H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Pam Shriver vs Tracy Austin H2H: 2-4

Tracy Austin holds a 4–2 lead over Pam Shriver in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Tracy Austin leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Pam Shriver leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1981 Australian Open quarterfinal 7-5 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main-draw meetings
Tracy Austin
USA Age 63 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pam Shriver 7-5 7-6(4) Tracy Austin Match data Dec 11, 1981* QF Australian Open Grand Slam Grass
Tracy Austin 6-2 7-5 Pam Shriver Match data Aug 22, 1981* QF Canadian Open WTA 500 Hard
Tracy Austin 6-2 5-7 6-2 Pam Shriver Match data Aug 2, 1981* F San Diego WTA 500 Hard
Pam Shriver 7-5 6-4 Tracy Austin Match data Jul 3, 1981* QF Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Tracy Austin 6-2 6-3 Pam Shriver Match data Sep 5, 1980* QF US Open Grand Slam Hard
Tracy Austin 6-3 1-6 6-2 Pam Shriver Match data Jan 1, 1979 QF Washington Open WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,304 626 278 69.2% 0 0 0 5 19 24
Tracy Austin #81 #1 19 2,502 339 88 79.4% 2 0 1 5 20 28

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Shriver Tracy Austin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1977 14–8 63.6% — 1,780 0 1
15 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,838 0 1 1978 43–13 76.8% #6 2,057 0 2
16 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,813 0 1 1979 73–12 85.9% #3 2,431 1 9
17 1980 47–21 69.1% #9 2,054 0 2 1980 81–10 89.0% #2 2,450 1 19
18 1981 58–25 69.9% #7 2,137 0 4 1981 56–7 88.9% #2 2,442 2 27
19 1982 47–19 71.2% #6 2,098 0 5 1982 35–12 74.5% #4 2,262 2 28
20 1983 52–15 77.6% #4 2,162 0 8 1983 24–8 75.0% #9 2,185 2 28
21 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10 1984 2–2 50.0% #27 2,136 2 28
22 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,118 0 14 — — — — — — —
23 1986 47–15 75.8% #6 2,196 0 16 — — — — — — —
24 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,255 0 20 — — — — — — —
25 1988 60–15 80.0% #5 2,197 0 24 — — — — — — —
26 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,960 0 24 1989 0–2 0.0% — 2,078 2 28
27 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,915 0 24 — — — — — — —
28 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,823 0 24 — — — — — — —
29 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,857 0 24 — — — — — — —
30 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24 1993 6–6 50.0% #117 1,970 2 28
31 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24 1994 5–8 38.5% #81 1,850 2 28
32 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24 — — — — — — —
33 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24 — — — — — — —
34 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pam Shriver Tracy Austin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 4 2 6 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
15 1978 6 1 7 85.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 1978 16 5 21 76.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 13 3 16 81.3%
16 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 1979 22 4 26 84.6% 10 0 10 100.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 33 6 39 84.6%
17 1980 22 7 29 75.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 9 7 16 56.3% 1980 18 4 22 81.8% 8 1 9 88.9% 11 1 12 91.7% 44 4 48 91.7%
18 1981 15 5 20 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 19 3 22 86.4% 18 15 33 54.5% 1981 22 0 22 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 12 2 14 85.7% 20 4 24 83.3%
19 1982 11 4 15 73.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 18 9 27 66.7% 1982 11 2 13 84.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 15 6 21 71.4%
20 1983 17 3 20 85.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 13 3 16 81.3% 20 8 28 71.4% 1983 — — — — 8 2 10 80.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 12 5 17 70.6%
21 1984 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 15 4 19 78.9% 19 6 25 76.0% 1984 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1985 14 3 17 82.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 19 4 23 82.6% 19 4 23 82.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1986 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 10 1 11 90.9% 23 9 32 71.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1987 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — 30 5 35 85.7% 17 5 22 77.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1988 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 24 4 28 85.7% 16 3 19 84.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1989 12 7 19 63.2% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1990 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1991 11 11 22 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1992 11 9 20 55.0% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1993 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1993 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
31 1994 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 1994 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 1995 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1996 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1997 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 196 100 296 66.2% 18 12 30 60.0% 205 61 266 77.1% 204 104 308 66.2% — 101 26 127 79.5% 44 13 57 77.2% 49 14 63 77.8% 141 34 175 80.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pam Shriver Tracy Austin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1780 149.9 — — — — -85 -30 — 59.1% +0.55 2–0 1–0 — -1.15
15 1978 1839 153.8 — — — — +104 — -258 69.2% +1.66 4–3 (57%) 7–3 (70%) 108.7 +0.06 1978 2057 163.2 — — — — +12 -252 -337 72.6% +1.96 6–3 (67%) 7–2 (78%) 108.8 -0.48
16 1979 1813 147.5 — — — — +7 — -37 57.1% +0.36 0–8 (0%) 4–2 (67%) 93.1 -0.83 1979 2431 178.8 — — — — +6 -369 -545 80.9% +2.33 13–3 (81%) 6–3 (67%) 110.9 -9.11
17 1980 2055 163.4 — — — — -49 -406 -67 68.7% +1.41 11–9 (55%) 8–7 (53%) 104.9 -7.03 1980 2451 179.3 — — — — +144 -317 -403 85.3% +3.11 12–3 (80%) 4–2 (67%) 104.4 -3.63
18 1981 2138 166.4 — — — — -89 -332 -9 71.3% +1.67 4–10 (29%) 10–6 (63%) 96.8 -6.74 1981 2442 175.7 — — — — +118 -334 -333 84.6% +2.88 7–3 (70%) 7–4 (64%) 101.7 -3.49
19 1982 2099 161.9 — — — — -1 -284 +23 69.7% +1.63 7–7 (50%) 7–5 (58%) 102.0 -2.82 1982 2263 167.1 — — — — +182 -144 -203 75.5% +2.05 4–6 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 94.0 -1.08
20 1983 2163 167.8 — — — — +33 -321 +16 73.1% +1.83 11–6 (65%) 7–5 (58%) 101.0 -4.79 1983 2186 159.6 — — — — +138 -57 -80 76.5% +1.88 2–4 (33%) 4–1 (80%) 94.9 -1.73
21 1984 2061 163.5 — — — — +77 — +84 75.8% +1.98 4–8 (33%) 7–2 (78%) 94.6 -0.74 1984 2137 114.9 — — — — +108 — — 50.0% +0.13 — — — +0.03
22 1985 2119 161.1 — — — — +48 -302 +85 75.7% +1.82 10–4 (71%) 13–7 (65%) 101.9 +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1986 2196 175.2 — — — — +23 — +26 75.9% +2.04 2–7 (22%) 7–4 (64%) 95.5 -4.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1987 2256 167.4 — — — — -1 — +39 78.5% +2.08 8–4 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 -3.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1988 2197 167.5 — — — — +37 — +105 76.5% +1.85 11–5 (69%) 8–6 (57%) 98.7 -3.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1989 1961 141.0 — — — — +38 — +226 60.0% +0.72 8–6 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 92.2 +0.34 1989 2079 101.4 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.04
27 1990 1915 136.1 — — — — +25 — — 58.6% +0.83 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1991 1823 146.6 — — — — -5 — +351 56.0% +0.62 1–5 (17%) 2–8 (20%) 88.5 -2.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1992 1857 156.5 — — — — +5 — +328 56.4% +0.71 5–3 (63%) 4–5 (44%) 101.5 -2.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1993 1820 148.3 — — — — +6 — +300 52.5% +0.05 4–7 (36%) 3–2 (60%) 95.2 -1.73 1993 1970 123.3 — — — — +25 — — 46.4% -0.97 3–1 (75%) — — -0.65
31 1994 1700 125.8 — — — — +6 — +296 48.5% -0.04 5–7 (42%) 3–3 (50%) 95.7 +0.51 1994 1851 118.5 — — — — +76 +127 — 36.7% -0.97 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — -1.54
32 1995 1649 116.2 — — — — -2 — +277 38.1% -0.64 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1996 1611 115.9 — — — — -22 — +337 39.3% -0.79 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1997 1636 111.8 — — — — -20 — — 57.1% +0.86 1–0 0–2 — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2304 166.5 — — — — +10 -331 +78 67.8% +1.37 103–105 (50%) 102–76 (57%) 97.2 -4.47 — 2502 175.2 — — — — +84 -168 -342 76.2% +2.12 52–25 (68%) 33–14 (70%) 109.1 -5.41

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.