H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Pam Shriver vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 2-0

Pam Shriver holds a 2–0 lead over Sandra Cecchini in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pam Shriver leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1986 Worcester third round 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Sandra Cecchini
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 16, 1986* Worcester WTA 250 R32 Carpet Pam Shriver #4 6-3 6-0 Sandra Cecchini #49 Match data
Jan 12, 1984* Oakland WTA 250 R32 Carpet Pam Shriver #4 6-1 6-2 Sandra Cecchini #106 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,302 624 277 69.3% 0 0 0 4 20 24
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,937 299 215 58.2% 0 0 0 3 8 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Shriver Sandra Cecchini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,849 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,798 0 1 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1980 47–21 69.1% — 2,027 0 2 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,485 0 0
18 1981 58–25 69.9% — 2,122 0 4 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,497 0 0
19 1982 47–19 71.2% — 2,087 0 5 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1
20 1983 52–15 77.6% — 2,161 0 8 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,746 0 2
21 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,635 0 3
22 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,117 0 14 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,860 0 5
23 1986 47–15 75.8% #5 2,194 0 16 1988 34–14 70.8% #21 1,845 0 7
24 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,254 0 20 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8
25 1988 58–14 80.6% #5 2,188 0 24 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,815 0 9
26 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,955 0 24 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,776 0 10
27 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,911 0 24 1992 23–15 60.5% #34 1,824 0 11
28 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,822 0 24 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,725 0 11
29 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,858 0 24 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,840 0 11
30 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11
31 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,629 0 11
32 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,610 0 11
33 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,556 0 11
34 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24 — — — — — — —