H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Pascale Paradis Mangon vs Pam Casale H2H: 0-2
Pam Casale holds a 2–0 lead over Pascale Paradis Mangon in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pam Casale leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pam Casale won the 1985 Mahwah third round 3-6 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 60
Right-Handed
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 1985* | Mahwah | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Pam Casale | 3-6 6-3 6-1 | Pascale Paradis Mangon | Match data |
| Jan 2, 1984 | Washington | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Pam Casale | 6-2 6-2 | Pascale Paradis Mangon | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pascale Paradis Mangon | — | — | — | 1,817 | 139 | 157 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Pam Casale | #671 | #14 | 22 | 1,944 | 168 | 147 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pascale Paradis Mangon | Pam Casale | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1983 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 30–17 | 63.8% | — | 1,811 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1984 | 25–21 | 54.3% | — | 1,794 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 20–23 | 46.5% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,732 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 5–16 | 23.8% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #15 | 1,914 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,572 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #14 | 1,814 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 19–12 | 61.3% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #41 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 4–10 | 28.6% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #111 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 3–9 | 25.0% | — | 1,591 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #169 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 13–14 | 48.1% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1992 | 21–17 | 55.3% | — | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #554 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1993 | 16–16 | 50.0% | — | 1,674 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |