H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Pam Shriver vs Mima Jausovec H2H: 3-1

Pam Shriver holds a 3–1 lead over Mima Jausovec in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Pam Shriver leads 2–1 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1984 Houston third round 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Mima Jausovec
SLO Age 69 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 2, 1984* Houston WTA 250 R32 Carpet Pam Shriver #4 6-3 6-0 Mima Jausovec #23 Match data
Oct 2, 1982* Philadelphia WTA 250 QF Carpet Pam Shriver 6-2 6-4 Mima Jausovec Match data
Oct 24, 1981* Brighton WTA 250 QF Carpet Mima Jausovec 4-6 6-3 6-3 Pam Shriver Match data
Mar 9, 1979* Philadelphia WTA 250 R16 Hard Pam Shriver 6-3 6-1 Mima Jausovec Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,302 624 277 69.3% 0 0 0 4 20 24
Mima Jausovec #400 #23 2 2,088 339 246 57.9% 1 1 0 1 4 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Shriver Mima Jausovec
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,849 0 1 1972 2–0 100.0% — 1,533 0 1
16 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,798 0 1 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,560 0 1
17 1980 47–21 69.1% — 2,027 0 2 1974 18–13 58.1% — 1,790 0 1
18 1981 58–25 69.9% — 2,122 0 4 1975 16–19 45.7% — 1,804 0 1
19 1982 47–19 71.2% — 2,087 0 5 1976 33–16 67.3% — 1,996 0 4
20 1983 52–15 77.6% — 2,161 0 8 1977 32–21 60.4% — 2,008 1 5
21 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10 1978 29–19 60.4% — 1,922 1 6
22 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,117 0 14 1979 32–28 53.3% — 1,866 1 6
23 1986 47–15 75.8% #5 2,194 0 16 1980 34–22 60.7% — 1,941 1 6
24 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,254 0 20 1981 57–28 67.1% — 2,010 1 6
25 1988 58–14 80.6% #5 2,188 0 24 1982 36–24 60.0% — 1,861 1 7
26 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,955 0 24 1983 23–16 59.0% — 1,873 1 7
27 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,911 0 24 1984 12–17 41.4% #87 1,747 1 7
28 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,822 0 24 1985 9–12 42.9% #82 1,695 1 7
29 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,858 0 24 1986 2–4 33.3% #184 1,673 1 7
30 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24 1987 1–3 25.0% #233 1,656 1 7
31 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24 1988 1–3 25.0% #362 1,641 1 7
32 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24 — — — — — — —
33 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24 — — — — — — —
34 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24 — — — — — — —