H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Pam Shriver vs Patricia Hy Boulais H2H: 2-0

Pam Shriver holds a 2–0 lead over Patricia Hy Boulais in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pam Shriver leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1997 Oklahoma round of 32 7-5 6-7 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Patricia Hy Boulais
CAN Age 61 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pam Shriver #217 7-5 6-7 6-3 Patricia Hy Boulais Match data Feb 20, 1997* R32 Oklahoma Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Pam Shriver #64 6-2 6-3 Patricia Hy Boulais Match data Jun 21, 1991* R16 Eastbourne Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,304 626 278 69.2% 0 0 0 5 19 24
Patricia Hy Boulais — — — 1,906 142 165 46.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Shriver Patricia Hy Boulais
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,838 0 1 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
16 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,813 0 1 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1980 47–21 69.1% #9 2,054 0 2 1983 7–8 46.7% — 1,546 0 0
18 1981 58–25 69.9% #7 2,137 0 4 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,522 0 0
19 1982 47–19 71.2% #6 2,098 0 5 — — — — — — —
20 1983 52–15 77.6% #4 2,162 0 8 1986 8–1 88.9% — 1,633 0 1
21 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10 1987 9–15 37.5% — 1,594 0 1
22 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,118 0 14 1988 0–5 0.0% — 1,548 0 1
23 1986 47–15 75.8% #6 2,196 0 16 1989 1–4 20.0% — 1,514 0 1
24 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,255 0 20 1990 7–7 50.0% — 1,573 0 1
25 1988 60–15 80.0% #5 2,197 0 24 1991 18–17 51.4% — 1,704 0 1
26 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,960 0 24 1992 22–16 57.9% — 1,876 0 1
27 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,915 0 24 1993 21–15 58.3% — 1,851 0 1
28 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,823 0 24 1994 15–16 48.4% — 1,756 0 1
29 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,857 0 24 1995 11–14 44.0% — 1,691 0 1
30 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24 1996 10–16 38.5% — 1,687 0 1
31 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24 1997 12–19 38.7% — 1,663 0 1
32 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24 1998 1–8 11.1% — 1,573 0 1
33 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24 — — — — — — —
34 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pam Shriver Patricia Hy Boulais
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1978 6 1 7 85.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1980 22 7 29 75.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 9 7 16 56.3% 1983 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
18 1981 15 5 20 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 19 3 22 86.4% 18 15 33 54.5% 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1982 11 4 15 73.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 18 9 27 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1983 17 3 20 85.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 13 3 16 81.3% 20 8 28 71.4% 1986 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — 5 0 5 100.0%
21 1984 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 15 4 19 78.9% 19 6 25 76.0% 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1985 14 3 17 82.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 19 4 23 82.6% 19 4 23 82.6% 1988 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1986 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 10 1 11 90.9% 23 9 32 71.9% 1989 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1987 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — 30 5 35 85.7% 17 5 22 77.3% 1990 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 1988 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 24 4 28 85.7% 16 3 19 84.2% 1991 13 11 24 54.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1989 12 7 19 63.2% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1992 8 5 13 61.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
27 1990 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 1993 10 9 19 52.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
28 1991 11 11 22 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1994 11 9 20 55.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
29 1992 11 9 20 55.0% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 1995 5 8 13 38.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1993 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1996 1 7 8 12.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
31 1994 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 1997 4 10 14 28.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 1995 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
33 1996 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1997 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 196 100 296 66.2% 18 12 30 60.0% 205 61 266 77.1% 204 104 308 66.2% — 72 85 157 45.9% 28 39 67 41.8% 27 23 50 54.0% 15 18 33 45.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pam Shriver Patricia Hy Boulais
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1978 1839 153.8 — — — — +104 — -258 69.2% +1.66 4–3 (57%) 7–3 (70%) 108.7 +0.06 1981 1493 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.07
16 1979 1813 147.5 — — — — +7 — -37 57.1% +0.36 0–8 (0%) 4–2 (67%) 93.1 -0.83 1982 1477 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.18
17 1980 2055 163.4 — — — — -49 -406 -67 68.7% +1.41 11–9 (55%) 8–7 (53%) 104.9 -7.03 1983 1546 117.5 — — — — +51 — +83 46.9% +0.12 1–1 1–1 — +0.93
18 1981 2138 166.4 — — — — -89 -332 -9 71.3% +1.67 4–10 (29%) 10–6 (63%) 96.8 -6.74 1984 1523 101.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–2 0–1 — +0.06
19 1982 2099 161.9 — — — — -1 -284 +23 69.7% +1.63 7–7 (50%) 7–5 (58%) 102.0 -2.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1983 2163 167.8 — — — — +33 -321 +16 73.1% +1.83 11–6 (65%) 7–5 (58%) 101.0 -4.79 1986 1633 110.5 — — — — +41 — — 69.6% +1.65 5–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) — +2.61
21 1984 2061 163.5 — — — — +77 — +84 75.8% +1.98 4–8 (33%) 7–2 (78%) 94.6 -0.74 1987 1595 115.4 — — — — +48 — +10 37.5% -0.93 5–3 (63%) 1–6 (14%) 97.9 -0.17
22 1985 2119 161.1 — — — — +48 -302 +85 75.7% +1.82 10–4 (71%) 13–7 (65%) 101.9 +0.23 1988 1548 99.0 — — — — +29 — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–2 — -0.27
23 1986 2196 175.2 — — — — +23 — +26 75.9% +2.04 2–7 (22%) 7–4 (64%) 95.5 -4.63 1989 1515 91.9 — — — — +9 — — 20.0% -2.30 — — — +0.31
24 1987 2256 167.4 — — — — -1 — +39 78.5% +2.08 8–4 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 -3.44 1990 1574 118.5 — — — — +7 — — 51.7% +0.41 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.67
25 1988 2197 167.5 — — — — +37 — +105 76.5% +1.85 11–5 (69%) 8–6 (57%) 98.7 -3.71 1991 1704 141.1 — — — — -20 -265 +2 50.0% +0.11 6–4 (60%) 2–1 (67%) 104.8 -0.45
26 1989 1961 141.0 — — — — +38 — +226 60.0% +0.72 8–6 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 92.2 +0.34 1992 1877 155.6 — — — — -71 -231 -109 56.3% +0.35 7–3 (70%) 2–2 (50%) 107.4 -1.82
27 1990 1915 136.1 — — — — +25 — — 58.6% +0.83 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.41 1993 1852 141.8 — — — — -46 -170 +3 57.0% +0.38 6–3 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 105.0 -1.32
28 1991 1823 146.6 — — — — -5 — +351 56.0% +0.62 1–5 (17%) 2–8 (20%) 88.5 -2.30 1994 1756 132.7 — — — — +24 -99 — 52.4% +0.25 2–3 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.3 -0.60
29 1992 1857 156.5 — — — — +5 — +328 56.4% +0.71 5–3 (63%) 4–5 (44%) 101.5 -2.50 1995 1691 125.6 — — — — +15 -27 — 50.0% -0.18 3–9 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 93.7 +0.06
30 1993 1820 148.3 — — — — +6 — +300 52.5% +0.05 4–7 (36%) 3–2 (60%) 95.2 -1.73 1996 1687 132.9 — — — — -41 -41 +161 40.0% -0.73 4–4 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.0 -1.41
31 1994 1700 125.8 — — — — +6 — +296 48.5% -0.04 5–7 (42%) 3–3 (50%) 95.7 +0.51 1997 1664 129.6 — — — — -71 +1 +194 40.3% -0.58 8–7 (53%) 2–5 (29%) 99.0 -0.88
32 1995 1649 116.2 — — — — -2 — +277 38.1% -0.64 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 +0.26 1998 1574 92.9 — — — — -25 -9 — 26.1% -2.00 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — -0.04
33 1996 1611 115.9 — — — — -22 — +337 39.3% -0.79 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1997 1636 111.8 — — — — -20 — — 57.1% +0.86 1–0 0–2 — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2304 166.5 — — — — +10 -331 +78 67.8% +1.37 103–105 (50%) 102–76 (57%) 97.2 -4.47 — 1906 138.1 — — — — -10 -116 +43 47.1% -0.18 50–44 (53%) 22–33 (40%) 98.3 -0.72

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.