H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Patricia Maria Tig vs Lourdes Domínguez Lino H2H: 0-1

Lourdes Domínguez Lino holds a 1–0 lead over Patricia Maria Tig in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lourdes Domínguez Lino leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lourdes Domínguez Lino won the 2016 Bogotá Open first round 5-7 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Patricia Maria Tig
Romania Age 32 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Spain Age 45 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #106 5-7 6-4 6-4 Patricia Maria Tig #133 Match data Apr 14, 2016* R32 Bogotá Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Patricia Maria Tig #417 #56 1,284 1,743 41 52 44.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #1,129 #40 1,305 1,673 125 157 44.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Patricia Maria Tig Lourdes Domínguez Lino
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2000 0–1 0.0% #141 1,489 0 0
20 2015 5–4 55.6% #123 1,532 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #378 1,479 0 0
21 2016 8–11 42.1% #108 1,526 0 0 2002 4–3 57.1% #390 1,518 0 0
22 2017 3–10 23.1% #232 1,500 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #319 1,503 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2004 1–1 50.0% #208 1,508 0 0
24 2019 8–4 66.7% #114 1,659 0 0 2005 6–4 60.0% #72 1,553 0 0
25 2020 11–5 68.8% #56 1,727 0 1 2006 21–19 52.5% #52 1,623 0 1
26 2021 3–9 25.0% #225 1,626 0 1 2007 16–21 43.2% #71 1,557 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 2008 6–11 35.3% #91 1,507 0 1
28 2023 2–7 22.2% #436 1,533 0 1 2009 6–13 31.6% #134 1,477 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2010 2–4 33.3% #85 1,487 0 1
30 2025 1–2 33.3% #400 1,469 0 1 2011 16–16 50.0% #79 1,574 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2012 16–16 50.0% #48 1,652 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2013 17–22 43.6% #69 1,620 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2014 7–11 38.9% #110 1,568 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2015 4–5 44.4% #100 1,550 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2016 3–8 27.3% #220 1,516 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Patricia Maria Tig Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2015 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2016 4 5 9 44.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2002 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
22 2017 3 6 9 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2019 2 2 4 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2020 4 2 6 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 7 10 17 41.2% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2021 2 4 6 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2007 3 9 12 25.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 4 4 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — —
28 2023 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 1 3 4 25.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2025 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2011 3 6 9 33.3% 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 10 8 18 55.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1 8 9 11.1% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 0 5 5 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
Career — 21 28 49 42.9% 19 21 40 47.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — 27 59 86 31.4% 94 88 182 51.6% 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Patricia Maria Tig Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1489 98.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.06
20 2015 1532 106.0 -1.09 +1.08 1.048 50.8% +14 — — 52.9% -0.29 0–1 — — +0.85 2001 1480 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.06
21 2016 1527 104.9 -1.75 -1.01 0.914 48.2% -21 +55 — 44.7% -0.62 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 101.3 +0.41 2002 1519 112.4 — — — — — +41 — 57.1% +0.14 — 2–1 (67%) — +0.22
22 2017 1501 110.1 -3.01 -2.64 0.788 44.5% +29 +16 — 30.4% -1.48 0–1 4–1 (80%) — -0.05 2003 1503 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.07
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1509 105.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.34 1–1 0–1 — +0.01
24 2019 1660 117.4 -0.28 +1.62 1.094 52.2% -105 +70 — 64.3% +0.97 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +0.92 2005 1553 117.7 — — — — — +72 — 61.9% +0.38 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.23
25 2020 1728 126.3 -0.51 +3.24 1.123 52.8% -128 +65 — 65.7% +1.06 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) — +1.17 2006 1623 121.0 — — — — -68 +93 — 51.2% -0.30 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 102.8 +0.22
26 2021 1626 106.9 -1.94 -2.64 0.797 45.6% -63 +83 -83 34.6% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) 95.9 -0.48 2007 1558 113.3 — — — — -56 +110 — 43.2% -0.49 4–3 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 -0.29
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1508 107.1 — — — — -48 +107 — 37.8% -1.11 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — -0.03
28 2023 1534 106.6 -5.52 -1.65 0.756 43.5% +4 — — 28.6% -2.19 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 100.1 +0.11 2009 1477 108.0 — — — — -35 +83 — 37.8% -0.82 2–5 (29%) 2–5 (29%) 95.2 +0.87
29 2024 1554 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1487 102.6 — — — — 0 — — 35.7% -1.36 1–1 0–1 — +0.13
30 2025 1469 105.5 — — — — — +59 — 42.9% -0.28 0–1 0–1 — +0.05 2011 1575 121.5 — — — — -73 0 +20 50.0% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 1–7 (13%) 95.2 +0.42
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1653 124.6 — — — — -17 -96 — 54.3% +0.04 2–6 (25%) 4–1 (80%) 100.6 0.00
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1620 121.2 — — — — -86 +113 — 41.3% -0.81 10–8 (56%) 2–3 (40%) 103.9 -1.33
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1569 107.5 — — — — -102 +137 — 40.0% -0.89 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.57
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1550 113.7 -1.03 +0.35 0.984 50.1% — +126 — 50.0% -0.05 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — +0.51
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1517 97.5 -3.20 -2.29 0.761 44.1% -86 +117 — 25.0% -1.75 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.18
Career — 1743 115.2 -1.84 -0.19 0.930 48.5% -28 +59 -83 47.1% -0.38 10–16 (38%) 13–9 (59%) 98.4 +3.20 — 1674 120.0 -2.29 -1.18 0.851 46.6% -55 +78 +20 45.2% -0.48 35–45 (44%) 26–29 (47%) 98.8 +0.46

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.