H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Patricia Maria Tig vs Monica Puig H2H: 0-1
Monica Puig holds a 1–0 lead over Patricia Maria Tig in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Monica Puig leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Monica Puig won the 2017 Australian Open first round 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 31
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
PUR
Age 32
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2017* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Monica Puig | 6-0 6-1 | Patricia Maria Tig | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patricia Maria Tig | #417 | #56 | 1,284 | 1,739 | 40 | 52 | 43.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Monica Puig | #1,073 | #27 | 1,570 | 1,838 | 128 | 136 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patricia Maria Tig | Monica Puig | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #56 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #123 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #59 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2016 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #108 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #92 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2017 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #232 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #32 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #58 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2019 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #114 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #53 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2020 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #56 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #79 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2021 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #225 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #105 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #436 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1073 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #400 | 1,470 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |