H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC
Patricia Maria Tig vs Sílvia Soler-Espinosa H2H: 1-0
Patricia Maria Tig holds a 1–0 lead over Sílvia Soler-Espinosa in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Patricia Maria Tig leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Patricia Maria Tig won the 2015 Bucharest third round 6-4 3-1 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 31
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 38
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2015* | Bucharest | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Patricia Maria Tig | 6-4 3-1 (ret.) | Sílvia Soler-Espinosa | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patricia Maria Tig | #417 | #56 | 1,284 | 1,739 | 40 | 52 | 43.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Sílvia Soler-Espinosa | #858 | #54 | 1,157 | 1,643 | 56 | 102 | 35.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patricia Maria Tig | Sílvia Soler-Espinosa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2015 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #123 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2016 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #108 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #232 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #167 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #81 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #114 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #83 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #56 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #82 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #225 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #66 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #145 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #436 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #128 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #225 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #400 | 1,470 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #190 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #681 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |