H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Pam Shriver vs Zina Garrison H2H: 8-8

Pam Shriver and Zina Garrison are tied 8–8 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 16 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on hard courts, while Pam Shriver leads 3–2 on carpet. Most recently, Zina Garrison won the 1993 Birmingham quarterfinal 4-6 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Shriver

USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H

8 – 8

16 main-draw meetings

Zina Garrison

USA Age 62 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

.mobile-filter-details > .mobile-filter-details__toggle { display: none; } .mobile-filter-details > .mobile-filter-details__toggle + .mobile-filter-details__fields { display: flex; flex-wrap: wrap; }

Player	Score	Player	Match Data	Date	Round	Tournament	Category	Surface
Zina Garrison #25	4-6 6-3 6-2	Pam Shriver #32	Match data	Jun 12, 1993*	QF	Birmingham	Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250	Grass
Pam Shriver #33	2-6 6-4 7-5	Zina Garrison #18	Match data	Nov 6, 1992*	R16	Oakland	Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500	Carpet
Zina Garrison #16	7-5 6-2	Pam Shriver #33	Match data	Aug 14, 1992*	R16	Los Angeles	Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500	Hard
Pam Shriver #33	7-5 6-3	Zina Garrison #13	Match data	Jun 13, 1992*	QF	Birmingham	Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250	Grass
Zina Garrison #15	6-4 6-2	Pam Shriver #41	Match data	Jan 19, 1992*	R32	Australian Open	Grand Slam	Hard
Zina Garrison #5	6-2 6-0	Pam Shriver #13	Match data	Nov 11, 1989*	QF	Chicago	WTA 250	Carpet
Zina Garrison #5	6-0 6-1	Pam Shriver #10	Match data	Jul 23, 1989*	F	Newport	WTA 250	Grass
Zina Garrison #9	6-2 6-3	Pam Shriver #5	Match data	Sep 29, 1988*	QF	Seoul Olympics	Olympics	Hard
Pam Shriver #4	6-4 6-4	Zina Garrison #13	Match data	Jul 1, 1988*	QF	Wimbledon	Grand Slam	Grass
Pam Shriver #5	6-4 6-2	Zina Garrison #8	Match data	Oct 17, 1987*	QF	Porsche Tennis Grand Prix	WTA 250	Carpet
Pam Shriver #5	6-4 6-1	Zina Garrison #7	Match data	Aug 23, 1987*	F	Canadian Open	WTA 500	Hard
Zina Garrison #11	6-2 6-4	Pam Shriver #5	Match data	Jan 11, 1987*	F	Sydney International	WTA 500	Grass
Pam Shriver #4	7-6 6-4	Zina Garrison #7	Match data	Jul 28, 1985*	SF	Manhattan Beach	Series Category 4 → modern equivalent WTA 500	Hard
Zina Garrison #9	6-4 2-6 6-3	Pam Shriver #4	Match data	Sep 29, 1984*	SF	New Orleans	WTA 250	Carpet
Pam Shriver #4	6-1 6-1	Zina Garrison #8	Match data	Aug 18, 1984*	SF	Mahwah	WTA 250	Hard
Pam Shriver	4-6 6-1 6-3	Zina Garrison	Match data	Feb 19, 1982*	R16	Houston	WTA 250	Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000 including documented historical predecessor categories	Finals	500 including documented historical predecessor categories	250 including documented historical predecessor categories	Titles
Pam Shriver	#234	#3	163	2,304	626	278	69.2%	0	0	0	5	19	24
Zina Garrison	#318	#4	134	2,146	584	270	68.4%	0	0	0	2	13	15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Pam Shriver							Zina Garrison
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
15	1978	23–8	74.2%	—	1,838	0	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
16	1979	16–16	50.0%	—	1,813	0	1	1980	2–2	50.0%	—	1,529	0	1
17	1980	47–21	69.1%	#9	2,054	0	2	1981	5–5	50.0%	—	1,569	0	1
18	1981	58–25	69.9%	#7	2,137	0	4	1982	23–15	60.5%	—	1,853	0	1
19	1982	47–19	71.2%	#6	2,098	0	5	1983	38–18	67.9%	#10	1,990	0	1
20	1983	52–15	77.6%	#4	2,162	0	8	1984	47–20	70.1%	#9	2,012	0	2
21	1984	44–13	77.2%	#4	2,060	0	10	1985	51–18	73.9%	#8	2,033	0	4
22	1985	54–13	80.6%	#4	2,118	0	14	1986	48–22	68.6%	#11	2,000	0	5
23	1986	47–15	75.8%	#6	2,196	0	16	1987	44–17	72.1%	#9	1,988	0	7
24	1987	60–13	82.2%	#4	2,255	0	20	1988	52–21	71.2%	#9	2,043	0	7
25	1988	60–15	80.0%	#5	2,197	0	24	1989	60–15	80.0%	#4	2,135	0	10
26	1989	24–14	63.2%	#18	1,960	0	24	1990	48–18	72.7%	#10	2,041	0	11
27	1990	8–5	61.5%	#66	1,915	0	24	1991	37–18	67.3%	#12	1,963	0	11
28	1991	21–18	53.8%	#37	1,823	0	24	1992	36–20	64.3%	#18	1,915	0	12
29	1992	25–18	58.1%	#30	1,857	0	24	1993	43–19	69.4%	#14	1,995	0	14
30	1993	14–13	51.9%	#38	1,819	0	24	1994	24–16	60.0%	#24	1,888	0	14
31	1994	13–16	44.8%	#63	1,699	0	24	1995	25–16	61.0%	#22	1,868	0	15
32	1995	7–11	38.9%	#110	1,649	0	24	1996	1–10	9.1%	#273	1,711	0	15
33	1996	4–9	30.8%	#189	1,611	0	24	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	1997	2–1	66.7%	#234	1,635	0	24	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age	Pam Shriver																	Zina Garrison
	Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet				Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet
	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %
15	1978	6	1	7	85.7%	1	1	2	50.0%	3	3	6	50.0%	10	2	12	83.3%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
16	1979	2	4	6	33.3%	1	1	2	50.0%	11	6	17	64.7%	2	5	7	28.6%	1980	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%
17	1980	22	7	29	75.9%	3	2	5	60.0%	13	5	18	72.2%	9	7	16	56.3%	1981	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	3	3	6	50.0%
18	1981	15	5	20	75.0%	6	2	8	75.0%	19	3	22	86.4%	18	15	33	54.5%	1982	5	4	9	55.6%	7	3	10	70.0%	10	4	14	71.4%	0	3	3	0.0%
19	1982	11	4	15	73.3%	3	2	5	60.0%	15	4	19	78.9%	18	9	27	66.7%	1983	6	2	8	75.0%	11	6	17	64.7%	13	5	18	72.2%	8	5	13	61.5%
20	1983	17	3	20	85.0%	2	1	3	66.7%	13	3	16	81.3%	20	8	28	71.4%	1984	11	3	14	78.6%	15	6	21	71.4%	6	5	11	54.5%	15	6	21	71.4%
21	1984	10	3	13	76.9%	—	—	—	—	15	4	19	78.9%	19	6	25	76.0%	1985	14	3	17	82.4%	12	4	16	75.0%	11	4	15	73.3%	14	7	21	66.7%
22	1985	14	3	17	82.4%	2	2	4	50.0%	19	4	23	82.6%	19	4	23	82.6%	1986	21	5	26	80.8%	7	5	12	58.3%	4	2	6	66.7%	16	10	26	61.5%
23	1986	14	5	19	73.7%	—	—	—	—	10	1	11	90.9%	23	9	32	71.9%	1987	15	5	20	75.0%	8	4	12	66.7%	8	1	9	88.9%	13	7	20	65.0%
24	1987	13	3	16	81.3%	—	—	—	—	30	5	35	85.7%	17	5	22	77.3%	1988	28	10	38	73.7%	13	6	19	68.4%	9	3	12	75.0%	2	2	4	50.0%
25	1988	20	8	28	71.4%	—	—	—	—	24	4	28	85.7%	16	3	19	84.2%	1989	30	6	36	83.3%	3	2	5	60.0%	12	3	15	80.0%	15	4	19	78.9%
26	1989	12	7	19	63.2%	—	—	—	—	7	3	10	70.0%	5	4	9	55.6%	1990	18	6	24	75.0%	6	4	10	60.0%	12	2	14	85.7%	12	6	18	66.7%
27	1990	3	3	6	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	5	2	7	71.4%	1991	18	8	26	69.2%	2	3	5	40.0%	7	2	9	77.8%	10	5	15	66.7%
28	1991	11	11	22	50.0%	—	—	—	—	7	3	10	70.0%	3	4	7	42.9%	1992	18	6	24	75.0%	5	4	9	55.6%	5	3	8	62.5%	8	7	15	53.3%
29	1992	11	9	20	55.0%	—	—	—	—	6	3	9	66.7%	8	6	14	57.1%	1993	22	8	30	73.3%	0	3	3	0.0%	9	3	12	75.0%	12	5	17	70.6%
30	1993	4	6	10	40.0%	—	—	—	—	3	2	5	60.0%	7	5	12	58.3%	1994	12	7	19	63.2%	0	3	3	0.0%	8	2	10	80.0%	4	4	8	50.0%
31	1994	7	7	14	50.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	4	3	7	57.1%	2	5	7	28.6%	1995	7	6	13	53.8%	1	4	5	20.0%	9	2	11	81.8%	8	4	12	66.7%
32	1995	1	4	5	20.0%	—	—	—	—	4	3	7	57.1%	2	4	6	33.3%	1996	0	5	5	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	1	4	5	20.0%
33	1996	1	6	7	14.3%	—	—	—	—	2	2	4	50.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	1997	2	1	3	66.7%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	196	100	296	66.2%	18	12	30	60.0%	205	61	266	77.1%	204	104	308	66.2%	—	225	86	311	72.3%	90	58	148	60.8%	123	41	164	75.0%	142	83	225	63.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age	Pam Shriver																Zina Garrison
Age	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule
15	1978	1839	153.8	—	—	—	—	+104	—	-258	69.2%	+1.66	4–3 (57%)	7–3 (70%)	108.7	+0.06	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
16	1979	1813	147.5	—	—	—	—	+7	—	-37	57.1%	+0.36	0–8 (0%)	4–2 (67%)	93.1	-0.83	1980	1529	117.3	—	—	—	—	+48	—	—	55.6%	+0.56	0–1	—	—	+0.25
17	1980	2055	163.4	—	—	—	—	-49	-406	-67	68.7%	+1.41	11–9 (55%)	8–7 (53%)	104.9	-7.03	1981	1570	122.3	—	—	—	—	+74	—	—	54.5%	+0.55	2–2 (50%)	—	—	+1.08
18	1981	2138	166.4	—	—	—	—	-89	-332	-9	71.3%	+1.67	4–10 (29%)	10–6 (63%)	96.8	-6.74	1982	1854	155.0	—	—	—	—	-185	-170	-50	57.5%	+0.46	7–4 (64%)	4–3 (57%)	108.3	-5.41
19	1982	2099	161.9	—	—	—	—	-1	-284	+23	69.7%	+1.63	7–7 (50%)	7–5 (58%)	102.0	-2.82	1983	1991	154.6	—	—	—	—	-125	-109	-50	65.0%	+0.87	7–2 (78%)	7–6 (54%)	108.1	-2.31
20	1983	2163	167.8	—	—	—	—	+33	-321	+16	73.1%	+1.83	11–6 (65%)	7–5 (58%)	101.0	-4.79	1984	2013	157.3	—	—	—	—	+15	-96	-60	65.1%	+1.21	12–7 (63%)	7–2 (78%)	105.1	+0.09
21	1984	2061	163.5	—	—	—	—	+77	—	+84	75.8%	+1.98	4–8 (33%)	7–2 (78%)	94.6	-0.74	1985	2033	160.2	—	—	—	—	+49	-57	-42	67.7%	+1.56	15–5 (75%)	4–11 (27%)	96.5	+1.14
22	1985	2119	161.1	—	—	—	—	+48	-302	+85	75.7%	+1.82	10–4 (71%)	13–7 (65%)	101.9	+0.23	1986	2001	159.2	—	—	—	—	+95	-126	-21	66.0%	+1.22	10–7 (59%)	8–6 (57%)	98.3	-1.84
23	1986	2196	175.2	—	—	—	—	+23	—	+26	75.9%	+2.04	2–7 (22%)	7–4 (64%)	95.5	-4.63	1987	1988	166.8	—	—	—	—	+36	-60	+137	69.6%	+1.50	7–6 (54%)	6–4 (60%)	100.4	-2.77
24	1987	2256	167.4	—	—	—	—	-1	—	+39	78.5%	+2.08	8–4 (67%)	6–3 (67%)	102.7	-3.44	1988	2043	162.0	—	—	—	—	+19	-89	+75	68.1%	+1.43	9–7 (56%)	7–3 (70%)	101.1	-4.39
25	1988	2197	167.5	—	—	—	—	+37	—	+105	76.5%	+1.85	11–5 (69%)	8–6 (57%)	98.7	-3.71	1989	2135	170.0	—	—	—	—	+59	-212	-20	76.4%	+2.14	8–7 (53%)	10–3 (77%)	101.5	-0.28
26	1989	1961	141.0	—	—	—	—	+38	—	+226	60.0%	+0.72	8–6 (57%)	2–2 (50%)	92.2	+0.34	1990	2041	161.7	—	—	—	—	+14	-144	+213	68.5%	+1.50	11–10 (52%)	4–5 (44%)	95.8	-1.68
27	1990	1915	136.1	—	—	—	—	+25	—	—	58.6%	+0.83	2–1 (67%)	1–1	—	+0.41	1991	1964	153.9	—	—	—	—	+30	-134	+240	63.1%	+0.89	9–5 (64%)	3–3 (50%)	98.7	+1.03
28	1991	1823	146.6	—	—	—	—	-5	—	+351	56.0%	+0.62	1–5 (17%)	2–8 (20%)	88.5	-2.30	1992	1915	157.8	—	—	—	—	+39	-53	+312	62.5%	+0.84	9–7 (56%)	5–3 (63%)	97.2	+0.17
29	1992	1857	156.5	—	—	—	—	+5	—	+328	56.4%	+0.71	5–3 (63%)	4–5 (44%)	101.5	-2.50	1993	1996	160.6	—	—	—	—	+22	-217	+199	67.4%	+1.23	8–7 (53%)	8–4 (67%)	100.2	+0.22
30	1993	1820	148.3	—	—	—	—	+6	—	+300	52.5%	+0.05	4–7 (36%)	3–2 (60%)	95.2	-1.73	1994	1889	145.3	—	—	—	—	+24	-186	+259	54.3%	+0.13	10–4 (71%)	7–2 (78%)	102.6	-0.25
31	1994	1700	125.8	—	—	—	—	+6	—	+296	48.5%	-0.04	5–7 (42%)	3–3 (50%)	95.7	+0.51	1995	1868	147.9	—	—	—	—	+29	-240	+311	61.2%	+0.83	6–10 (38%)	5–3 (63%)	91.6	+1.45
32	1995	1649	116.2	—	—	—	—	-2	—	+277	38.1%	-0.64	4–2 (67%)	2–2 (50%)	101.7	+0.26	1996	1712	111.8	—	—	—	—	+23	—	—	20.8%	-1.50	1–3 (25%)	1–1	—	+0.20
33	1996	1611	115.9	—	—	—	—	-22	—	+337	39.3%	-0.79	1–3 (25%)	1–1	—	-0.33	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	1997	1636	111.8	—	—	—	—	-20	—	—	57.1%	+0.86	1–0	0–2	—	-0.20	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	2304	166.5	—	—	—	—	+10	-331	+78	67.8%	+1.37	103–105 (50%)	102–76 (57%)	97.2	-4.47	—	2146	164.6	—	—	—	—	+27	-112	+91	65.2%	+1.16	131–94 (58%)	86–59 (59%)	101.4	-1.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.

Pam Shriver's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Martina Navratilova	3	39	42	Mar 28, 1992	H2H
Chris Evert	4	18	22	Nov 14, 1988	H2H
Wendy Turnbull	10	11	21	Mar 21, 1987	H2H
Zina Garrison	8	8	16	Jun 12, 1993	H2H
Bettina Bunge	11	4	15	Nov 7, 1987	H2H

Zina Garrison's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Martina Navratilova	1	33	34	Nov 7, 1993	H2H
Pam Shriver	8	8	16	Jun 12, 1993	H2H
Steffi Graf	2	12	14	Nov 11, 1995	H2H
Lori Mcneil	6	8	14	Jun 18, 1995	H2H
Nathalie Tauziat	10	3	13	Nov 14, 1996	H2H