H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Pam Shriver vs Wiltrud Probst H2H: 2-0

Pam Shriver holds a 2–0 lead over Wiltrud Probst in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pam Shriver leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1988 Boca Raton third round 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Wiltrud Probst
GER Age 57 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 10, 1988* Boca Raton WTA 250 R32 Hard Pam Shriver #4 6-1 6-1 Wiltrud Probst #102 Match data
Jan 8, 1988* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Grass Pam Shriver #4 6-1 6-2 Wiltrud Probst #101 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,302 624 277 69.3% 0 0 0 4 20 24
Wiltrud Probst #794 #31 344 1,757 119 161 42.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Shriver Wiltrud Probst
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,849 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,798 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1980 47–21 69.1% — 2,027 0 2 1986 4–5 44.4% #135 1,510 0 0
18 1981 58–25 69.9% — 2,122 0 4 1987 9–14 39.1% #99 1,570 0 0
19 1982 47–19 71.2% — 2,087 0 5 1988 13–17 43.3% #80 1,622 0 0
20 1983 52–15 77.6% — 2,161 0 8 1989 11–13 45.8% #90 1,651 0 0
21 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10 1990 19–14 57.6% #40 1,707 0 1
22 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,117 0 14 1991 9–18 33.3% #126 1,581 0 1
23 1986 47–15 75.8% #5 2,194 0 16 1992 16–13 55.2% #40 1,707 0 2
24 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,254 0 20 1993 10–18 35.7% #105 1,611 0 2
25 1988 58–14 80.6% #5 2,188 0 24 1994 11–14 44.0% #69 1,630 0 2
26 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,955 0 24 1995 7–11 38.9% #146 1,616 0 2
27 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,911 0 24 1996 1–6 14.3% #113 1,574 0 2
28 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,822 0 24 1997 7–9 43.8% #84 1,620 0 2
29 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,858 0 24 1998 2–9 18.2% #194 1,569 0 2
30 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24 — — — — — — —
31 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24 — — — — — — —
32 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24 — — — — — — —
33 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24 — — — — — — —
34 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24 — — — — — — —