H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Pam Shriver vs Mary Joe Fernandez H2H: 2-3

Mary Joe Fernandez holds a 3–2 lead over Pam Shriver in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Mary Joe Fernandez leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mary Joe Fernandez won the 1991 Wimbledon third round 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Mary Joe Fernandez
Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 30, 1991* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Mary Joe Fernandez #6 6-3 7-5 Pam Shriver #38 Match data
Mar 19, 1991* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R16 Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #6 6-2 6-4 Pam Shriver #115 Match data
Aug 12, 1989* Los Angeles WTA 500 QF Hard Pam Shriver #9 6-3 6-4 Mary Joe Fernandez #14 Match data
Feb 25, 1987* Key Biscayne WTA 250 R64 Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #28 6-3 6-4 Pam Shriver #5 Match data
Feb 20, 1987* Boca Raton WTA 250 R16 Hard Pam Shriver #5 6-2 6-1 Mary Joe Fernandez #28 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,302 624 277 69.3% 0 0 0 4 20 24
Mary Joe Fernandez #136 #4 2,114 2,191 409 192 68.1% 0 3 0 1 3 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Shriver Mary Joe Fernandez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
12 — — — — — — — 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,475 0 0
13 — — — — — — — 1985 5–6 45.5% #99 1,554 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1986 18–14 56.2% #27 1,764 0 0
15 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,849 0 1 1987 24–14 63.2% #20 1,895 0 0
16 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,798 0 1 1988 22–11 66.7% #15 1,922 0 0
17 1980 47–21 69.1% — 2,027 0 2 1989 32–15 68.1% #12 1,977 0 0
18 1981 58–25 69.9% — 2,122 0 4 1990 40–10 80.0% #4 2,123 0 2
19 1982 47–19 71.2% — 2,087 0 5 1991 47–18 72.3% #8 2,062 0 2
20 1983 52–15 77.6% — 2,161 0 8 1992 47–16 74.6% #6 2,108 0 2
21 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10 1993 34–13 72.3% #7 2,054 0 3
22 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,117 0 14 1994 21–9 70.0% #14 1,975 0 4
23 1986 47–15 75.8% #5 2,194 0 16 1995 29–11 72.5% #8 2,038 0 6
24 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,254 0 20 1996 26–15 63.4% #16 1,926 0 6
25 1988 58–14 80.6% #5 2,188 0 24 1997 39–16 70.9% #10 1,987 0 7
26 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,955 0 24 1998 8–8 50.0% #77 1,932 0 7
27 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,911 0 24 1999 17–13 56.7% #38 1,890 0 7
28 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,822 0 24 2000 0–1 0.0% #136 1,869 0 7
29 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,858 0 24 — — — — — — —
30 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24 — — — — — — —
31 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24 — — — — — — —
32 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24 — — — — — — —
33 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24 — — — — — — —
34 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24 — — — — — — —