H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Patricia Mayr-Achleitner vs Nicole Vaidisova H2H: 0-1
Nicole Vaidisova holds a 1–0 lead over Patricia Mayr-Achleitner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicole Vaidisova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicole Vaidisova won the 2009 Miami first round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 39
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 37
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2009* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Nicole Vaidisova | 6-4 6-2 | Patricia Mayr-Achleitner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patricia Mayr-Achleitner | #558 | #70 | 877 | 1,600 | 47 | 77 | 37.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nicole Vaidisova | #832 | #7 | 1,981 | 1,997 | 155 | 84 | 64.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patricia Mayr-Achleitner | Nicole Vaidisova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 14–5 | 73.7% | #75 | 1,674 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 45–14 | 76.3% | #15 | 1,948 | 0 | 5 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #10 | 1,916 | 0 | 6 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 35–14 | 71.4% | #12 | 1,946 | 0 | 6 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #41 | 1,711 | 0 | 6 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #175 | 1,578 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 2008 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #112 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #666 | 1,579 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 2009 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #91 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2010 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2011 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #99 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2012 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #166 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2013 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #92 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #261 | 1,566 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2014 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #113 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #558 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |