H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Patricia Coleman vs Nathalie Fuchs H2H: 1-0

Patricia Coleman holds a 1–0 lead over Nathalie Fuchs in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Patricia Coleman leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Patricia Coleman won the 1972 Hobart 2 round of 16 6-7 7-6 4-0 RET.

H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
FRA Age 74 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Patricia Coleman 6-7 7-6 4-0 (ret.) Nathalie Fuchs Match data Dec 22, 1972* R16 Hobart 2 WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Patricia Coleman 1,831 63 53 54.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Nathalie Fuchs 1,782 104 103 50.2% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Patricia Coleman Nathalie Fuchs
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1969 1–2 33.3% 1,492 0 0
17 1970 2–2 50.0% 1,519 0 0 1970 1–3 25.0% 1,489 0 0
18 1971 3–6 33.3% 1,548 0 0 1971 4–6 40.0% 1,528 0 0
19 1972 40–16 71.4% 1,831 0 1 1972 21–21 50.0% 1,626 0 1
20 1973 11–14 44.0% 1,714 0 1 1973 28–24 53.8% 1,682 0 3
21 1974 4–9 30.8% 1,577 0 1 1974 19–15 55.9% 1,772 0 4
22 1975 11–16 40.7% 1,630 0 4
23 1976 7–8 46.7% 1,629 0 4
24 1977 0–1 0.0% 1,577 0 1 1977 2–2 50.0% 1,634 0 4
25 1978 2–3 40.0% 1,574 0 1 1978 10–5 66.7% 1,633 0 4
26 1979 0–1 0.0% 1,621 0 4
27 1980 1–2 33.3% 1,590 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Patricia Coleman Nathalie Fuchs
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1969 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1970 2 2 4 50.0% 1970 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1971 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1971 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1972 14 5 19 73.7% 26 11 37 70.3% 1972 13 10 23 56.5% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
20 1973 3 1 4 75.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 8 12 33.3% 1973 4 3 7 57.1% 14 11 25 56.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0%
21 1974 0 3 3 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1974 2 1 3 66.7% 13 7 20 65.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
22 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 6 10 16 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
25 1978 1 2 3 33.3% 1978 8 4 12 66.7%
26 1979 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1980 1 1 2 50.0%
Career 3 1 4 75.0% 20 17 37 54.1% 38 32 70 54.3% 6 6 12 50.0% 66 57 123 53.7% 8 22 30 26.7% 12 12 24 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Patricia Coleman Nathalie Fuchs
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1969 1493 102.7 33.3% -0.67 +0.20
17 1970 1520 110.1 +9 44.4% -0.56 1–0 +0.11 1970 1489 103.7 +24 25.0% -1.50 +0.36
18 1971 1549 134.3 +49 40.0% -0.70 0–2 0–1 -0.46 1971 1528 111.5 +20 +25 38.1% -1.33 1–0 0–1 0.00
19 1972 1831 133.8 -91 +34 66.4% +0.96 10–1 (91%) 7–2 (78%) 115.8 +2.43 1972 1626 127.8 -89 +40 -84 51.1% +0.14 5–5 (50%) 1–0 +2.57
20 1973 1715 131.1 -64 -33 +36 46.3% -0.06 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.6 +0.56 1973 1683 125.2 -46 -23 -123 50.0% -0.10 10–8 (56%) 2–3 (40%) 100.5 +5.03
21 1974 1577 95.0 +22 +74 36.7% -1.33 1–3 (25%) +2.64 1974 1772 129.2 -57 -3 -252 55.7% +0.37 5–1 (83%) 0–2 -0.31
22 1975 1631 121.5 +21 42.9% -0.46 2–2 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 97.9 -0.41
23 1976 1629 120.9 +34 50.0% +0.37 1–1 1–0 +1.16
24 1977 1577 110.7 0.0% -5.00 -0.30 1977 1635 106.0 +67 55.6% +0.11 0–1 1–0 +0.66
25 1978 1574 104.2 +53 41.7% -1.00 1–1 +0.48 1978 1633 112.6 +28 64.3% +1.00 1–1 +2.09
26 1979 1622 99.4 33.3% -2.67 0–1 -0.01
27 1980 1591 95.4 28.6% -1.29 1–0 +0.40
Career 1831 131.0 -64 -55 +42 53.2% +0.10 14–10 (58%) 8–5 (62%) 108.0 +4.92 1783 127.4 -44 +14 -109 49.8% -0.04 25–19 (57%) 7–10 (41%) 100.8 +5.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.