H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Pam Teeguarden vs Bettina Bunge H2H: 0-2

Bettina Bunge holds a 2–0 lead over Pam Teeguarden in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Bettina Bunge leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Bettina Bunge won the 1982 Washington Open round of 32 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Teeguarden
USA Age 75 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Bettina Bunge
GER Age 63 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Bettina Bunge 6-4 6-4 Pam Teeguarden Match data Jan 4, 1982 R32 Washington Open WTA 250 Carpet
Bettina Bunge 4-6 6-3 6-1 Pam Teeguarden Match data Feb 21, 1981* QF Houston WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pam Teeguarden — — — 1,922 246 297 45.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Bettina Bunge #135 #7 58 2,119 294 182 61.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Teeguarden Bettina Bunge
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1978 2–2 50.0% — 1,534 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1979 16–20 44.4% — 1,699 0 0
17 1968 12–17 41.4% — 1,488 0 0 1980 31–23 57.4% — 1,883 0 0
18 1969 5–11 31.2% — 1,493 0 0 1981 50–23 68.5% #9 2,025 0 0
19 1970 19–19 50.0% — 1,612 0 1 1982 43–21 67.2% #9 2,009 0 4
20 1971 17–21 44.7% — 1,679 0 1 1983 26–11 70.3% #7 2,009 0 5
21 1972 31–25 55.4% — 1,868 0 1 1984 28–21 57.1% #21 1,908 0 5
22 1973 22–23 48.9% — 1,839 0 1 1985 25–17 59.5% #22 1,846 0 5
23 1974 22–18 55.0% — 1,901 0 3 1986 34–20 63.0% #12 2,015 0 5
24 1975 21–25 45.7% — 1,816 0 3 1987 32–19 62.7% #15 1,935 0 5
25 1976 7–14 33.3% — 1,779 0 3 — — — — — — —
26 1977 14–20 41.2% — 1,762 0 3 1989 7–5 58.3% #72 1,927 0 5
27 1978 11–19 36.7% — 1,723 0 3 — — — — — — —
28 1979 13–19 40.6% — 1,746 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 1980 17–16 51.5% — 1,802 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 1981 20–19 51.3% — 1,789 0 4 — — — — — — —
31 1982 3–10 23.1% — 1,682 0 4 — — — — — — —
32 1983 4–6 40.0% — 1,651 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 1984 8–11 42.1% — 1,615 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 1985 0–4 0.0% — 1,587 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pam Teeguarden Bettina Bunge
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
17 1968 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1980 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 11 10 21 52.4%
18 1969 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 1981 14 6 20 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 25 11 36 69.4%
19 1970 7 3 10 70.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1982 6 3 9 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 11 28 60.7%
20 1971 3 2 5 60.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1983 — — — — 10 4 14 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 5 18 72.2%
21 1972 3 3 6 50.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 0 7 7 0.0% 1984 8 4 12 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 12 6 18 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2%
22 1973 5 4 9 55.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 1985 9 5 14 64.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 4 7 42.9%
23 1974 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 1986 8 5 13 61.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 13 8 21 61.9%
24 1975 2 5 7 28.6% 14 10 24 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 8 9 11.1% 1987 14 5 19 73.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 6 14 57.1%
25 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1977 2 4 6 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1989 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
27 1978 2 7 9 22.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1979 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1980 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1981 1 5 6 16.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 9 15 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1985 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 57 66 123 46.3% 70 82 152 46.1% 75 65 140 53.6% 36 83 119 30.3% — 73 41 114 64.0% 55 36 91 60.4% 63 35 98 64.3% 100 70 170 58.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pam Teeguarden Bettina Bunge
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1534 105.0 — — — — +90 — — 55.6% -0.22 0–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.04
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1700 137.5 — — — — -79 -106 +10 45.0% -0.31 5–5 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 104.2 -0.09
17 1968 1489 104.8 — — — — +4 -5 +11 45.0% -0.33 1–5 (17%) — — -0.27 1980 1884 156.3 — — — — -86 -197 -78 57.3% +0.69 4–5 (44%) 6–6 (50%) 101.9 -5.90
18 1969 1494 104.2 — — — — — -42 +25 36.1% -1.11 1–3 (25%) — — -0.40 1981 2025 161.1 — — — — +1 -284 -111 64.3% +1.20 12–7 (63%) 11–2 (85%) 110.3 -3.78
19 1970 1613 133.6 — — — — +18 -130 -29 52.9% +0.58 2–9 (18%) 0–1 — -0.45 1982 2009 161.7 — — — — -23 -181 -42 64.0% +1.24 7–5 (58%) 6–10 (38%) 98.2 -4.38
20 1971 1679 136.1 — — — — +4 -80 -95 47.1% +0.06 3–6 (33%) 0–2 — -0.97 1983 2010 158.5 — — — — +80 -107 -71 69.6% +1.56 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 -1.99
21 1972 1868 151.0 — — — — -247 -107 -5 55.4% +0.26 4–9 (31%) 1–1 — -7.18 1984 1909 146.2 — — — — +51 -110 +54 56.4% +0.62 8–6 (57%) 9–5 (64%) 102.9 -3.51
22 1973 1839 149.0 — — — — -139 -96 +71 50.5% -0.06 6–9 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 100.2 -9.05 1985 1846 153.9 — — — — +42 -9 +97 61.1% +1.04 3–5 (38%) 4–6 (40%) 96.3 -2.81
23 1974 1902 145.5 — — — — -77 -170 +7 52.8% +0.33 6–3 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — -4.34 1986 2016 163.2 — — — — +9 -153 -25 59.2% +0.74 11–6 (65%) 8–6 (57%) 106.1 -6.45
24 1975 1817 144.3 — — — — -102 +1 +94 46.8% -0.11 8–9 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 99.4 -4.08 1987 1936 153.2 — — — — +61 -100 +11 62.7% +1.05 7–5 (58%) 4–5 (44%) 97.6 -0.82
25 1976 1779 135.2 — — — — -111 -7 +168 38.0% -1.00 3–5 (38%) — — -3.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1977 1763 141.5 — — — — -105 0 +158 41.4% -0.63 3–3 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 98.3 -3.44 1989 1927 139.0 — — — — +25 — — 57.7% +0.77 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 99.1 -0.43
27 1978 1724 122.7 — — — — -143 -12 +180 36.8% -0.90 5–5 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 97.4 -2.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1979 1746 144.0 — — — — -120 -19 +184 42.7% -0.37 5–6 (45%) 4–7 (36%) 99.3 -1.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1980 1802 134.4 — — — — -98 -69 +93 48.1% -0.16 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) 101.0 -1.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1981 1789 134.6 — — — — -128 -12 +88 52.2% +0.34 6–8 (43%) 3–4 (43%) 97.5 -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1982 1683 118.4 — — — — -148 — +191 31.3% -1.16 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1983 1652 106.0 — — — — -83 +79 — 45.8% -0.13 1–3 (25%) 2–3 (40%) 96.0 +0.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1984 1615 107.2 — — — — -38 +70 +200 40.9% -0.93 4–2 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 105.0 +1.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1985 1588 113.3 — — — — -40 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — -0.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1923 143.0 — — — — -97 -51 +59 46.5% -0.19 67–96 (41%) 36–49 (42%) 93.3 -6.98 — 2120 161.9 — — — — +7 -130 -14 60.3% +0.89 62–49 (56%) 57–51 (53%) 105.9 -6.37

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.