H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Pam Teeguarden vs Bettina Bunge H2H: 0-2
Bettina Bunge holds a 2–0 lead over Pam Teeguarden in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Bettina Bunge leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Bettina Bunge won the 1982 Washington third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 75
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 63
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 1982 | Washington | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Bettina Bunge | 6-4 6-4 | Pam Teeguarden | Match data |
| Feb 21, 1981* | Houston | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Bettina Bunge | 4-6 6-3 6-1 | Pam Teeguarden | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pam Teeguarden | — | — | — | 1,926 | 245 | 296 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Bettina Bunge | #135 | #8 | 58 | 2,123 | 294 | 182 | 61.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pam Teeguarden | Bettina Bunge | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 16–20 | 44.4% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1968 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 31–23 | 57.4% | — | 1,882 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1969 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 50–23 | 68.5% | — | 2,023 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1970 | 19–19 | 50.0% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 43–21 | 67.2% | — | 2,019 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1971 | 17–21 | 44.7% | — | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 26–11 | 70.3% | — | 2,012 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1972 | 31–25 | 55.4% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #21 | 1,908 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1973 | 21–22 | 48.8% | — | 1,846 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #22 | 1,846 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1974 | 22–18 | 55.0% | — | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #12 | 2,014 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1975 | 21–25 | 45.7% | — | 1,815 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #15 | 1,925 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1976 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1977 | 14–20 | 41.2% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #72 | 1,903 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1978 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1979 | 13–19 | 40.6% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1980 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,803 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1981 | 20–19 | 51.3% | — | 1,788 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1982 | 3–10 | 23.1% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1983 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1984 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,616 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1985 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |