H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Pam Shriver vs Noelle Van Lottum H2H: 2-0

Pam Shriver holds a 2–0 lead over Noelle Van Lottum in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pam Shriver leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1992 Key Biscayne second round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Noelle Van Lottum
Age 54

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 15, 1992* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R64 Hard Pam Shriver #34 6-3 6-2 Noelle Van Lottum Match data
Jan 16, 1991* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Pam Shriver #56 6-3 6-1 Noelle Van Lottum Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,302 624 277 69.3% 0 0 0 4 20 24
Noelle Van Lottum — — — 1,659 56 96 36.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Shriver Noelle Van Lottum
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,849 0 1 1988 1–1 50.0% — 1,506 0 0
16 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,798 0 1 1989 3–2 60.0% — 1,533 0 0
17 1980 47–21 69.1% — 2,027 0 2 1990 3–2 60.0% — 1,580 0 0
18 1981 58–25 69.9% — 2,122 0 4 1991 8–15 34.8% — 1,531 0 0
19 1982 47–19 71.2% — 2,087 0 5 1992 17–20 45.9% — 1,611 0 1
20 1983 52–15 77.6% — 2,161 0 8 1993 13–21 38.2% — 1,586 0 1
21 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10 1994 7–12 36.8% — 1,577 0 1
22 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,117 0 14 1995 1–9 10.0% — 1,466 0 1
23 1986 47–15 75.8% #5 2,194 0 16 1996 0–2 0.0% — 1,442 0 1
24 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,254 0 20 1997 2–9 18.2% — 1,427 0 1
25 1988 58–14 80.6% #5 2,188 0 24 1998 1–2 33.3% — 1,429 0 1
26 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,955 0 24 1999 0–1 0.0% — 1,416 0 1
27 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,911 0 24 — — — — — — —
28 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,822 0 24 — — — — — — —
29 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,858 0 24 — — — — — — —
30 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24 — — — — — — —
31 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24 — — — — — — —
32 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24 — — — — — — —
33 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24 — — — — — — —
34 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24 — — — — — — —