H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Pam Teeguarden vs Anne Hobbs H2H: 1-2

Anne Hobbs holds a 2–1 lead over Pam Teeguarden in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Pam Teeguarden leads 1–0 on carpet, while Anne Hobbs leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anne Hobbs won the 1984 Birmingham round of 64 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Teeguarden
USA Age 75 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Anne Hobbs
GBR Age 67 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anne Hobbs #55 6-4 6-4 Pam Teeguarden Match data Jun 13, 1984* R64 Birmingham WTA 250 Grass
Anne Hobbs 6-3 2-6 6-4 Pam Teeguarden Match data Aug 19, 1981* R64 Canadian Open WTA 500 Hard
Pam Teeguarden 7-6 6-1 Anne Hobbs Match data Sep 25, 1980* R32 Atlanta WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pam Teeguarden — — — 1,922 246 297 45.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Anne Hobbs — #35 18 1,834 172 164 51.2% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Teeguarden Anne Hobbs
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1976 7–7 50.0% — 1,550 0 0
17 1968 12–17 41.4% — 1,488 0 0 1977 6–6 50.0% — 1,573 0 2
18 1969 5–11 31.2% — 1,493 0 0 1978 23–13 63.9% — 1,720 0 3
19 1970 19–19 50.0% — 1,612 0 1 1979 12–11 52.2% — 1,749 0 3
20 1971 17–21 44.7% — 1,679 0 1 1980 27–19 58.7% — 1,752 0 5
21 1972 31–25 55.4% — 1,868 0 1 1981 22–18 55.0% — 1,825 0 5
22 1973 22–23 48.9% — 1,839 0 1 1982 8–13 38.1% — 1,727 0 6
23 1974 22–18 55.0% — 1,901 0 3 1983 18–19 48.6% — 1,751 0 7
24 1975 21–25 45.7% — 1,816 0 3 1984 14–14 50.0% #59 1,736 0 7
25 1976 7–14 33.3% — 1,779 0 3 1985 13–12 52.0% — 1,777 0 8
26 1977 14–20 41.2% — 1,763 0 3 1986 6–14 30.0% #99 1,680 0 8
27 1978 11–19 36.7% — 1,724 0 3 1987 14–11 56.0% #42 1,714 0 8
28 1979 13–19 40.6% — 1,747 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 1980 17–16 51.5% — 1,803 0 3 1989 2–7 22.2% #231 1,610 0 8
30 1981 20–19 51.3% — 1,790 0 4 — — — — — — —
31 1982 3–10 23.1% — 1,684 0 4 — — — — — — —
32 1983 4–6 40.0% — 1,652 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 1984 8–11 42.1% — 1,615 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 1985 0–4 0.0% — 1,588 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pam Teeguarden Anne Hobbs
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0%
17 1968 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
18 1969 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
19 1970 7 3 10 70.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1979 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1971 3 2 5 60.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1980 2 4 6 33.3% 13 4 17 76.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
21 1972 3 3 6 50.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 0 7 7 0.0% 1981 1 3 4 25.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 3 7 57.1%
22 1973 5 4 9 55.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 1982 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 5 6 16.7%
23 1974 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 1983 7 3 10 70.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 7 11 36.4%
24 1975 2 5 7 28.6% 14 10 24 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 8 9 11.1% 1984 1 4 5 20.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 1985 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 1977 2 4 6 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1986 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0%
27 1978 2 7 9 22.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 1987 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 10 7 17 58.8% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1979 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1980 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1989 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 1981 1 5 6 16.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 9 15 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1985 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 57 66 123 46.3% 70 82 152 46.1% 75 65 140 53.6% 36 83 119 30.3% — 19 31 50 38.0% 34 36 70 48.6% 71 50 121 58.7% 29 42 71 40.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pam Teeguarden Anne Hobbs
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1551 106.9 — — — — +100 — — 50.0% -0.13 1–3 (25%) — — +2.72
17 1968 1489 104.8 — — — — +4 -5 +11 45.0% -0.33 1–5 (17%) — — -0.27 1977 1574 106.1 — — — — +108 -76 — 44.8% -0.31 4–1 (80%) 0–1 — +2.73
18 1969 1494 104.2 — — — — — -42 +25 36.1% -1.11 1–3 (25%) — — -0.40 1978 1720 125.0 — — — — -15 — -73 59.5% +0.81 8–4 (67%) 5–3 (63%) 105.9 +1.71
19 1970 1613 133.6 — — — — +18 -130 -29 52.9% +0.58 2–9 (18%) 0–1 — -0.45 1979 1750 138.2 — — — — -75 — -19 50.0% -0.20 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 99.4 -1.78
20 1971 1679 136.1 — — — — +4 -80 -95 47.1% +0.06 3–6 (33%) 0–2 — -0.97 1980 1752 132.6 — — — — -133 -51 -43 56.6% +0.60 8–6 (57%) 3–5 (38%) 100.9 -0.11
21 1972 1868 151.0 — — — — -247 -107 -5 55.4% +0.26 4–9 (31%) 1–1 — -7.14 1981 1825 132.4 — — — — -129 -98 -24 51.6% +0.07 10–5 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 104.7 -2.57
22 1973 1839 149.0 — — — — -139 -96 +71 50.5% -0.06 6–9 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 100.2 -9.15 1982 1728 117.2 — — — — -110 -94 +65 43.4% -0.13 4–7 (36%) 2–3 (40%) 95.7 -0.54
23 1974 1902 145.5 — — — — -77 -170 +7 52.8% +0.33 6–3 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — -3.82 1983 1752 128.9 — — — — -64 -56 +25 47.7% -0.24 7–5 (58%) 4–4 (50%) 100.4 +0.58
24 1975 1817 144.3 — — — — -102 +1 +95 46.8% -0.11 8–9 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 99.4 -4.09 1984 1736 126.0 — — — — -107 -51 +109 50.7% -0.03 7–8 (47%) 4–1 (80%) 102.3 +0.76
25 1976 1779 135.2 — — — — -111 -7 +168 38.0% -1.00 3–5 (38%) — — -3.00 1985 1778 134.0 — — — — -156 — +123 51.9% -0.06 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.21
26 1977 1764 141.6 — — — — -106 -1 +156 41.4% -0.63 3–3 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 98.3 -3.70 1986 1680 122.2 — — — — -134 -59 +222 32.6% -1.09 3–3 (50%) 0–2 — -1.22
27 1978 1724 122.8 — — — — -146 -12 +180 36.8% -0.90 5–5 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 97.4 -2.04 1987 1715 125.8 — — — — -121 — +118 53.6% +0.21 4–4 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 97.9 +1.55
28 1979 1748 144.5 — — — — -120 -20 +182 42.7% -0.37 5–6 (45%) 4–7 (36%) 99.5 -1.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1980 1803 134.7 — — — — -94 -69 +93 48.1% -0.16 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) 101.0 -1.52 1989 1611 99.5 — — — — -110 — +183 30.4% -1.52 2–3 (40%) 0–1 — +1.06
30 1981 1790 134.8 — — — — -127 -12 +88 52.2% +0.34 6–8 (43%) 3–4 (43%) 97.5 -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1982 1684 118.6 — — — — -147 — +189 31.3% -1.16 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1983 1653 106.0 — — — — -84 +78 — 45.8% -0.13 1–3 (25%) 2–3 (40%) 96.0 +0.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1984 1616 107.2 — — — — -38 +69 +200 40.9% -0.93 4–2 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 105.0 +1.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1985 1589 113.4 — — — — -41 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — -0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1923 143.1 — — — — -97 -51 +59 46.5% -0.19 67–96 (41%) 36–49 (42%) 93.3 -6.83 — 1835 133.0 — — — — -75 -67 +52 50.1% +0.01 63–54 (54%) 27–30 (47%) 100.4 +1.40

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.