H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Pam Shriver vs Nicole Bradtke H2H: 5-1

Pam Shriver holds a 5–1 lead over Nicole Bradtke in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Pam Shriver leads 3–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nicole Bradtke won the 1993 Tokyo Japan Open quarterfinal 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Nicole Bradtke
AUS Age 56 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 10, 1993* Tokyo Japan Open WTA 250 QF Hard Nicole Bradtke #40 6-3 6-3 Pam Shriver #30 Match data
Feb 14, 1992* Chicago WTA 250 R16 Carpet Pam Shriver #38 6-0 6-1 Nicole Bradtke #39 Match data
Jan 19, 1990* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Pam Shriver #19 1-6 6-2 9-7 Nicole Bradtke #68 Match data
Mar 11, 1988* Boca Raton WTA 250 R16 Hard Pam Shriver #4 6-4 6-0 Nicole Bradtke #67 Match data
Feb 22, 1988 Washington WTA 250 R32 Hard Pam Shriver #4 6-0 6-4 Nicole Bradtke #62 Match data
Oct 23, 1987* Brighton WTA 250 R32 Carpet Pam Shriver #5 7-6 6-4 Nicole Bradtke #69 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,302 624 277 69.3% 0 0 0 4 20 24
Nicole Bradtke #394 #24 256 1,868 181 162 52.8% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Shriver Nicole Bradtke
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,849 0 1 1985 1–2 33.3% #147 1,507 0 0
16 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,798 0 1 1986 6–5 54.5% #123 1,548 0 0
17 1980 47–21 69.1% — 2,027 0 2 1987 15–19 44.1% #78 1,600 0 0
18 1981 58–25 69.9% — 2,122 0 4 1988 24–17 58.5% #34 1,738 0 0
19 1982 47–19 71.2% — 2,087 0 5 1989 16–17 48.5% #61 1,710 0 0
20 1983 52–15 77.6% — 2,161 0 8 1990 21–20 51.2% #49 1,757 0 0
21 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10 1991 21–19 52.5% #45 1,760 0 0
22 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,117 0 14 1992 21–17 55.3% #47 1,714 0 1
23 1986 47–15 75.8% #5 2,194 0 16 1993 26–14 65.0% #26 1,757 0 2
24 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,254 0 20 1994 2–5 28.6% #153 1,705 0 2
25 1988 58–14 80.6% #5 2,188 0 24 1995 21–15 58.3% #37 1,786 0 3
26 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,955 0 24 1996 6–10 37.5% #94 1,709 0 3
27 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,911 0 24 1997 1–2 33.3% #394 1,697 0 3
28 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,822 0 24 — — — — — — —
29 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,858 0 24 — — — — — — —
30 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24 — — — — — — —
31 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24 — — — — — — —
32 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24 — — — — — — —
33 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24 — — — — — — —
34 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24 — — — — — — —