H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Patricia Hy Boulais vs Kathy Horvath H2H: 0-1

Kathy Horvath holds a 1–0 lead over Patricia Hy Boulais in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kathy Horvath leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kathy Horvath won the 1983 Nashville semifinal 7-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Patricia Hy Boulais
CAN Age 61 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Kathy Horvath
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kathy Horvath 7-6 6-4 Patricia Hy Boulais Match data Mar 5, 1983* SF Nashville WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Patricia Hy Boulais — — — 1,906 142 165 46.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Kathy Horvath #283 #10 24 1,975 187 155 54.7% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Patricia Hy Boulais Kathy Horvath
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1979 0–2 0.0% — 1,496 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1980 6–7 46.2% — 1,563 0 0
15 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0 1981 34–23 59.6% — 1,858 0 2
16 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0 1982 15–17 46.9% — 1,775 0 2
17 1983 7–8 46.7% — 1,546 0 0 1983 39–18 68.4% — 1,930 0 4
18 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,522 0 0 1984 25–19 56.8% #29 1,799 0 4
19 — — — — — — — 1985 23–16 59.0% #34 1,775 0 6
20 1986 8–1 88.9% — 1,633 0 1 1986 16–15 51.6% #47 1,739 0 6
21 1987 9–15 37.5% — 1,594 0 1 1987 18–15 54.5% #37 1,714 0 7
22 1988 0–5 0.0% — 1,548 0 1 1988 9–15 37.5% #85 1,602 0 7
23 1989 1–4 20.0% — 1,514 0 1 1989 2–8 20.0% #224 1,529 0 7
24 1990 7–7 50.0% — 1,573 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 1991 18–17 51.4% — 1,704 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 1992 22–16 57.9% — 1,876 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 1993 21–15 58.3% — 1,851 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 1994 15–16 48.4% — 1,756 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 1995 11–14 44.0% — 1,691 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 1996 10–16 38.5% — 1,687 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 1997 12–19 38.7% — 1,663 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 1998 1–8 11.1% — 1,573 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Patricia Hy Boulais Kathy Horvath
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
15 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1981 7 4 11 63.6% 15 8 23 65.2% — — — — 12 11 23 52.2%
16 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1982 0 2 2 0.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 7 9 22.2%
17 1983 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1983 9 4 13 69.2% 21 11 32 65.6% — — — — 9 3 12 75.0%
18 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1984 0 5 5 0.0% 21 9 30 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 6 5 11 54.5% 17 7 24 70.8% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0%
20 1986 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — 5 0 5 100.0% 1986 8 7 15 53.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
21 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1987 6 6 12 50.0% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1988 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 2 5 7 28.6% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 1989 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 1990 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1991 13 11 24 54.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1992 8 5 13 61.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1993 10 9 19 52.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 11 9 20 55.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 5 8 13 38.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 1 7 8 12.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 4 10 14 28.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 72 85 157 45.9% 28 39 67 41.8% 27 23 50 54.0% 15 18 33 45.5% — 45 50 95 47.4% 111 67 178 62.4% 3 6 9 33.3% 28 32 60 46.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Patricia Hy Boulais Kathy Horvath
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1497 113.4 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 0–1 — -0.25
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1563 110.2 — — — — +45 -63 — 43.3% -0.37 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 102.0 -0.09
15 1981 1493 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.07 1981 1859 146.5 — — — — -40 -79 — 56.3% +0.44 11–7 (61%) 7–5 (58%) 108.4 +0.14
16 1982 1477 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.18 1982 1775 143.3 — — — — -40 +62 — 52.9% +0.46 1–7 (13%) 2–3 (40%) 92.6 -4.36
17 1983 1546 117.5 — — — — +51 — +83 46.9% +0.12 1–1 1–1 — +0.93 1983 1931 149.2 — — — — -65 +55 — 63.7% +0.74 9–3 (75%) 11–6 (65%) 109.3 +1.14
18 1984 1523 101.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–2 0–1 — +0.06 1984 1799 146.8 — — — — -83 +206 — 56.1% +0.43 5–5 (50%) 3–7 (30%) 94.7 +0.34
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1776 138.0 — — — — -112 +220 — 55.8% +0.24 6–2 (75%) 5–2 (71%) 104.1 -0.67
20 1986 1633 110.5 — — — — +41 — — 69.6% +1.65 5–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) — +2.61 1986 1740 130.3 — — — — -73 +184 -140 48.6% -0.18 7–3 (70%) 3–3 (50%) 104.3 -1.58
21 1987 1595 115.4 — — — — +48 — +10 37.5% -0.93 5–3 (63%) 1–6 (14%) 97.9 -0.17 1987 1714 125.9 — — — — -43 +149 — 54.1% +0.18 6–4 (60%) 3–2 (60%) 101.2 +3.16
22 1988 1548 99.0 — — — — +29 — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–2 — -0.27 1988 1603 116.3 — — — — +7 +113 — 41.5% -0.64 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 94.3 +0.35
23 1989 1515 91.9 — — — — +9 — — 20.0% -2.30 — — — +0.31 1989 1530 101.0 — — — — +17 — — 33.3% -1.38 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 95.4 +0.29
24 1990 1574 118.5 — — — — +7 — — 51.7% +0.41 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1991 1704 141.1 — — — — -20 -265 +2 50.0% +0.11 6–4 (60%) 2–1 (67%) 104.8 -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1992 1877 155.6 — — — — -71 -231 -109 56.3% +0.35 7–3 (70%) 2–2 (50%) 107.4 -1.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1993 1852 141.8 — — — — -46 -170 +3 57.0% +0.38 6–3 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 105.0 -1.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 1756 132.7 — — — — +24 -99 — 52.4% +0.25 2–3 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.3 -0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 1691 125.6 — — — — +15 -27 — 50.0% -0.18 3–9 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 93.7 +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 1687 132.9 — — — — -41 -41 +161 40.0% -0.73 4–4 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.0 -1.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 1664 129.6 — — — — -71 +1 +194 40.3% -0.58 8–7 (53%) 2–5 (29%) 99.0 -0.88 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 1574 92.9 — — — — -25 -9 — 26.1% -2.00 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1906 138.1 — — — — -10 -116 +43 47.1% -0.18 50–44 (53%) 22–33 (40%) 98.3 -0.72 — 1976 144.0 — — — — -49 +106 -140 53.7% +0.21 49–40 (55%) 39–36 (52%) 103.2 -0.45

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.