H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Pam Shriver vs Patricia Hy Boulais H2H: 2-0

Pam Shriver holds a 2–0 lead over Patricia Hy Boulais in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pam Shriver leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1997 Oklahoma third round 7-5 6-7 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Patricia Hy Boulais
Age 60 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 20, 1997* Oklahoma WTA 250 R32 Hard Pam Shriver #217 7-5 6-7 6-3 Patricia Hy Boulais Match data
Jun 21, 1991* Eastbourne WTA 250 R16 Grass Pam Shriver #64 6-2 6-3 Patricia Hy Boulais Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,302 624 277 69.3% 0 0 0 4 20 24
Patricia Hy Boulais — — — 1,907 140 163 46.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Shriver Patricia Hy Boulais
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,849 0 1 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
16 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,798 0 1 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1980 47–21 69.1% — 2,027 0 2 1983 7–8 46.7% — 1,546 0 0
18 1981 58–25 69.9% — 2,122 0 4 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,522 0 0
19 1982 47–19 71.2% — 2,087 0 5 — — — — — — —
20 1983 52–15 77.6% — 2,161 0 8 1986 8–1 88.9% — 1,633 0 1
21 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10 1987 9–15 37.5% — 1,594 0 1
22 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,117 0 14 1988 0–5 0.0% — 1,530 0 1
23 1986 47–15 75.8% #5 2,194 0 16 1989 1–4 20.0% — 1,500 0 1
24 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,254 0 20 1990 7–7 50.0% — 1,565 0 1
25 1988 58–14 80.6% #5 2,188 0 24 1991 18–17 51.4% — 1,702 0 1
26 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,955 0 24 1992 21–15 58.3% — 1,878 0 1
27 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,911 0 24 1993 21–15 58.3% — 1,852 0 1
28 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,822 0 24 1994 15–16 48.4% — 1,756 0 1
29 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,858 0 24 1995 11–14 44.0% — 1,691 0 1
30 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24 1996 9–15 37.5% — 1,678 0 1
31 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24 1997 12–19 38.7% — 1,660 0 1
32 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24 1998 1–8 11.1% — 1,571 0 1
33 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24 — — — — — — —
34 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24 — — — — — — —