H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Patricia Maria Tig vs Venus Williams H2H: 0-1

Venus Williams holds a 1–0 lead over Patricia Maria Tig in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Venus Williams leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2017 Miami third round 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Patricia Maria Tig
ROU Age 31 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 26, 2017* Miami WTA 1000 R32 Hard Venus Williams #12 6-3 6-0 Patricia Maria Tig #95 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Patricia Maria Tig #417 #56 1,284 1,739 40 52 43.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Patricia Maria Tig Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 — — — — — — — 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 2015 5–4 55.6% #123 1,532 0 0 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 2016 8–12 40.0% #108 1,520 0 0 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 2017 2–9 18.2% #232 1,485 0 0 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 — — — — — — — 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 2019 8–4 66.7% #114 1,652 0 0 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 2020 11–5 68.8% #56 1,724 0 1 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 2021 3–9 25.0% #225 1,623 0 1 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 — — — — — — — 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2023 2–7 22.2% #436 1,535 0 1 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 — — — — — — — 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 2025 1–2 33.3% #400 1,470 0 1 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 — — — — — — — 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 — — — — — — — 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 — — — — — — — 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 — — — — — — — 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 — — — — — — — 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 — — — — — — — 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 — — — — — — — 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47