 53.8% — 1,748 0 1
1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,960 0 24 1994 22–22 50.0% — 1,773 0 1
1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,915 0 24 1995 20–18 52.6% — 1,787 0 1
1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,823 0 24 1996 8–18 30.8% — 1,665 0 1
1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,857 0 24 1997 5–4 55.6% — 1,673 0 1
1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24 — — — — — — —
1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24 — — — — — — —
1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24 — — — — — — —
1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24 — — — — — — —
1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Pam Shriver Marianne Werdel Witmeyer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1978 6 1 7 85.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 1983 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1979 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 1984 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
1980 22 7 29 75.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 9 7 16 56.3% 1985 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
1981 15 5 20 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 19 3 22 86.4% 18 15 33 54.5% 1986 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
1982 11 4 15 73.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 18 9 27 66.7% 1987 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 5 11 54.5%
1983 17 3 20 85.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 13 3 16 81.3% 20 8 28 71.4% 1988 9 16 25 36.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
1984 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 15 4 19 78.9% 19 6 25 76.0% 1989 11 14 25 44.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
1985 14 3 17 82.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 19 4 23 82.6% 19 4 23 82.6% 1990 14 12 26 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
1986 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 10 1 11 90.9% 23 9 32 71.9% 1991 16 11 27 59.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
1987 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — 30 5 35 85.7% 17 5 22 77.3% 1992 11 12 23 47.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
1988 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 24 4 28 85.7% 16 3 19 84.2% 1993 14 10 24 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
1989 12 7 19 63.2% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1994 15 13 28 53.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
1990 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 1995 14 11 25 56.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7%
1991 11 11 22 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1996 3 10 13 23.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
1992 11 9 20 55.0% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 1997 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
1993 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1994 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1995 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1996 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1997 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 196 100 296 66.2% 18 12 30 60.0% 205 61 266 77.1% 204 104 308 66.2% Career 125 129 254 49.2% 7 20 27 25.9% 11 20 31 35.5% 33 33 66 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Pam Shriver Marianne Werdel Witmeyer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1978 1839 153.8 — — — — +104 — -258 69.2% +1.66 4–3 (57%) 7–3 (70%) 108.7 +0.06 1983 1492 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.02
1979 1813 147.5 — — — — +7 — -37 57.1% +0.36 0–8 (0%) 4–2 (67%) 93.1 -0.83 1984 1478 96.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.29
1980 2055 163.4 — — — — -49 -406 -67 68.7% +1.41 11–9 (55%) 8–7 (53%) 104.9 -7.03 1985 1542 112.3 — — — — +15 — — 63.2% +0.89 1–0 0–1 — +0.37
1981 2138 166.4 — — — — -89 -332 -9 71.3% +1.67 4–10 (29%) 10–6 (63%) 96.8 -6.74 1986 1683 123.1 — — — — +21 — — 50.0% -0.34 8–2 (80%) 5–1 (83%) — +1.30
1982 2099 161.9 — — — — -1 -284 +23 69.7% +1.63 7–7 (50%) 7–5 (58%) 102.0 -2.82 1987 1659 129.2 — — — — +44 — -85 41.9% -0.77 2–6 (25%) 3–0 (100%) — -0.83
1983 2163 167.8 — — — — +33 -321 +16 73.1% +1.83 11–6 (65%) 7–5 (58%) 101.0 -4.79 1988 1587 119.6 — — — — +2 — -37 37.3% -1.03 2–3 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 100.4 -1.05
1984 2061 163.5 — — — — +77 — +84 75.8% +1.98 4–8 (33%) 7–2 (78%) 94.6 -0.74 1989 1592 119.9 — — — — -6 — — 44.1% -0.25 4–4 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 99.6 +2.41
1985 2119 161.1 — — — — +48 -302 +85 75.7% +1.82 10–4 (71%) 13–7 (65%) 101.9 +0.23 1990 1746 136.3 — — — — +8 -257 — 51.7% +0.10 7–10 (41%) 6–4 (60%) 103.1 -0.70
1986 2196 175.2 — — — — +23 — +26 75.9% +2.04 2–7 (22%) 7–4 (64%) 95.5 -4.63 1991 1740 132.5 — — — — +15 -243 -169 48.9% -0.13 10–4 (71%) 5–4 (56%) 103.3 +0.98
1987 2256 167.4 — — — — -1 — +39 78.5% +2.08 8–4 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 -3.44 1992 1697 133.3 — — — — +32 — -146 48.5% 0.00 3–7 (30%) 4–1 (80%) 98.1 +0.32
1988 2197 167.5 — — — — +37 — +105 76.5% +1.85 11–5 (69%) 8–6 (57%) 98.7 -3.71 1993 1749 139.9 — — — — +28 -270 -150 51.6% +0.31 8–5 (62%) 2–2 (50%) 101.6 -0.37
1989 1961 141.0 — — — — +38 — +226 60.0% +0.72 8–6 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 92.2 +0.34 1994 1773 143.7 — — — — +15 -260 -181 48.5% -0.08 9–6 (60%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.29
1990 1915 136.1 — — — — +25 — — 58.6% +0.83 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.41 1995 1788 149.0 — — — — +45 -292 — 54.1% +0.31 5–6 (45%) 3–2 (60%) 101.2 +0.06
1991 1823 146.6 — — — — -5 — +351 56.0% +0.62 1–5 (17%) 2–8 (20%) 88.5 -2.30 1996 1666 124.9 — — — — +54 -192 — 31.6% -1.28 3–2 (60%) 2–0 — +0.43
1992 1857 156.5 — — — — +5 — +328 56.4% +0.71 5–3 (63%) 4–5 (44%) 101.5 -2.50 1997 1673 119.1 — — — — +35 — — 52.6% +0.37 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.07
1993 1820 148.3 — — — — +6 — +300 52.5% +0.05 4–7 (36%) 3–2 (60%) 95.2 -1.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1994 1700 125.8 — — — — +6 — +296 48.5% -0.04 5–7 (42%) 3–3 (50%) 95.7 +0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1995 1649 116.2 — — — — -2 — +277 38.1% -0.64 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1996 1611 115.9 — — — — -22 — +337 39.3% -0.79 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1997 1636 111.8 — — — — -20 — — 57.1% +0.86 1–0 0–2 — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 2304 166.5 — — — — +10 -331 +78 67.8% +1.37 103–105 (50%) 102–76 (57%) 97.2 -4.47 Career 1850 139.7 — — — — +22 -251 -124 47.3% -0.20 63–57 (53%) 39–25 (61%) 108.6 +0.74

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.