H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Pam Teeguarden vs Raquel Giscafre H2H: 3-0

Pam Teeguarden holds a 3–0 lead over Raquel Giscafre in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Pam Teeguarden leads 3–0 on grass. Most recently, Pam Teeguarden won the 1978 Chichester round of 32 4-6 6-0 8-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Teeguarden
USA Age 75 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Raquel Giscafre
ARG Age 77

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pam Teeguarden 4-6 6-0 8-6 Raquel Giscafre Match data Jun 15, 1978* R32 Chichester WTA 250 Grass
Pam Teeguarden 6-2 6-3 Raquel Giscafre Match data Aug 26, 1972* R16 Newport WTA 250 Grass
Pam Teeguarden 6-0 1-0 (ret.) Raquel Giscafre Match data Jun 30, 1972* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pam Teeguarden — — — 1,922 246 297 45.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Raquel Giscafre — — — 1,798 86 120 41.7% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Teeguarden Raquel Giscafre
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1968 12–17 41.4% — 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1969 5–11 31.2% — 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1970 19–19 50.0% — 1,612 0 1 1968 5–8 38.5% — 1,494 0 0
20 1971 17–21 44.7% — 1,679 0 1 1969 9–15 37.5% — 1,489 0 0
21 1972 31–25 55.4% — 1,868 0 1 1970 3–2 60.0% — 1,504 0 0
22 1973 22–23 48.9% — 1,839 0 1 1971 5–13 27.8% — 1,467 0 0
23 1974 22–18 55.0% — 1,901 0 3 1972 6–16 27.3% — 1,488 0 0
24 1975 21–25 45.7% — 1,816 0 3 1973 11–11 50.0% — 1,605 0 1
25 1976 7–14 33.3% — 1,779 0 3 1974 26–17 60.5% — 1,743 0 3
26 1977 14–20 41.2% — 1,762 0 3 1975 15–18 45.5% — 1,727 0 4
27 1978 11–19 36.7% — 1,723 0 3 1976 2–3 40.0% — 1,710 0 4
28 1979 13–19 40.6% — 1,746 0 3 1977 2–6 25.0% — 1,658 0 4
29 1980 17–16 51.5% — 1,802 0 3 1978 1–8 11.1% — 1,558 0 4
30 1981 20–19 51.3% — 1,789 0 4 1979 1–1 50.0% — 1,564 0 4
31 1982 3–10 23.1% — 1,682 0 4 1980 0–2 0.0% — 1,538 0 4
32 1983 4–6 40.0% — 1,651 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 1984 8–11 42.1% — 1,615 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 1985 0–4 0.0% — 1,587 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pam Teeguarden Raquel Giscafre
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1968 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1969 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1970 7 3 10 70.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1968 — — — — 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 1971 3 2 5 60.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1969 — — — — 9 14 23 39.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1972 3 3 6 50.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 0 7 7 0.0% 1970 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1973 5 4 9 55.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 1971 — — — — 3 8 11 27.3% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — —
23 1974 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 1972 1 2 3 33.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — —
24 1975 2 5 7 28.6% 14 10 24 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 8 9 11.1% 1973 0 1 1 0.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
25 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 1974 1 1 2 50.0% 21 8 29 72.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 1977 2 4 6 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1975 1 5 6 16.7% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
27 1978 2 7 9 22.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 1976 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1979 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 7 10 30.0% 1977 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1980 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1981 1 5 6 16.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 9 15 40.0% 1979 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
31 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 1980 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1985 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 57 66 123 46.3% 70 82 152 46.1% 75 65 140 53.6% 36 83 119 30.3% — 3 10 13 23.1% 67 66 133 50.4% 11 33 44 25.0% 5 9 14 35.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pam Teeguarden Raquel Giscafre
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1968 1489 104.8 — — — — +4 -5 +11 45.0% -0.33 1–5 (17%) — — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1969 1494 104.2 — — — — — -42 +25 36.1% -1.11 1–3 (25%) — — -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1970 1613 133.6 — — — — +18 -130 -29 52.9% +0.58 2–9 (18%) 0–1 — -0.45 1968 1495 94.8 — — — — — -8 — 36.0% -1.24 0–1 — — -0.01
20 1971 1679 136.1 — — — — +4 -80 -95 47.1% +0.06 3–6 (33%) 0–2 — -0.97 1969 1490 111.5 — — — — — -2 — 40.4% -0.28 0–1 — — +1.55
21 1972 1868 151.0 — — — — -247 -107 -5 55.4% +0.26 4–9 (31%) 1–1 — -7.18 1970 1505 104.3 — — — — — +28 — 60.0% +1.10 — — — +1.15
22 1973 1839 149.0 — — — — -139 -96 +71 50.5% -0.06 6–9 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 100.2 -9.05 1971 1468 99.0 — — — — — +19 -2 32.4% -1.76 1–3 (25%) — — +1.07
23 1974 1902 145.5 — — — — -77 -170 +7 52.8% +0.33 6–3 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — -4.34 1972 1489 108.6 — — — — +89 -52 -8 31.8% -1.61 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.68
24 1975 1817 144.3 — — — — -102 +1 +94 46.8% -0.11 8–9 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 99.4 -4.08 1973 1606 135.2 — — — — — +16 -154 52.5% +0.58 1–1 — — +1.95
25 1976 1779 135.2 — — — — -111 -7 +168 38.0% -1.00 3–5 (38%) — — -3.53 1974 1743 135.9 — — — — -177 +93 -250 59.1% +0.59 8–5 (62%) 4–2 (67%) 106.5 +0.72
26 1977 1763 141.5 — — — — -105 0 +158 41.4% -0.63 3–3 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 98.3 -3.44 1975 1728 134.7 — — — — -62 +89 — 47.3% -0.26 3–7 (30%) 1–3 (25%) 94.6 +0.32
27 1978 1724 122.7 — — — — -143 -12 +180 36.8% -0.90 5–5 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 97.4 -2.11 1976 1711 111.5 — — — — — +86 — 40.0% -0.70 — — — -0.40
28 1979 1746 144.0 — — — — -120 -19 +184 42.7% -0.37 5–6 (45%) 4–7 (36%) 99.3 -1.56 1977 1658 103.2 — — — — — +95 — 27.8% -1.61 1–1 0–1 — -0.01
29 1980 1802 134.4 — — — — -98 -69 +93 48.1% -0.16 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) 101.0 -1.72 1978 1559 95.5 — — — — — — -163 21.1% -1.95 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.61
30 1981 1789 134.6 — — — — -128 -12 +88 52.2% +0.34 6–8 (43%) 3–4 (43%) 97.5 -0.17 1979 1565 101.2 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — +0.11
31 1982 1683 118.4 — — — — -148 — +191 31.3% -1.16 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — +0.19 1980 1539 91.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — -0.22
32 1983 1652 106.0 — — — — -83 +79 — 45.8% -0.13 1–3 (25%) 2–3 (40%) 96.0 +0.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1984 1615 107.2 — — — — -38 +70 +200 40.9% -0.93 4–2 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 105.0 +1.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1985 1588 113.3 — — — — -40 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — -0.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1923 143.0 — — — — -97 -51 +59 46.5% -0.19 67–96 (41%) 36–49 (42%) 93.3 -6.98 — 1798 123.7 — — — — -73 +40 -101 43.7% -0.47 18–23 (44%) 7–8 (47%) 98.7 +3.08

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.