H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Patricia Mayr-Achleitner vs Alexandra Panova H2H: 0-1
Alexandra Panova holds a 1–0 lead over Patricia Mayr-Achleitner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alexandra Panova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alexandra Panova won the 2009 Tashkent fourth round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 39
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 37
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2009* | Tashkent | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Alexandra Panova | 7-5 6-1 | Patricia Mayr-Achleitner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patricia Mayr-Achleitner | #558 | #70 | 877 | 1,600 | 47 | 77 | 37.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Alexandra Panova | #1,014 | #71 | 890 | 1,546 | 32 | 52 | 38.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patricia Mayr-Achleitner | Alexandra Panova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #208 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #142 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #112 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #153 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #91 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #118 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #88 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #99 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #135 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #166 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2013 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #92 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #133 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2014 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #113 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #558 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #361 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 |