H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:15 UTC
Patricia Maria Tig vs Evgeniya Rodina
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Patricia Maria Tig vs Evgeniya Rodina.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 31
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 37
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patricia Maria Tig | #417 | #56 | 1,284 | 1,739 | 40 | 52 | 43.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Evgeniya Rodina | #1,376 | #67 | 882 | 1,663 | 74 | 119 | 38.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patricia Maria Tig | Evgeniya Rodina | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #320 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #145 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #123 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #108 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #107 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #232 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #106 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #370 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #114 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #474 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #56 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2021 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #225 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #86 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #436 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #105 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #71 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #400 | 1,470 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #295 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #438 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #443 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |