H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Pam Teeguarden vs Hana Mandlikova H2H: 0-1

Hana Mandlikova holds a 1–0 lead over Pam Teeguarden in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hana Mandlikova leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Hana Mandlikova won the 1980 Atlanta quarterfinal 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Teeguarden
USA Age 75 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Hana Mandlikova
AUS Age 64 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Hana Mandlikova 6-4 6-1 Pam Teeguarden Match data Sep 27, 1980* QF Atlanta WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pam Teeguarden — — — 1,922 246 297 45.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Hana Mandlikova #31 #3 157 2,315 518 191 73.1% 4 0 0 4 19 27

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Teeguarden Hana Mandlikova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,758 0 2
17 1968 12–17 41.4% — 1,488 0 0 1979 37–14 72.5% — 1,990 0 7
18 1969 5–11 31.2% — 1,493 0 0 1980 76–17 81.7% #4 2,235 1 13
19 1970 19–19 50.0% — 1,612 0 1 1981 56–24 70.0% #5 2,127 2 16
20 1971 17–21 44.7% — 1,679 0 1 1982 35–19 64.8% #7 2,025 2 16
21 1972 31–25 55.4% — 1,868 0 1 1983 44–21 67.7% — 1,982 2 16
22 1973 22–23 48.9% — 1,839 0 1 1984 47–11 81.0% #3 2,084 2 21
23 1974 22–18 55.0% — 1,901 0 3 1985 53–13 80.3% #3 2,213 3 24
24 1975 21–25 45.7% — 1,816 0 3 1986 44–15 74.6% #4 2,242 3 24
25 1976 7–14 33.3% — 1,779 0 3 1987 47–13 78.3% #5 2,156 4 27
26 1977 14–20 41.2% — 1,762 0 3 1988 15–7 68.2% #29 2,045 4 27
27 1978 11–19 36.7% — 1,723 0 3 1989 33–19 63.5% #14 1,945 4 27
28 1979 13–19 40.6% — 1,746 0 3 1990 8–9 47.1% #31 1,810 4 27
29 1980 17–16 51.5% — 1,802 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 1981 20–19 51.3% — 1,789 0 4 — — — — — — —
31 1982 3–10 23.1% — 1,682 0 4 — — — — — — —
32 1983 4–6 40.0% — 1,651 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 1984 8–11 42.1% — 1,615 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 1985 0–4 0.0% — 1,587 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pam Teeguarden Hana Mandlikova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — —
17 1968 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1979 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 23 4 27 85.2% 2 4 6 33.3%
18 1969 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 1980 19 4 23 82.6% 19 5 24 79.2% 18 3 21 85.7% 20 5 25 80.0%
19 1970 7 3 10 70.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1981 11 3 14 78.6% 14 5 19 73.7% 9 3 12 75.0% 22 13 35 62.9%
20 1971 3 2 5 60.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1982 11 5 16 68.8% 12 5 17 70.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 4 8 50.0%
21 1972 3 3 6 50.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 0 7 7 0.0% 1983 12 4 16 75.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 7 6 13 53.8%
22 1973 5 4 9 55.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 1984 6 4 10 60.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 1 6 83.3% 27 2 29 93.1%
23 1974 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 1985 22 5 27 81.5% 7 2 9 77.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 14 2 16 87.5%
24 1975 2 5 7 28.6% 14 10 24 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 8 9 11.1% 1986 7 2 9 77.8% 11 3 14 78.6% 8 2 10 80.0% 18 8 26 69.2%
25 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 1987 14 5 19 73.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 12 1 13 92.3% 13 4 17 76.5%
26 1977 2 4 6 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1988 11 4 15 73.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
27 1978 2 7 9 22.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 1989 19 9 28 67.9% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
28 1979 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 7 10 30.0% 1990 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 1980 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1981 1 5 6 16.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 9 15 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1985 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 57 66 123 46.3% 70 82 152 46.1% 75 65 140 53.6% 36 83 119 30.3% — 143 54 197 72.6% 119 46 165 72.1% 116 36 152 76.3% 133 52 185 71.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pam Teeguarden Hana Mandlikova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1492 100.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.02
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1759 142.2 — — — — — -128 -39 71.4% +1.84 4–3 (57%) 3–3 (50%) 104.0 +1.62
17 1968 1489 104.8 — — — — +4 -5 +11 45.0% -0.33 1–5 (17%) — — -0.27 1979 1991 150.7 — — — — -306 -198 +6 67.9% +1.46 9–3 (75%) 5–6 (45%) 108.6 -0.72
18 1969 1494 104.2 — — — — — -42 +25 36.1% -1.11 1–3 (25%) — — -0.40 1980 2235 168.8 — — — — -89 -219 -70 77.5% +2.09 15–12 (56%) 9–6 (60%) 107.8 -9.15
19 1970 1613 133.6 — — — — +18 -130 -29 52.9% +0.58 2–9 (18%) 0–1 — -0.45 1981 2127 168.7 — — — — -45 -13 +80 70.8% +1.60 7–4 (64%) 5–6 (45%) 100.4 -6.49
20 1971 1679 136.1 — — — — +4 -80 -95 47.1% +0.06 3–6 (33%) 0–2 — -0.97 1982 2025 155.2 — — — — +44 +111 +37 60.3% +0.61 12–5 (71%) 6–5 (55%) 101.1 -6.83
21 1972 1868 151.0 — — — — -247 -107 -5 55.4% +0.26 4–9 (31%) 1–1 — -7.18 1983 1983 163.6 — — — — +67 +169 +26 70.3% +1.45 3–9 (25%) 7–1 (88%) 95.7 -3.35
22 1973 1839 149.0 — — — — -139 -96 +71 50.5% -0.06 6–9 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 100.2 -9.05 1984 2084 165.9 — — — — +42 +34 -16 76.7% +2.05 10–5 (67%) 8–4 (67%) 103.0 -1.62
23 1974 1902 145.5 — — — — -77 -170 +7 52.8% +0.33 6–3 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — -4.34 1985 2213 169.9 — — — — +68 -92 -93 76.0% +1.84 9–5 (64%) 12–3 (80%) 109.1 -4.75
24 1975 1817 144.3 — — — — -102 +1 +94 46.8% -0.11 8–9 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 99.4 -4.08 1986 2242 174.9 — — — — +26 -48 -79 70.7% +1.50 10–5 (67%) 4–6 (40%) 98.7 -6.78
25 1976 1779 135.2 — — — — -111 -7 +168 38.0% -1.00 3–5 (38%) — — -3.53 1987 2156 168.9 — — — — +16 +20 +142 75.8% +1.97 9–3 (75%) 7–4 (64%) 102.5 -3.19
26 1977 1763 141.5 — — — — -105 0 +158 41.4% -0.63 3–3 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 98.3 -3.44 1988 2045 145.0 — — — — +89 +61 +204 65.3% +1.49 3–2 (60%) 0–4 (0%) 93.6 -0.30
27 1978 1724 122.7 — — — — -143 -12 +180 36.8% -0.90 5–5 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 97.4 -2.11 1989 1946 155.1 — — — — +75 +103 +225 57.5% +0.38 15–3 (83%) 9–3 (75%) 105.5 -3.52
28 1979 1746 144.0 — — — — -120 -19 +184 42.7% -0.37 5–6 (45%) 4–7 (36%) 99.3 -1.56 1990 1810 125.0 — — — — +120 +176 +361 51.4% +0.19 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +0.31
29 1980 1802 134.4 — — — — -98 -69 +93 48.1% -0.16 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) 101.0 -1.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1981 1789 134.6 — — — — -128 -12 +88 52.2% +0.34 6–8 (43%) 3–4 (43%) 97.5 -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1982 1683 118.4 — — — — -148 — +191 31.3% -1.16 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1983 1652 106.0 — — — — -83 +79 — 45.8% -0.13 1–3 (25%) 2–3 (40%) 96.0 +0.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1984 1615 107.2 — — — — -38 +70 +200 40.9% -0.93 4–2 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 105.0 +1.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1985 1588 113.3 — — — — -40 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — -0.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1923 143.0 — — — — -97 -51 +59 46.5% -0.19 67–96 (41%) 36–49 (42%) 93.3 -6.98 — 2316 169.2 — — — — +11 -14 +17 70.3% +1.52 108–63 (63%) 76–52 (59%) 107.2 -6.38

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.