H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Pam Shriver vs Marianne Werdel Witmeyer H2H: 3-2

Pam Shriver holds a 3–2 lead over Marianne Werdel Witmeyer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Pam Shriver leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Marianne Werdel Witmeyer leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer won the 1994 Roland Garros first round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 25, 1994* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Marianne Werdel Witmeyer 6-3 6-2 Pam Shriver #46 Match data
Apr 8, 1993* Tokyo Japan Open WTA 250 R32 Hard Pam Shriver #30 6-4 6-4 Marianne Werdel Witmeyer Match data
Aug 13, 1992* Los Angeles WTA 500 R32 Hard Pam Shriver #33 6-2 6-1 Marianne Werdel Witmeyer Match data
Feb 12, 1988* Dallas WTA 250 R16 Hard Pam Shriver #4 6-1 6-2 Marianne Werdel Witmeyer Match data
Mar 23, 1987 Washington WTA 250 R32 Carpet Marianne Werdel Witmeyer 7-6 3-6 7-6 Pam Shriver #5 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,302 624 277 69.3% 0 0 0 4 20 24
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer — — — 1,849 181 203 47.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Pam Shriver Marianne Werdel Witmeyer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,849 0 1 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0
1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,798 0 1 1984 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
1980 47–21 69.1% — 2,027 0 2 1985 6–3 66.7% — 1,542 0 1
1981 58–25 69.9% — 2,122 0 4 1986 13–10 56.5% — 1,683 0 1
1982 47–19 71.2% — 2,087 0 5 1987 10–17 37.0% — 1,659 0 1
1983 52–15 77.6% — 2,161 0 8 1988 11–20 35.5% — 1,588 0 1
1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10 1989 13–17 43.3% — 1,593 0 1
1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,117 0 14 1990 18–18 50.0% — 1,746 0 1
1986 47–15 75.8% #5 2,194 0 16 1991 21–19 52.5% — 1,740 0 1
1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,254 0 20 1992 13–17 43.3% — 1,697 0 1
1988 58–14 80.6% #5 2,188 0 24 1993 21–18 53.8% — 1,748 0 1
1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,955 0 24 1994 22–22 50.0% — 1,772 0 1
1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,911 0 24 1995 20–18 52.6% — 1,780 0 1
1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,822 0 24 1996 8–18 30.8% — 1,663 0 1
1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,858 0 24 1997 5–4 55.6% — 1,672 0 1
1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24 — — — — — — —
1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24 — — — — — — —
1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24 — — — — — — —
1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24 — — — — — — —
1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24 — — — — — — —