H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Patricia Hy Boulais vs Patricia Medrado H2H: 0-1
Patricia Medrado holds a 1–0 lead over Patricia Hy Boulais in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Patricia Medrado leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Patricia Medrado won the 1981 Hong Kong third round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 1981* | Hong Kong | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Patricia Medrado | 6-1 6-3 | Patricia Hy Boulais | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patricia Hy Boulais | — | — | — | 1,907 | 140 | 163 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Patricia Medrado | #359 | #67 | 9 | 1,837 | 152 | 163 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patricia Hy Boulais | Patricia Medrado | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1983 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 8–1 | 88.9% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1987 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1988 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1989 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 22–10 | 68.8% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1990 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 38–20 | 65.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 1991 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,702 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 33–25 | 56.9% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1992 | 21–15 | 58.3% | — | 1,878 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 4–18 | 18.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 1993 | 21–15 | 58.3% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #108 | 1,588 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #108 | 1,542 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 1995 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,562 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 1996 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #117 | 1,552 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | 1997 | 12–19 | 38.7% | — | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #180 | 1,474 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | 1998 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |